18F/18f.gsa.gov

View on GitHub
_posts/2015-06-08-data-act-data-act-explainer.md

Summary

Maintainability
Test Coverage
---
title: "How DATA Act implementation is opening up federal spending"
date: 2015-06-09
layout: post
authors:
- becky
tags:
- open data
- open government
- rfp ghostwriting
- acquisition services
- transparency
- data act

excerpt: "In May 2014, President Obama signed the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act (DATA Act) into law. Once implemented, the DATA Act will make it easier to understand how the federal government spends money."
description: "In May 2014, President Obama signed the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act (DATA Act) into law. Once implemented, the DATA Act will make it easier to understand how the federal government spends money."
image: /assets/blog/data-act-implementation/data-act-reporting.jpg
---
In May 2014, President Obama signed the [Digital Accountability and Transparency Act (DATA Act)](http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-113publ101/pdf/PLAW-113publ101.pdf)
into law. Once implemented, the DATA Act will make it easier to
understand how the federal government spends money. The Department of
the Treasury and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) are leading
the implementation, and Treasury has partnered with 18F Consulting to
help with a few aspects of the project:

-   Lead outreach for Treasury’s [online collaboration space](http://fedspendingtransparency.github.io/) that solicits public feedback about federal spending data.
-   Coach vendors and Treasury team on developing pilot projects using agile methodologies.
-   Organize and develop the first DATA Act pilot that uses real agency financial and awards data.
-   [Request for Proposal (RFP) Ghostwriting](https://18f.gsa.gov/2015/03/30/new-rfp-ghostwriting-service-to-improve-contract-success/).
-   Perform three to four weeks of user research and discovery to better understand the different audiences and their needs when accessing federal spending data.

The first order of DATA Act business on this blog, however, is to
explain what this law is and why it’s important.

According to the [Citizen’s Guide to the Fiscal Year 2014](http://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/rpt/finrep/fr/14frusg/CitizenGuide_2014.pdf),
the government spent $3.8 trillion last year. For most people, that
$3.8 trillion figure has little practical value — we need more detail
to really understand federal spending. What kind of programs and
projects does the federal government fund? Who’s getting the money? What
local businesses have federal contracts? Are those amounts increasing or decreasing?

Right now, these questions aren’t easy to answer. The DATA Act intends
to change that.

## Why it’s hard

The federal spending lifecycle has many steps, and there are many
systems in place to track money as it moves from a congressional
appropriation to an actual payment. These systems don’t have a common
way to tie money back to specific programs and projects, and that’s what
the DATA Act proposes to fix.

[![Diagram of government appropriation reporting]({{site.baseurl}}/assets/blog/data-act-implementation/data-act-reporting.jpg)](http://www.datacoalition.org/what-is-data-transparency/data-act/)

*Image courtesy of the [Data Transparency
Coalition](http://www.datacoalition.org/what-is-data-transparency/data-act/)*

For example, let’s say Congress appropriates $30 billion for student
financial aid as part of the annual budget. That $30 billion gets a
Treasury account number (officially called a Treasury Account Symbol
or TAS), and the applicable agency can start deciding how to use it. In
this case, that agency would be the Department of Education, and
throughout the year it will use the $30 billion to grant individual
student financial aid awards.

However, the Department of Education — like all agencies — doesn’t use
the Treasury Account Symbol as the only way to categorize money. Because
the Department uses that $30 billion of financial aid money to fund
several different initiatives, the Department may allocate those dollars
to more specific buckets like Pell grants, work-study, and scholarships
for veterans’ dependents.

![Diagram of account labeling]({{site.baseurl}}/assets/blog/data-act-implementation/data-act-labels.jpg)

When Treasury pays money to a recipient of student financial aid, it
debits the money from the high-level $30 billion account. The specifics
live within the Department of Education and aren’t associated with
Treasury’s payment records. In this context, think of the Treasury like a bank. It keeps account of the money your agency (or program) has, but you're responsible for keeping track of what the payments mean.

As a result, we can answer questions like “how much did the U.S. spend
on student financial aid last year?” But we can’t answer some of the
more interesting questions without digging into the financial and awards
systems at individual agencies:

-   Which universities received Federal Work-Study funds last year?
-   What’s the ten-year trend for total Pell grants awarded?

## How the DATA Act will help

There’s nothing wrong with agencies organizing money differently than
the high-level Treasury accounts. Agencies do (and should) have the
autonomy to track their appropriated funds in a way that aligns with how
they deliver services. The DATA Act won’t change that.

Instead, the DATA Act mandates a common federal spending **data
standard**. A simple way to think of this common data standard (though
it’s much more nuanced) is a list of spending information that agencies
must track each time they award money. The list will include
awards-level information (specifics about the program or project being
funded, who and where the money is going to, etc.) as well as
information about the Treasury account that the award was paid out of.

Agencies have all of this information, but it usually lives in several
different systems. The DATA Act requires them to pull it all into a
single format (i.e., the federal spending data standard) and
periodically submit it to Treasury. This will be hard work. But once the
DATA Act is implemented, there will be one single place that houses
information about the broader spending lifecycle for the entire federal
government. This single place will be USASpending.gov (or a replacement
website), where the public will be able to:

-   Track dollars actually spent against the dollars appropriated by Congress
-   Track overall spending by high-level categories such as personnel compensation and contracts
-   Find out how much money is available in a Treasury account

The DATA Act is a large undertaking, and it will be several years before
this unified picture of federal spending emerges. Treasury is laying the
groundwork during this early stage of the work to ensure an open-source,
transparent, and user-centric implementation and is promoting a standard
that will be able to evolve as the federal government changes. 18F is
excited that the data standard is being developed in a way that matches
our values — openly and iteratively — and is proud to be a part of the
team.

By working in this fashion, the public will have a source for
information that meets their needs in both the short-term and as the
project naturally evolves. Building the common data standard this way
should also save the government millions in development costs, and
planning for evolution and iteration in the data standard will save even
more. 18F is proud to be a part of this effort and looks forward to
working with Treasury to make the process a meaningful and effective one.