3scale/porta

View on GitHub
app/lib/stats/key_helpers.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
55 mins
Test Coverage

Method key_for has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def key_for(*args)
      if args.size > 1
        key_for(args)
      else
        case object = args.first
Severity: Minor
Found in app/lib/stats/key_helpers.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Stats::KeyHelpers#key_for has approx 9 statements
Open

    def key_for(*args)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/lib/stats/key_helpers.rb by reek

A method with Too Many Statements is any method that has a large number of lines.

Too Many Statements warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if, else, case, when, for, while, until, begin, rescue) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.

So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:

def parse(arg, argv, &error)
  if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
    return nil, block, nil                                         # +1
  end
  opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1]                          # +2
  val = conv_arg(*val)                                             # +3
  if opt and !arg
    argv.shift                                                     # +4
  else
    val[0] = nil                                                   # +5
  end
  val                                                              # +6
end

(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)

Stats::KeyHelpers#key_for calls 'object.map' 2 times
Open

          object.map { |key, value| encode_pair(key, value) }.join('/')
        when Array
          object.map { |part| key_for(part) }.join('/')
Severity: Minor
Found in app/lib/stats/key_helpers.rb by reek

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

Stats::KeyHelpers#decode_key doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?)
Open

    def decode_key(key)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/lib/stats/key_helpers.rb by reek

A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.

Stats::KeyHelpers#encode_key doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?)
Open

    def encode_key(key)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/lib/stats/key_helpers.rb by reek

A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status