Showing 4 of 11 total issues
Method represents has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def represents(name, scope = nil, options = {})
if Hash === scope
options = scope
scope = nil
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method representable_must_be_valid has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def representable_must_be_valid
unless representing.valid?
representing.errors.each do |attribute, message|
errors.add(attribute, message) unless errors[attribute].include?(message)
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method actable_must_be_valid has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def actable_must_be_valid
unless acting_as.valid?
acting_as.errors.each do |attribute, message|
errors.add(attribute, message) unless errors[attribute].include?(message)
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extendable_must_be_valid has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extendable_must_be_valid
unless extendable.valid?
extendable.errors.each do |attribute, message|
errors.add(attribute, message) unless errors[attribute].include?(message)
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"