Showing 3 of 3 total issues
Method start_with
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def start_with(scope = nil, *arguments, &block)
raise ArgumentError, 'START WITH: scope or block expected, none given' unless scope || block
case scope
when Hash, String
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method conditions_to_proc
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def conditions_to_proc(conditions)
proc do |parent, child|
conditions.map do |parent_expression, child_expression|
parent_expression = parent[parent_expression] if parent_expression.is_a?(Symbol)
child_expression = child[child_expression] if child_expression.is_a?(Symbol)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method traverse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def traverse(ast, &blck)
if ast && ast.respond_to?(:left) && ast.left
traverse(ast.left, &blck)
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"