Showing 30 of 1,009 total issues
Method make has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def make
src = @file
filename = [@basename, @format ? ".#{@format}" : ""].join
dst = TempfileFactory.new.generate(filename)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fog_public has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fog_public(style = default_style)
if @options.key?(:fog_public)
value = @options[:fog_public]
if value.respond_to?(:key?) && value.key?(style)
value[style]- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method content_type_extension has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def content_type_extension attachment, style_name
mime_type = MIME::Types[attachment.content_type]
extensions_for_mime_type = unless mime_type.empty?
mime_type.first.extensions
else- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method queue_all_for_delete has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def queue_all_for_delete #:nodoc:
return if !file?
unless @options[:preserve_files]
@queued_for_delete += [:original, *styles.keys].uniq.map do |style|
path(style) if exists?(style)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method transformation_command has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def transformation_command
scale, crop = @current_geometry.transformation_to(@target_geometry, crop?)
trans = []
trans << "-coalesce" if animated?
trans << "-auto-orient" if auto_orient- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method timestamp_as_needed has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def timestamp_as_needed(url, options)
if options[:timestamp] && timestamp_possible?
delimiter_char = url.match(/\?.+=/) ? '&' : '?'
"#{url}#{delimiter_char}#{@attachment.updated_at.to_s}"
else- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method current_attachments_styles has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.current_attachments_styles
Hash.new.tap do |current_styles|
Paperclip::AttachmentRegistry.each_definition do |klass, attachment_name, attachment_attributes|
# TODO: is it even possible to take into account Procs?
next if attachment_attributes[:styles].kind_of?(Proc)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(file, options = {}, attachment = nil)
super
geometry = options[:geometry].to_s
@crop = geometry[-1,1] == '#'- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method should_validate_attachment_size has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def should_validate_attachment_size name, options = {}
klass = self.name.gsub(/Test$/, '').constantize
min = options[:greater_than] || (options[:in] && options[:in].first) || 0
max = options[:less_than] || (options[:in] && options[:in].last) || (1.0/0)
range = (min..max)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method processor has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def processor(name) #:nodoc:
@known_processors ||= {}
if @known_processors[name.to_s]
@known_processors[name.to_s]
else- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"