Showing 5 of 7 total issues
Method send has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def send
raise 'Too few wallets in the pool' if @wallets.all.count < 2
paid = []
all = @wallets.all
Tempfile.open do |f|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method send has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def send
start = Time.now
sent = Zold::Stress::Pmnts.new(
pvt: @pvt, wallets: @wallets,
remotes: @remotes, stats: @stats,Method match has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def match
total = 0
@air.fetch.each do |p|
next unless @wallets.acq(p[:target], &:exists?)
t = @wallets.acq(p[:target], &:txns).find { |x| x.details == p[:details] && x.bnf == p[:source] }- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_s has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_s
[
"#{tps.round(2)} tps",
%w[update push pull paid arrived].map do |m|
if @stats.exists?(m)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method put has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def put(metric, value)
raise "Invalid type of \"#{value}\" (#{value.class.name})" unless value.is_a?(Integer) || value.is_a?(Float)
@mutex.synchronize do
@history[metric] = [] unless @history[metric]
@history[metric] << { time: Time.now, value: value }- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"