File jquery-1.11.1.js
has 6829 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* jQuery JavaScript Library v1.11.1
* http://jquery.com/
*
* Includes Sizzle.js
Function Sizzle
has 1347 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(function( window ) {
var i,
support,
Expr,
Function ajax
has 240 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function( url, options ) {
// If url is an object, simulate pre-1.5 signature
if ( typeof url === "object" ) {
options = url;
Function setDocument
has 216 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setDocument = Sizzle.setDocument = function( node ) {
var hasCompare,
doc = node ? node.ownerDocument || node : preferredDoc,
parent = doc.defaultView;
Function Callbacks
has 128 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.Callbacks = function( options ) {
// Convert options from String-formatted to Object-formatted if needed
// (we check in cache first)
options = typeof options === "string" ?
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( event.pageX == null && original.clientX != null ) {
eventDoc = event.target.ownerDocument || document;
doc = eventDoc.documentElement;
body = eventDoc.body;
Function defaultPrefilter
has 105 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function defaultPrefilter( elem, props, opts ) {
/* jshint validthis: true */
var prop, value, toggle, tween, hooks, oldfire, display, checkDisplay,
anim = this,
orig = {},
Function trigger
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
trigger: function( event, data, elem, onlyHandlers ) {
var handle, ontype, cur,
bubbleType, special, tmp, i,
eventPath = [ elem || document ],
type = hasOwn.call( event, "type" ) ? event.type : event,
Function Animation
has 84 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Animation( elem, properties, options ) {
var result,
stopped,
index = 0,
length = animationPrefilters.length,
Function Sizzle
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Sizzle( selector, context, results, seed ) {
var match, elem, m, nodeType,
// QSA vars
i, groups, old, nid, newContext, newSelector;
Function buildFragment
has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
buildFragment: function( elems, context, scripts, selection ) {
var j, elem, contains,
tmp, tag, tbody, wrap,
l = elems.length,
Function add
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
add: function( elem, types, handler, data, selector ) {
var tmp, events, t, handleObjIn,
special, eventHandle, handleObj,
handlers, type, namespaces, origType,
elemData = jQuery._data( elem );
Function matcherFromGroupMatchers
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function matcherFromGroupMatchers( elementMatchers, setMatchers ) {
var bySet = setMatchers.length > 0,
byElement = elementMatchers.length > 0,
superMatcher = function( seed, context, xml, results, outermost ) {
var elem, j, matcher,
Function done
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function done( status, nativeStatusText, responses, headers ) {
var isSuccess, success, error, response, modified,
statusText = nativeStatusText;
// Called once
Function setMatcher
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function setMatcher( preFilter, selector, matcher, postFilter, postFinder, postSelector ) {
if ( postFilter && !postFilter[ expando ] ) {
postFilter = setMatcher( postFilter );
}
if ( postFinder && !postFinder[ expando ] ) {
Function superMatcher
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
superMatcher = function( seed, context, xml, results, outermost ) {
var elem, j, matcher,
matchedCount = 0,
i = "0",
unmatched = seed && [],
Function init
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
init = jQuery.fn.init = function( selector, context ) {
var match, elem;
// HANDLE: $(""), $(null), $(undefined), $(false)
if ( !selector ) {
Function send
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
send: function( headers, complete ) {
var i,
xhr = options.xhr(),
id = ++xhrId;
Function domManip
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
domManip: function( args, callback ) {
// Flatten any nested arrays
args = concat.apply( [], args );
Function Deferred
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Deferred: function( func ) {
var tuples = [
// action, add listener, listener list, final state
[ "resolve", "done", jQuery.Callbacks("once memory"), "resolved" ],
[ "reject", "fail", jQuery.Callbacks("once memory"), "rejected" ],
Function CHILD
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"CHILD": function( type, what, argument, first, last ) {
var simple = type.slice( 0, 3 ) !== "nth",
forward = type.slice( -4 ) !== "last",
ofType = what === "of-type";
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( forward && useCache ) {
// Seek `elem` from a previously-cached index
outerCache = parent[ expando ] || (parent[ expando ] = {});
cache = outerCache[ type ] || [];
nodeIndex = cache[0] === dirruns && cache[1];
Function ajaxConvert
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ajaxConvert( s, response, jqXHR, isSuccess ) {
var conv2, current, conv, tmp, prev,
converters = {},
// Work with a copy of dataTypes in case we need to modify it for conversion
dataTypes = s.dataTypes.slice();
Function remove
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
remove: function( elem, types, handler, selector, mappedTypes ) {
var j, handleObj, tmp,
origCount, t, events,
special, handlers, type,
namespaces, origType,
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( ( mappedTypes || origType === handleObj.origType ) &&
( !handler || handler.guid === handleObj.guid ) &&
( !tmp || tmp.test( handleObj.namespace ) ) &&
( !selector || selector === handleObj.selector || selector === "**" && handleObj.selector ) ) {
handlers.splice( j, 1 );
Function internalRemoveData
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function internalRemoveData( elem, name, pvt ) {
if ( !jQuery.acceptData( elem ) ) {
return;
}
Function internalData
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function internalData( elem, name, data, pvt /* Internal Use Only */ ) {
if ( !jQuery.acceptData( elem ) ) {
return;
}
Function select
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
select = Sizzle.select = function( selector, context, results, seed ) {
var i, tokens, token, type, find,
compiled = typeof selector === "function" && selector,
match = !seed && tokenize( (selector = compiled.selector || selector) );
Function tokenize
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
tokenize = Sizzle.tokenize = function( selector, parseOnly ) {
var matched, match, tokens, type,
soFar, groups, preFilters,
cached = tokenCache[ selector + " " ];
Function matcherFromTokens
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function matcherFromTokens( tokens ) {
var checkContext, matcher, j,
len = tokens.length,
leadingRelative = Expr.relative[ tokens[0].type ],
implicitRelative = leadingRelative || Expr.relative[" "],
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( typeof value === "string" && !rnoInnerhtml.test( value ) &&
( support.htmlSerialize || !rnoshimcache.test( value ) ) &&
( support.leadingWhitespace || !rleadingWhitespace.test( value ) ) &&
!wrapMap[ (rtagName.exec( value ) || [ "", "" ])[ 1 ].toLowerCase() ] ) {
Function stop
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
stop: function( type, clearQueue, gotoEnd ) {
var stopQueue = function( hooks ) {
var stop = hooks.stop;
delete hooks.stop;
stop( gotoEnd );
Function val
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
val: function( value ) {
var hooks, ret, isFunction,
elem = this[0];
if ( !arguments.length ) {
Function on
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
on: function( types, selector, data, fn, /*INTERNAL*/ one ) {
var type, origFn;
// Types can be a map of types/handlers
if ( typeof types === "object" ) {
Function extend
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.extend = jQuery.fn.extend = function() {
var src, copyIsArray, copy, name, options, clone,
target = arguments[0] || {},
i = 1,
length = arguments.length,
Function addCombinator
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function addCombinator( matcher, combinator, base ) {
var dir = combinator.dir,
checkNonElements = base && dir === "parentNode",
doneName = done++;
Function computeStyleTests
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function computeStyleTests() {
// Minified: var b,c,d,j
var div, body, container, contents;
body = document.getElementsByTagName( "body" )[ 0 ];
Function each
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
each: function( obj, callback, args ) {
var value,
i = 0,
length = obj.length,
isArray = isArraylike( obj );
Function ajaxHandleResponses
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ajaxHandleResponses( s, jqXHR, responses ) {
var firstDataType, ct, finalDataType, type,
contents = s.contents,
dataTypes = s.dataTypes;
Function when
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
when: function( subordinate /* , ..., subordinateN */ ) {
var i = 0,
resolveValues = slice.call( arguments ),
length = resolveValues.length,
Function showHide
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function showHide( elements, show ) {
var display, elem, hidden,
values = [],
index = 0,
length = elements.length;
Function access
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var access = jQuery.access = function( elems, fn, key, value, chainable, emptyGet, raw ) {
var i = 0,
length = elems.length,
bulk = key == null;
Function clone
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
clone: function( elem, dataAndEvents, deepDataAndEvents ) {
var destElements, node, clone, i, srcElements,
inPage = jQuery.contains( elem.ownerDocument, elem );
if ( support.html5Clone || jQuery.isXMLDoc(elem) || !rnoshimcache.test( "<" + elem.nodeName + ">" ) ) {
Function dispatch
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dispatch: function( event ) {
// Make a writable jQuery.Event from the native event object
event = jQuery.event.fix( event );
Function style
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
style: function( elem, name, value, extra ) {
// Don't set styles on text and comment nodes
if ( !elem || elem.nodeType === 3 || elem.nodeType === 8 || !elem.style ) {
return;
}
Function setOffset
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setOffset: function( elem, options, i ) {
var curPosition, curLeft, curCSSTop, curTop, curOffset, curCSSLeft, calculatePosition,
position = jQuery.css( elem, "position" ),
curElem = jQuery( elem ),
props = {};
Function cleanData
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
cleanData: function( elems, /* internal */ acceptData ) {
var elem, type, id, data,
i = 0,
internalKey = jQuery.expando,
cache = jQuery.cache,
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
} else if ( useCache && (cache = (elem[ expando ] || (elem[ expando ] = {}))[ type ]) && cache[0] === dirruns ) {
diff = cache[1];
// xml :nth-child(...) or :nth-last-child(...) or :nth(-last)?-of-type(...)
} else {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( start && start[ 3 ] !== unit ) {
// Trust units reported by jQuery.css
unit = unit || start[ 3 ];
// Make sure we update the tween properties later on
Function fixCloneNodeIssues
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function fixCloneNodeIssues( src, dest ) {
var nodeName, e, data;
// We do not need to do anything for non-Elements
if ( dest.nodeType !== 1 ) {
Function load
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.fn.load = function( url, params, callback ) {
if ( typeof url !== "string" && _load ) {
return _load.apply( this, arguments );
}
Function addClass
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
addClass: function( value ) {
var classes, elem, cur, clazz, j, finalValue,
i = 0,
len = this.length,
proceed = typeof value === "string" && value;
Function data
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
data: function( key, value ) {
var i, name, data,
elem = this[0],
attrs = elem && elem.attributes;
Function removeClass
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
removeClass: function( value ) {
var classes, elem, cur, clazz, j, finalValue,
i = 0,
len = this.length,
proceed = arguments.length === 0 || typeof value === "string" && value;
Function handlers
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
handlers: function( event, handlers ) {
var sel, handleObj, matches, i,
handlerQueue = [],
delegateCount = handlers.delegateCount,
cur = event.target;
Function attr
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
attr: function( elem, name, value ) {
var hooks, ret,
nType = elem.nodeType;
// don't get/set attributes on text, comment and attribute nodes
Function promise
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.ready.promise = function( obj ) {
if ( !readyList ) {
readyList = jQuery.Deferred();
Function html
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
html: function( value ) {
return access( this, function( value ) {
var elem = this[ 0 ] || {},
i = 0,
l = this.length;
Function toggleClass
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
toggleClass: function( value, stateVal ) {
var type = typeof value;
if ( typeof stateVal === "boolean" && type === "string" ) {
return stateVal ? this.addClass( value ) : this.removeClass( value );
Function fix
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
fix: function( event ) {
if ( event[ jQuery.expando ] ) {
return event;
}
Function finish
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
finish: function( type ) {
if ( type !== false ) {
type = type || "fx";
}
return this.each(function() {
Function setup
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setup: function() {
if ( rformElems.test( this.nodeName ) ) {
// IE doesn't fire change on a check/radio until blur; trigger it on click
// after a propertychange. Eat the blur-change in special.change.handle.
Function propFilter
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function propFilter( props, specialEasing ) {
var index, name, easing, value, hooks;
// camelCase, specialEasing and expand cssHook pass
for ( index in props ) {
Function off
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
off: function( types, selector, fn ) {
var handleObj, type;
if ( types && types.preventDefault && types.handleObj ) {
// ( event ) dispatched jQuery.Event
handleObj = types.handleObj;
Function offset
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
offset: function( options ) {
if ( arguments.length ) {
return options === undefined ?
this :
this.each(function( i ) {
Function *
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"*": [ function( prop, value ) {
var tween = this.createTween( prop, value ),
target = tween.cur(),
parts = rfxnum.exec( value ),
unit = parts && parts[ 3 ] || ( jQuery.cssNumber[ prop ] ? "" : "px" ),
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( tokens.length > 2 && (token = tokens[0]).type === "ID" &&
support.getById && context.nodeType === 9 && documentIsHTML &&
Expr.relative[ tokens[1].type ] ) {
context = ( Expr.find["ID"]( token.matches[0].replace(runescape, funescape), context ) || [] )[0];
Function access
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var access = jQuery.access = function( elems, fn, key, value, chainable, emptyGet, raw ) {
Function setMatcher
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function setMatcher( preFilter, selector, matcher, postFilter, postFinder, postSelector ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( deleteExpando ) {
delete elem[ internalKey ];
} else if ( typeof elem.removeAttribute !== strundefined ) {
elem.removeAttribute( internalKey );
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( rscriptType.test( node.type || "" ) &&
!jQuery._data( node, "globalEval" ) && jQuery.contains( doc, node ) ) {
if ( node.src ) {
// Optional AJAX dependency, but won't run scripts if not present
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( copyIsArray ) {
copyIsArray = false;
clone = src && jQuery.isArray(src) ? src : [];
} else {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( ofType ? node.nodeName.toLowerCase() === name : node.nodeType === 1 ) {
return false;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( ( ofType ? node.nodeName.toLowerCase() === name : node.nodeType === 1 ) && ++diff ) {
// Cache the index of each encountered element
if ( useCache ) {
(node[ expando ] || (node[ expando ] = {}))[ type ] = [ dirruns, diff ];
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( hasScripts ) {
jQuery.merge( scripts, getAll( node, "script" ) );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if ( copy !== undefined ) {
target[ name ] = copy;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !status && options.isLocal && !options.crossDomain ) {
status = responses.text ? 200 : 404;
// IE - #1450: sometimes returns 1223 when it should be 204
} else if ( status === 1223 ) {
status = 204;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
while ( j-- ) {
if ( jQuery.nodeName( (tbody = elem.childNodes[j]), "tbody" ) && !tbody.childNodes.length ) {
elem.removeChild( tbody );
}
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ( type in data.events ) {
if ( special[ type ] ) {
jQuery.event.remove( elem, type );
// This is a shortcut to avoid jQuery.event.remove's overhead
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( elem && elem.parentNode ) {
// Handle the case where IE, Opera, and Webkit return items
// by name instead of ID
if ( elem.id === m ) {
results.push( elem );
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ( match in context ) {
// Properties of context are called as methods if possible
if ( jQuery.isFunction( this[ match ] ) ) {
this[ match ]( context[ match ] );
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( conv && s[ "throws" ] ) {
response = conv( response );
} else {
try {
response = conv( response );
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( context.ownerDocument && (elem = context.ownerDocument.getElementById( m )) &&
contains( context, elem ) && elem.id === m ) {
results.push( elem );
return results;
}
Function init
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
init: function( elem, options, prop, end, easing, unit ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( (newCache[ 2 ] = matcher( elem, context, xml )) ) {
return true;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( name in thisCache ) {
name = [ name ];
} else {
name = name.split(" ");
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
while ( cur.indexOf( " " + clazz + " " ) >= 0 ) {
cur = cur.replace( " " + clazz + " ", " " );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( xhr.readyState !== 4 ) {
xhr.abort();
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( (event.result = ret) === false ) {
event.preventDefault();
event.stopPropagation();
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ( conv2 in converters ) {
// If conv2 outputs current
tmp = conv2.split( " " );
if ( tmp[ 1 ] === current ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( (elem = matcherOut[i]) ) {
// Restore matcherIn since elem is not yet a final match
temp.push( (matcherIn[i] = elem) );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !(unmatched[i] || setMatched[i]) ) {
setMatched[i] = pop.call( results );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( cur.indexOf( " " + clazz + " " ) < 0 ) {
cur += clazz + " ";
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( Expr.relative[ tokens[j].type ] ) {
break;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( elem.id !== match[2] ) {
return rootjQuery.find( selector );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( attrs[ i ] ) {
name = attrs[ i ].name;
if ( name.indexOf( "data-" ) === 0 ) {
name = jQuery.camelCase( name.slice(5) );
dataAttr( elem, name, data[ name ] );
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( matches[ sel ] === undefined ) {
matches[ sel ] = handleObj.needsContext ?
jQuery( sel, this ).index( cur ) >= 0 :
jQuery.find( sel, this, null, [ cur ] ).length;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( matches[ sel ] ) {
matches.push( handleObj );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( typeof xhr.responseText === "string" ) {
responses.text = xhr.responseText;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !selector ) {
push.apply( results, seed );
return results;
}
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( (!id || !cache[id] || (!pvt && !cache[id].data)) && data === undefined && typeof name === "string" ) {
return;
}
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( s.crossDomain == null ) {
parts = rurl.exec( s.url.toLowerCase() );
s.crossDomain = !!( parts &&
( parts[ 1 ] !== ajaxLocParts[ 1 ] || parts[ 2 ] !== ajaxLocParts[ 2 ] ||
( parts[ 3 ] || ( parts[ 1 ] === "http:" ? "80" : "443" ) ) !==
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( support.matchesSelector && documentIsHTML &&
( !rbuggyMatches || !rbuggyMatches.test( expr ) ) &&
( !rbuggyQSA || !rbuggyQSA.test( expr ) ) ) {
try {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( matcher[ expando ] ) {
// Find the next relative operator (if any) for proper handling
j = ++i;
for ( ; j < len; j++ ) {
if ( Expr.relative[ tokens[j].type ] ) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( !support.opacity ) {
jQuery.cssHooks.opacity = {
get: function( elem, computed ) {
// IE uses filters for opacity
return ropacity.test( (computed && elem.currentStyle ? elem.currentStyle.filter : elem.style.filter) || "" ) ?
Function CHILD
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"CHILD": function( type, what, argument, first, last ) {
Function remove
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
remove: function( elem, types, handler, selector, mappedTypes ) {
Function on
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
on: function( types, selector, data, fn, /*INTERNAL*/ one ) {
Function Tween
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Tween( elem, options, prop, end, easing ) {
Function augmentWidthOrHeight
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function augmentWidthOrHeight( elem, name, extra, isBorderBox, styles ) {
Function condense
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function condense( unmatched, map, filter, context, xml ) {
Function add
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
add: function( elem, types, handler, data, selector ) {
Function superMatcher
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
superMatcher = function( seed, context, xml, results, outermost ) {
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return results;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return results;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return typeof rootjQuery.ready !== "undefined" ?
rootjQuery.ready( selector ) :
// Execute immediately if ready is not present
selector( jQuery );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ret;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return sortInput ?
( indexOf.call( sortInput, a ) - indexOf.call( sortInput, b ) ) :
0;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return jQuery.makeArray( selector, this );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.constructor( context ).find( selector );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ( context || rootjQuery ).find( selector );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return key === undefined || hasOwn.call( obj, key );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return compare & 4 ? -1 : 1;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return results;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return select( selector.replace( rtrim, "$1" ), context, results, seed );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ret == null ?
undefined :
ret;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return results;
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
event.pageY = original.clientY + ( doc && doc.scrollTop || body && body.scrollTop || 0 ) - ( doc && doc.clientTop || body && body.clientTop || 0 );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
event.pageX = original.clientX + ( doc && doc.scrollLeft || body && body.scrollLeft || 0 ) - ( doc && doc.clientLeft || body && body.clientLeft || 0 );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( value ) ) {
return this.each(function( j ) {
jQuery( this ).addClass( value.call( this, j, this.className ) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( value ) ) {
return this.each(function( j ) {
jQuery( this ).removeClass( value.call( this, j, this.className ) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( html ) ) {
return this.each(function(i) {
jQuery(this).wrapInner( html.call(this, i) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( html ) ) {
return this.each(function(i) {
jQuery(this).wrapAll( html.call(this, i) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"odd": createPositionalPseudo(function( matchIndexes, length ) {
var i = 1;
for ( ; i < length; i += 2 ) {
matchIndexes.push( i );
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"even": createPositionalPseudo(function( matchIndexes, length ) {
var i = 0;
for ( ; i < length; i += 2 ) {
matchIndexes.push( i );
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (support.deleteExpando == null) {
// Support: IE<9
support.deleteExpando = true;
try {
delete div.test;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (support.deleteExpando == null) {
// Support: IE<9
support.deleteExpando = true;
try {
delete div.test;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
cur = elem.nodeType === 1 && ( elem.className ?
( " " + elem.className + " " ).replace( rclass, " " ) :
" "
);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
cur = elem.nodeType === 1 && ( elem.className ?
( " " + elem.className + " " ).replace( rclass, " " ) :
""
);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76