Showing 11 of 11 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
assert response.json['resources'] == [
{'id': 1, 'name': 'Tom', 'dob': '1980-02-26', 'number_of_pets': 0},
{'id': 3, 'name': 'Harry', 'dob': '1972-11-24', 'number_of_pets': 2},
{'id': 2, 'name': 'Dick', 'dob': '1982-03-14', 'number_of_pets': 3},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
assert response.json['resources'] == [
{'id': 2, 'name': 'Dick', 'dob': '1982-03-14', 'number_of_pets': 3},
{'id': 3, 'name': 'Harry', 'dob': '1972-11-24', 'number_of_pets': 2},
{'id': 1, 'name': 'Tom', 'dob': '1980-02-26', 'number_of_pets': 0},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function _index_table
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _index_table(tablename, metadata, engine, case_insensitive=False):
"""Index all columns on `tablename`, optionally using case-insensitive
indexes on string columns when supported by the database.
"""
table = sa.Table(tablename, metadata, autoload_with=engine)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function make_app
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def make_app():
app = sandman2.get_app(config.SQLA_URI, Base=utils.AutomapModel)
app.json_encoder = utils.APIJSONEncoder
app.config['CASE_INSENSITIVE'] = config.CASE_INSENSITIVE
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function apify
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def apify(filename, tablename=None):
try:
filenames = glob.glob(filename, recursive=True)
except TypeError: # recursive glob in Python 3.5+ only
filenames = glob.glob(filename)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function load_table
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def load_table(filename,
Function register_rules
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def register_rules(app, spec, service, schema, page_schema):
Function to_sql
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_sql(name, engine, frame, chunksize=None, **kwargs):
Function entrypoint
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def entrypoint(argv):
'''
This is a Docker entrypoint that configures the container to run
as the same uid of the user on the host container, rather than
the Docker default of root. Aside from following security best
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function get_message
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_message(payload):
if payload['Type'] == 'Notification':
keys = NOTIFICATION_KEYS
elif payload['Type'] in ['SubscriptionConfirmation',
'UnsubscribeConfirmation']:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function handle_notification
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_notification(self, data):
client = boto3.client('s3')
message = json.loads(data['Message'])
for record in message.get('Records', []):
bucket = record['s3']['bucket']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"