Showing 11 of 26 total issues
Method up
has 165 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def up
MongoDatabaseCleaner.clean
create_table :users do |t|
t.string :name
Method create_from_table
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_from_table(model_name, table, extra = {})
factory_name = model_name.gsub(/\W+/, '_').downcase.singularize.to_sym
is_singular = model_name.to_s.singularize == model_name.to_s
hashes = if is_singular
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method voluntary_menu_options
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.voluntary_menu_options
{
organizations: {
after_resource_has_many: Proc.new do |organization, options|
organization.item :units, I18n.t('proposition_units.index.title'), organization_proposition_units_path(@organization) do |units|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method path_to
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def path_to(page_name)
case page_name
when /^the home\s?page$/
'/'
Method down
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def down
unless (Product::Recruiting rescue nil)
create_table 'vacancies', force: true do |t|
t.string 'type'
t.integer 'project_id'
Method create_from_table
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_from_table(model_name, table, extra = {})
factory_name = model_name.gsub(/\W+/, '_').downcase.singularize.to_sym
is_singular = model_name.to_s.singularize == model_name.to_s
hashes = if is_singular
Method set_candidature_defaults
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_candidature_defaults(attributes)
attributes[:user_id] ||= @me.id unless attributes[:user] || attributes[:user_id] || !@me
attributes[:vacancy_id] ||= Vacancy.last.id unless attributes[:vacancy_id] || Vacancy.all.none?
attributes[:offeror_id] ||= Vacancy.find(attributes[:vacancy_id]).project.user_id if attributes[:vacancy_id]
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_value
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_value(hash, attribute)
value = hash[attribute]
if value.match '@'
if eval(value)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_vacancy_defaults
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_vacancy_defaults(attributes)
attributes[:user_id] ||= @me.id unless attributes[:user_id] || !@me
attributes[:project_id] ||= Project.last.id unless attributes[:project_id] || Project.all.none?
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_project_defaults
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_project_defaults(attributes)
attributes[:user_id] ||= @me.id if @me && !attributes[:user_id]
attributes[:product_id] ||= @product.id if @product && !attributes[:product_id]
attributes[:area_ids] ||= [Area.last.id] if Area.any? && !attributes[:area_ids]
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method up
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def up
Product.each do |product|
next if product.klass_name.present?
if product.name == 'Product'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"