Showing 365 of 1,902 total issues
Function wrap2
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(min: ReadonlyVec, max: ReadonlyVec): GlobalConstraint =>
(p, boid) => {
const [x, y] = p;
let wrap = false;
if (x < min[0] || x > max[0]) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((<FTerm>p)($p)) {
collectFull(res, $s, sval);
break;
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function wrap3
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(min: ReadonlyVec, max: ReadonlyVec): GlobalConstraint =>
(p, boid) => {
let [x, y, z] = p;
let wrap = false;
if (x < min[0] || x > max[0]) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function grahamScan2
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const grahamScan2 = (pts: ReadonlyVec[], eps = EPS) => {
const num = pts.length;
if (num <= 3) return pts.slice();
let h = 1;
let i;
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function compareByKeys3
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
a: string | Fn<any, any>,
b: string | Fn<any, any>,
c: string | Fn<any, any>,
cmpA: Comparator<any> = compare,
cmpB: Comparator<any> = compare,
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function childForPoint
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
childForPoint(p: ReadonlyVec): Maybe<NodeInfo<T>> {
if (this.enabled) {
const children = this.children;
for (let i = children.length; i-- > 0; ) {
const n = children[i].childForPoint(p);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function floydRivest
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
buf: any[] | TypedArray,
k = 1,
cmp: Comparator<any> = compare,
left = 0,
right = buf.length - 1
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function quickSort
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
arr: any,
_cmp: Comparator<any> = compare,
_swap: Fn3<any, number, number, void> = swap,
start = 0,
end = arr.length - 1
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function clipped
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
src: Iterable<number[]>,
left: number,
top: number,
right: number,
bottom: number
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function floodFill
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
pred: Predicate2<number>,
x: number,
y: number,
width: number,
height: number
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function isolines
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
src: ReadonlyVec,
w: number,
h: number,
iso: number,
scale: ReadonlyVec | number = 1
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function withIndentation
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
lines: string[],
indent: string,
scopeStart: RegExp,
scopeEnd: RegExp,
level = 0
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function __files
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dir: string,
match: string | RegExp | Predicate<string> = "",
logger?: ILogger,
maxDepth = Infinity,
depth = 0
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function __dirs
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dir: string,
match: string | RegExp | Predicate<string> = "",
logger?: ILogger,
maxDepth = Infinity,
depth = 0
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function diffTree
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
diffTree(opts, parent, prev, curr, child?) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function createTree
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
createTree(opts, parent, tree, child?, init?) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function group
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
group: ($: Group) => {
const { attribs, children } = $;
const attr = { ...DEFAULT_ATTRIBS, ...__sdfAttribs(attribs) };
__validateAttribs(attr);
const $children = children.map(asSDF);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function concatA
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const concatA = <T>(...args: Nullable<ArrayLike<T>>[]) => {
const seqs: ArrayLike<T>[] = [];
for (let i = 0, n = args.length; i < n; i++) {
const x = args[i];
x && x.length && seqs.push(x);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function interleave
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function* interleave(...inputs: Iterable<any>[]) {
let n = inputs.length;
if (n === 0) {
illegalArity(0);
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function xfNest
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(parser: Parser<string>): ScopeTransform<string> =>
(scope, ctx) => {
if (!scope) return;
const src = scope.result || xfJoin({ ...scope })!.result;
const inner = defContext(src, ctx.opts);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"