Showing 6 of 8 total issues
Class Opt
has 46 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Opt < Struct.new(:strs, :opts, :block)
include Cast, Regex
OPTS = %i(
alias default deprecated description downcase eg enum example format
Method format
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def format
opts = []
opts << "alias: #{format_aliases(opt)}" if opt.aliases?
opts << "requires: #{opt.requires.join(', ')}" if opt.requires?
opts << "default: #{format_default(opt)}" if opt.default?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method apply
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def apply
error :missing_strs if strs.empty?
error :wrong_strs if short.size > 1 || long.size > 1
error :invalid_strs, invalid unless invalid.empty?
error :unknown_opts, unknown.map(&:inspect).join(', ') unless unknown.empty?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method splat
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def splat(values)
args.each.with_index.inject([]) do |group, (arg, ix)|
count = arg && arg.splat? ? [values.size - args.size + ix + 1] : []
count = 0 if count.first.to_i < 0
group << values.shift(*count)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method format
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def format
opts = []
opts << "type: #{type(obj)}" unless obj.type == :flag
opts << 'required' if obj.required?
opts += Opt.new(obj).format if obj.is_a?(Cl::Opt)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method group
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def group(args, cmds = [])
args.flatten.map(&:to_s).inject([[]]) do |cmds, arg|
cmd = Cmd.registered?(arg) ? Cmd[arg] : nil
cmd ? cmds << [cmd] : cmds.last << arg
cmds.reject(&:empty?)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"