Showing 48 of 48 total issues
Method descriptions
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def descriptions # rubocop:disable MethodLength
@descriptions ||= {
'-f' => [
'Force processing even if the current Git repository is not',
'clean.'
Class Converter
has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Converter < BaseRewriter # rubocop:disable ClassLength
include Syntax::Dispatcher
attr_reader :spec_suite, :project, :config, :report
Method setup_parser
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def setup_parser # rubocop:disable MethodLength
@parser = create_parser
define_option('-f', '--force') do
config.forced = true
Method example
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def example
return @example if instance_variable_defined?(:@example)
@example = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method const_name
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def const_name(node)
return nil if node.nil? || !node.const_type?
const_names = []
const_node = node
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method each_forward_chained_node
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def each_forward_chained_node(origin_node, mode = nil)
return to_enum(__method__, origin_node, mode) unless block_given?
yield origin_node if mode == :include_origin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method each_backward_chained_node
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def each_backward_chained_node(origin_node, mode = nil)
return to_enum(__method__, origin_node, mode) unless block_given?
yield origin_node if mode == :include_origin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_explicit_type_metadata!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_explicit_type_metadata!
return unless rspec_rails?
return unless method_name == :describe
return if explicit_type_metadata?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_rspec_configure
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_rspec_configure(rspec_configure)
if config.convert?(:deprecated)
rspec_configure.convert_deprecated_options!
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method block_node_taken_by_with_method_with_no_normal_args
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def block_node_taken_by_with_method_with_no_normal_args
each_backward_chained_node(node, :child_as_second_arg) do |chained_node, child_node|
next unless chained_node.block_type?
return nil unless child_node.children[1] == :with
return nil if child_node.children[2]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method runtime_subject_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def runtime_subject_data(key = nil)
unless instance_variable_defined?(:@runtime_subject_data)
node = explicit_subject? ? expectation.subject_node : expectation.node
@runtime_subject_data = runtime_data[node]
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method special_block_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def special_block_type(block_node) # rubocop:disable MethodLength, CyclomaticComplexity
send_node = block_node.children.first
receiver_node, method_name, = *send_node
if const_name(receiver_node) == 'RSpec'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_should_receive
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_should_receive(should_receive)
if should_receive.useless_expectation?
if config.convert?(:deprecated)
if config.convert?(:stub)
should_receive.allowize_useless_expectation!(config.negative_form_of_to)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method convert!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def convert!
if block_node
insert_after(block_node.loc.begin, " |#{block_arg_name}|") unless block_has_argument?
replace(selector_range, block_arg_name.to_s) unless method_name == block_arg_name
block_node.metadata[:added_example_block_arg] = true
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ruby_files_in_directory
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ruby_files_in_directory(directory_path)
ruby_file_paths = []
Find.find(directory_path) do |path|
next unless File.file?(path)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method replacement_subject_source
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def replacement_subject_source(base_subject)
source = case base_subject
when String then base_subject
when AST::Node then base_subject_source(base_subject)
else fail "Invalid base subject #{base_subject}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_any_instance_block
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_any_instance_block(messaging_host)
return unless messaging_host
return unless rspec_version.rspec_2_99?
return unless config.convert?(:deprecated)
return unless config.add_receiver_arg_to_any_instance_implementation_block?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(node, expectation, runtime_data = nil, project = nil, source_rewriter = nil, report = nil)
Method any_instance_target_node
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def any_instance_target_node
return nil unless subject_node.send_type?
return nil unless subject_node.children.count == 2
receiver_node, method_name = *subject_node
return nil unless receiver_node
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method chainable_source
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def chainable_source(node)
fail "Invalid argument #{node}" unless node.send_type?
map = node.loc
source = map.expression.source
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"