3scale/porta

View on GitHub
app/helpers/menu_helper.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
2 hrs
Test Coverage

MenuHelper#context_selector_props has approx 8 statements
Wontfix

  def context_selector_props
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/menu_helper.rb by reek

A method with Too Many Statements is any method that has a large number of lines.

Too Many Statements warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if, else, case, when, for, while, until, begin, rescue) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.

So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:

def parse(arg, argv, &error)
  if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
    return nil, block, nil                                         # +1
  end
  opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1]                          # +2
  val = conv_arg(*val)                                             # +3
  if opt and !arg
    argv.shift                                                     # +4
  else
    val[0] = nil                                                   # +5
  end
  val                                                              # +6
end

(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)

MenuHelper#link_to_switch_or_upgrade has 4 parameters
Open

  def link_to_switch_or_upgrade(name, options, path, switch)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/menu_helper.rb by reek

A Long Parameter List occurs when a method has a lot of parameters.

Example

Given

class Dummy
  def long_list(foo,bar,baz,fling,flung)
    puts foo,bar,baz,fling,flung
  end
end

Reek would report the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [2]:Dummy#long_list has 5 parameters (LongParameterList)

A common solution to this problem would be the introduction of parameter objects.

MenuHelper#menu_link has 5 parameters
Open

  def menu_link(level, title, path, options = {}, li_options = {}, &block)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/menu_helper.rb by reek

A Long Parameter List occurs when a method has a lot of parameters.

Example

Given

class Dummy
  def long_list(foo,bar,baz,fling,flung)
    puts foo,bar,baz,fling,flung
  end
end

Reek would report the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [2]:Dummy#long_list has 5 parameters (LongParameterList)

A common solution to this problem would be the introduction of parameter objects.

MenuHelper#main_menu_item has 4 parameters
Open

  def main_menu_item(id, label, path, options = {})
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/menu_helper.rb by reek

A Long Parameter List occurs when a method has a lot of parameters.

Example

Given

class Dummy
  def long_list(foo,bar,baz,fling,flung)
    puts foo,bar,baz,fling,flung
  end
end

Reek would report the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [2]:Dummy#long_list has 5 parameters (LongParameterList)

A common solution to this problem would be the introduction of parameter objects.

Method menu_link has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def menu_link(level, title, path, options = {}, li_options = {}, &block)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/menu_helper.rb - About 45 mins to fix

    Method link_to_switch_or_upgrade has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def link_to_switch_or_upgrade(name, options, path, switch)
        return if forcibly_denied_switch?(switch)
    
        if can?(:admin, switch)
          upgrade = options.delete(:upgrade_notice)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/helpers/menu_helper.rb - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method menu_link has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def menu_link(level, title, path, options = {}, li_options = {}, &block)
        current_title = options.delete(:title) || title
        if active_menu?(level, current_title) || current_page?(path)
          li_options[:class] = :active
        end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/helpers/menu_helper.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    MenuHelper#link_to_switch_or_upgrade calls 'options[:class]' 2 times
    Open

            options[:class].gsub!(/(?: fancybox |^fancybox$)/, ' ') if options[:class]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/helpers/menu_helper.rb by reek

    Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

    Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

    Example

    Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

    def double_thing()
      @other.thing + @other.thing
    end

    One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

    def double_thing()
      thing = @other.thing
      thing + thing
    end

    A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

    class Other
      def double_thing()
        thing + thing
      end
    end

    The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

    MenuHelper#main_menu_item manually dispatches method call
    Open

        fake_active = respond_to?(:active_upgrade_notice) && (id == active_upgrade_notice)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/helpers/menu_helper.rb by reek

    Reek reports a Manual Dispatch smell if it finds source code that manually checks whether an object responds to a method before that method is called. Manual dispatch is a type of Simulated Polymorphism which leads to code that is harder to reason about, debug, and refactor.

    Example

    class MyManualDispatcher
      attr_reader :foo
    
      def initialize(foo)
        @foo = foo
      end
    
      def call
        foo.bar if foo.respond_to?(:bar)
      end
    end

    Reek would emit the following warning:

    test.rb -- 1 warning:
      [9]: MyManualDispatcher manually dispatches method call (ManualDispatch)

    MenuHelper takes parameters ['label', 'options', 'path'] to 3 methods
    Open

      def main_menu_item(id, label, path, options = {})
        fake_active = respond_to?(:active_upgrade_notice) && (id == active_upgrade_notice)
        options[:active] = (id == active_menu) || fake_active
        menu_item(label, path, options)
      end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/helpers/menu_helper.rb by reek

    In general, a Data Clump occurs when the same two or three items frequently appear together in classes and parameter lists, or when a group of instance variable names start or end with similar substrings.

    The recurrence of the items often means there is duplicate code spread around to handle them. There may be an abstraction missing from the code, making the system harder to understand.

    Example

    Given

    class Dummy
      def x(y1,y2); end
      def y(y1,y2); end
      def z(y1,y2); end
    end

    Reek would emit the following warning:

    test.rb -- 1 warning:
      [2, 3, 4]:Dummy takes parameters [y1, y2] to 3 methods (DataClump)

    A possible way to fix this problem (quoting from Martin Fowler):

    The first step is to replace data clumps with objects and use the objects whenever you see them. An immediate benefit is that you'll shrink some parameter lists. The interesting stuff happens as you begin to look for behavior to move into the new objects.

    MenuHelper takes parameters ['options', 'path'] to 6 methods
    Open

      def main_menu_item(id, label, path, options = {})
        fake_active = respond_to?(:active_upgrade_notice) && (id == active_upgrade_notice)
        options[:active] = (id == active_menu) || fake_active
        menu_item(label, path, options)
      end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/helpers/menu_helper.rb by reek

    In general, a Data Clump occurs when the same two or three items frequently appear together in classes and parameter lists, or when a group of instance variable names start or end with similar substrings.

    The recurrence of the items often means there is duplicate code spread around to handle them. There may be an abstraction missing from the code, making the system harder to understand.

    Example

    Given

    class Dummy
      def x(y1,y2); end
      def y(y1,y2); end
      def z(y1,y2); end
    end

    Reek would emit the following warning:

    test.rb -- 1 warning:
      [2, 3, 4]:Dummy takes parameters [y1, y2] to 3 methods (DataClump)

    A possible way to fix this problem (quoting from Martin Fowler):

    The first step is to replace data clumps with objects and use the objects whenever you see them. An immediate benefit is that you'll shrink some parameter lists. The interesting stuff happens as you begin to look for behavior to move into the new objects.

    MenuHelper takes parameters ['name', 'options'] to 3 methods
    Open

      def switch_link(name, path, options = {})
        if switch = options.delete(:switch)
          link_to_switch_or_upgrade(name, options, path, switch)
        else
          link_to(name, path, options)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/helpers/menu_helper.rb by reek

    In general, a Data Clump occurs when the same two or three items frequently appear together in classes and parameter lists, or when a group of instance variable names start or end with similar substrings.

    The recurrence of the items often means there is duplicate code spread around to handle them. There may be an abstraction missing from the code, making the system harder to understand.

    Example

    Given

    class Dummy
      def x(y1,y2); end
      def y(y1,y2); end
      def z(y1,y2); end
    end

    Reek would emit the following warning:

    test.rb -- 1 warning:
      [2, 3, 4]:Dummy takes parameters [y1, y2] to 3 methods (DataClump)

    A possible way to fix this problem (quoting from Martin Fowler):

    The first step is to replace data clumps with objects and use the objects whenever you see them. An immediate benefit is that you'll shrink some parameter lists. The interesting stuff happens as you begin to look for behavior to move into the new objects.

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status