Function has a complexity of 10. Open
RedisUtils.prototype.connect = function (hosts, options, defaultExpireTime, cluster) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function connect
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
RedisUtils.prototype.connect = function (hosts, options, defaultExpireTime, cluster) {
// validation schema
var schema = joi.array().required().items(
joi.object().keys({
host : joi.string().required().empty().default('127.0.0.1'),
Function connect
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
RedisUtils.prototype.connect = function (hosts, options, defaultExpireTime, cluster) {
// validation schema
var schema = joi.array().required().items(
joi.object().keys({
host : joi.string().required().empty().default('127.0.0.1'),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function listenEvents
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
RedisUtils.prototype.listenEvents = function () {
// default events
var events = [
{ key : 'connect', message : 'is connecting' },
{ key : 'ready', message : 'is ready' },
Unexpected trailing comma. Open
cert : joi.string().optional().empty(),
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
require or disallow trailing commas (comma-dangle)
Trailing commas in object literals are valid according to the ECMAScript 5 (and ECMAScript 3!) spec. However, IE8 (when not in IE8 document mode) and below will throw an error when it encounters trailing commas in JavaScript.
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
};
Trailing commas simplify adding and removing items to objects and arrays, since only the lines you are modifying must be touched. Another argument in favor of trailing commas is that it improves the clarity of diffs when an item is added or removed from an object or array:
Less clear:
var foo = {
- bar: "baz",
- qux: "quux"
+ bar: "baz"
};
More clear:
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
- qux: "quux",
};
Rule Details
This rule enforces consistent use of trailing commas in object and array literals.
Options
This rule has a string option or an object option:
{
"comma-dangle": ["error", "never"],
// or
"comma-dangle": ["error", {
"arrays": "never",
"objects": "never",
"imports": "never",
"exports": "never",
"functions": "ignore",
}]
}
-
"never"
(default) disallows trailing commas -
"always"
requires trailing commas -
"always-multiline"
requires trailing commas when the last element or property is in a different line than the closing]
or}
and disallows trailing commas when the last element or property is on the same line as the closing]
or}
-
"only-multiline"
allows (but does not require) trailing commas when the last element or property is in a different line than the closing]
or}
and disallows trailing commas when the last element or property is on the same line as the closing]
or}
Trailing commas in function declarations and function calls are valid syntax since ECMAScript 2017; however, the string option does not check these situations for backwards compatibility.
You can also use an object option to configure this rule for each type of syntax.
Each of the following options can be set to "never"
, "always"
, "always-multiline"
, "only-multiline"
, or "ignore"
.
The default for each option is "never"
unless otherwise specified.
-
arrays
is for array literals and array patterns of destructuring. (e.g.let [a,] = [1,];
) -
objects
is for object literals and object patterns of destructuring. (e.g.let {a,} = {a: 1};
) -
imports
is for import declarations of ES Modules. (e.g.import {a,} from "foo";
) -
exports
is for export declarations of ES Modules. (e.g.export {a,};
) -
functions
is for function declarations and function calls. (e.g.(function(a,){ })(b,);
)
functions
is set to"ignore"
by default for consistency with the string option.
never
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the default "never"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "never"]*/
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
};
var arr = [1,2,];
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
});
Examples of correct code for this rule with the default "never"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "never"]*/
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
};
var arr = [1,2];
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
});
always
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "always"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "always"]*/
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
};
var arr = [1,2];
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
});
Examples of correct code for this rule with the "always"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "always"]*/
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
};
var arr = [1,2,];
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
});
always-multiline
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "always-multiline"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "always-multiline"]*/
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
};
var foo = { bar: "baz", qux: "quux", };
var arr = [1,2,];
var arr = [1,
2,];
var arr = [
1,
2
];
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
});
Examples of correct code for this rule with the "always-multiline"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "always-multiline"]*/
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
};
var foo = {bar: "baz", qux: "quux"};
var arr = [1,2];
var arr = [1,
2];
var arr = [
1,
2,
];
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
});
only-multiline
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "only-multiline"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "only-multiline"]*/
var foo = { bar: "baz", qux: "quux", };
var arr = [1,2,];
var arr = [1,
2,];
Examples of correct code for this rule with the "only-multiline"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "only-multiline"]*/
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
};
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
};
var foo = {bar: "baz", qux: "quux"};
var arr = [1,2];
var arr = [1,
2];
var arr = [
1,
2,
];
var arr = [
1,
2
];
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
});
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
});
functions
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the {"functions": "never"}
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", {"functions": "never"}]*/
function foo(a, b,) {
}
foo(a, b,);
new foo(a, b,);
Examples of correct code for this rule with the {"functions": "never"}
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", {"functions": "never"}]*/
function foo(a, b) {
}
foo(a, b);
new foo(a, b);
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the {"functions": "always"}
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", {"functions": "always"}]*/
function foo(a, b) {
}
foo(a, b);
new foo(a, b);
Examples of correct code for this rule with the {"functions": "always"}
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", {"functions": "always"}]*/
function foo(a, b,) {
}
foo(a, b,);
new foo(a, b,);
When Not To Use It
You can turn this rule off if you are not concerned with dangling commas. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
unnecessary '.call()'. Open
this.remove.call(this, keys);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow unnecessary .call()
and .apply()
. (no-useless-call)
The function invocation can be written by Function.prototype.call()
and Function.prototype.apply()
.
But Function.prototype.call()
and Function.prototype.apply()
are slower than the normal function invocation.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed to flag usage of Function.prototype.call()
and Function.prototype.apply()
that can be replaced with the normal function invocation.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-useless-call: "error"*/
// These are same as `foo(1, 2, 3);`
foo.call(undefined, 1, 2, 3);
foo.apply(undefined, [1, 2, 3]);
foo.call(null, 1, 2, 3);
foo.apply(null, [1, 2, 3]);
// These are same as `obj.foo(1, 2, 3);`
obj.foo.call(obj, 1, 2, 3);
obj.foo.apply(obj, [1, 2, 3]);
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-useless-call: "error"*/
// The `this` binding is different.
foo.call(obj, 1, 2, 3);
foo.apply(obj, [1, 2, 3]);
obj.foo.call(null, 1, 2, 3);
obj.foo.apply(null, [1, 2, 3]);
obj.foo.call(otherObj, 1, 2, 3);
obj.foo.apply(otherObj, [1, 2, 3]);
// The argument list is variadic.
foo.apply(undefined, args);
foo.apply(null, args);
obj.foo.apply(obj, args);
Known Limitations
This rule compares code statically to check whether or not thisArg
is changed.
So if the code about thisArg
is a dynamic expression, this rule cannot judge correctly.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-useless-call: "error"*/
a[i++].foo.call(a[i++], 1, 2, 3);
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-useless-call: "error"*/
a[++i].foo.call(a[i], 1, 2, 3);
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to be notified about unnecessary .call()
and .apply()
, you can safely disable this rule.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (l) {
// is a valid logger ?
if (_.isUndefined(l) || _.isNull(l)) {
logger.warning('[ RedisUtils.constructor ] - Invalid logger given. Use internal logger');
// assign
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 81.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (_.has(this.hosts, 'tls.key')) {
// define ca
this.hosts.tls.key = fs.readFileSync(this.hosts.tls.key);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (_.has(this.hosts, 'tls.cert')) {
// define ca
this.hosts.tls.cert = fs.readFileSync(this.hosts.tls.cert);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (validate.error) {
// log error message
this.logger.warning([ '[ RedisUtils.connect ] - Invalid host config given :',
validate.error ] .join(' '));
// default invalid statement
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76