3scale/porta

View on GitHub
app/lib/pdf/finance/invoice_report_data.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
2 hrs
Test Coverage

Class InvoiceReportData has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

class Pdf::Finance::InvoiceReportData

  LINE_ITEMS_HEADING = %w[Name Quantity Cost Charged].freeze
  DATE_FORMAT = "%e %B, %Y"
  LOGO_ATTACHMENT_STYLE = :invoice
Severity: Minor
Found in app/lib/pdf/finance/invoice_report_data.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Pdf::Finance::InvoiceReportData#person_data has 4 parameters
    Open

      def person_data(address, fiscal_code, vat_code, po_number)

    A Long Parameter List occurs when a method has a lot of parameters.

    Example

    Given

    class Dummy
      def long_list(foo,bar,baz,fling,flung)
        puts foo,bar,baz,fling,flung
      end
    end

    Reek would report the following warning:

    test.rb -- 1 warning:
      [2]:Dummy#long_list has 5 parameters (LongParameterList)

    A common solution to this problem would be the introduction of parameter objects.

    Pdf::Finance::InvoiceReportData has at least 23 methods
    Open

    class Pdf::Finance::InvoiceReportData

    Too Many Methods is a special case of LargeClass.

    Example

    Given this configuration

    TooManyMethods:
      max_methods: 3

    and this code:

    class TooManyMethods
      def one; end
      def two; end
      def three; end
      def four; end
    end

    Reek would emit the following warning:

    test.rb -- 1 warning:
      [1]:TooManyMethods has at least 4 methods (TooManyMethods)

    Pdf::Finance::InvoiceReportData#line_items refers to 'item' more than self (maybe move it to another class?)
    Open

          [item.name || "", item.quantity || '', item.cost.round(LineItem::DECIMALS), '']

    Feature Envy occurs when a code fragment references another object more often than it references itself, or when several clients do the same series of manipulations on a particular type of object.

    Feature Envy reduces the code's ability to communicate intent: code that "belongs" on one class but which is located in another can be hard to find, and may upset the "System of Names" in the host class.

    Feature Envy also affects the design's flexibility: A code fragment that is in the wrong class creates couplings that may not be natural within the application's domain, and creates a loss of cohesion in the unwilling host class.

    Feature Envy often arises because it must manipulate other objects (usually its arguments) to get them into a useful form, and one force preventing them (the arguments) doing this themselves is that the common knowledge lives outside the arguments, or the arguments are of too basic a type to justify extending that type. Therefore there must be something which 'knows' about the contents or purposes of the arguments. That thing would have to be more than just a basic type, because the basic types are either containers which don't know about their contents, or they are single objects which can't capture their relationship with their fellows of the same type. So, this thing with the extra knowledge should be reified into a class, and the utility method will most likely belong there.

    Example

    Running Reek on:

    class Warehouse
      def sale_price(item)
        (item.price - item.rebate) * @vat
      end
    end

    would report:

    Warehouse#total_price refers to item more than self (FeatureEnvy)

    since this:

    (item.price - item.rebate)

    belongs to the Item class, not the Warehouse.

    Pdf::Finance::InvoiceReportData#person_data refers to 'pd' more than self (maybe move it to another class?)
    Open

        pd << ['Fiscal code', fiscal_code] if fiscal_code.present?
        pd << [@invoice.buyer_account.field_label('vat_code'), vat_code] if vat_code.present?
        pd << ['PO num', po_number] if po_number.present?

    Feature Envy occurs when a code fragment references another object more often than it references itself, or when several clients do the same series of manipulations on a particular type of object.

    Feature Envy reduces the code's ability to communicate intent: code that "belongs" on one class but which is located in another can be hard to find, and may upset the "System of Names" in the host class.

    Feature Envy also affects the design's flexibility: A code fragment that is in the wrong class creates couplings that may not be natural within the application's domain, and creates a loss of cohesion in the unwilling host class.

    Feature Envy often arises because it must manipulate other objects (usually its arguments) to get them into a useful form, and one force preventing them (the arguments) doing this themselves is that the common knowledge lives outside the arguments, or the arguments are of too basic a type to justify extending that type. Therefore there must be something which 'knows' about the contents or purposes of the arguments. That thing would have to be more than just a basic type, because the basic types are either containers which don't know about their contents, or they are single objects which can't capture their relationship with their fellows of the same type. So, this thing with the extra knowledge should be reified into a class, and the utility method will most likely belong there.

    Example

    Running Reek on:

    class Warehouse
      def sale_price(item)
        (item.price - item.rebate) * @vat
      end
    end

    would report:

    Warehouse#total_price refers to item more than self (FeatureEnvy)

    since this:

    (item.price - item.rebate)

    belongs to the Item class, not the Warehouse.

    Pdf::Finance::InvoiceReportData#total_invoice_label calls '@invoice.vat_rate' 2 times
    Open

        if @invoice.vat_rate.nil?
          total = ['Total cost', '', @invoice.exact_cost_without_vat, @invoice.charge_cost]
          [total]
        else
          vat_rate_label = @invoice.buyer_account.field_label('vat_rate')

    Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

    Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

    Example

    Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

    def double_thing()
      @other.thing + @other.thing
    end

    One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

    def double_thing()
      thing = @other.thing
      thing + thing
    end

    A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

    class Other
      def double_thing()
        thing + thing
      end
    end

    The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

    Pdf::Finance::InvoiceReportData#provider calls '@invoice.provider' 2 times
    Open

        person_data(@invoice.from, @invoice.provider.fiscal_code, @invoice.provider.vat_code, nil)

    Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

    Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

    Example

    Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

    def double_thing()
      @other.thing + @other.thing
    end

    One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

    def double_thing()
      thing = @other.thing
      thing + thing
    end

    A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

    class Other
      def double_thing()
        thing + thing
      end
    end

    The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

    Pdf::Finance::InvoiceReportData#total_invoice_label calls '@invoice.exact_cost_without_vat' 2 times
    Open

          total = ['Total cost', '', @invoice.exact_cost_without_vat, @invoice.charge_cost]
          [total]
        else
          vat_rate_label = @invoice.buyer_account.field_label('vat_rate')
    
    

    Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

    Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

    Example

    Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

    def double_thing()
      @other.thing + @other.thing
    end

    One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

    def double_thing()
      thing = @other.thing
      thing + thing
    end

    A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

    class Other
      def double_thing()
        thing + thing
      end
    end

    The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

    Pdf::Finance::InvoiceReportData#total_invoice_label calls '@invoice.charge_cost' 2 times
    Open

          total = ['Total cost', '', @invoice.exact_cost_without_vat, @invoice.charge_cost]
          [total]
        else
          vat_rate_label = @invoice.buyer_account.field_label('vat_rate')
    
    

    Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

    Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

    Example

    Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

    def double_thing()
      @other.thing + @other.thing
    end

    One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

    def double_thing()
      thing = @other.thing
      thing + thing
    end

    A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

    class Other
      def double_thing()
        thing + thing
      end
    end

    The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

    Pdf::Finance::InvoiceReportData#total_invoice_label performs a nil-check
    Open

        if @invoice.vat_rate.nil?

    A NilCheck is a type check. Failures of NilCheck violate the "tell, don't ask" principle.

    Additionally, type checks often mask bigger problems in your source code like not using OOP and / or polymorphism when you should.

    Example

    Given

    class Klass
      def nil_checker(argument)
        if argument.nil?
          puts "argument isn't nil!"
        end
      end
    end

    Reek would emit the following warning:

    test.rb -- 1 warning:
      [3]:Klass#nil_checker performs a nil-check. (NilCheck)

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status