3scale/porta

View on GitHub
app/lib/stats/views/csv/metrics.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
0 mins
Test Coverage

Stats::Views::Csv::Metrics#collection calls '@data[:metric]' 2 times
Open

            [Metric.new(@data[:metric][:system_name], @data[:metric][:name], @data[:values])]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/lib/stats/views/csv/metrics.rb by reek

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

Stats::Views::Csv::Metrics#collection calls '@data[:metrics]' 2 times
Open

          unless @data[:metrics].nil?
            @data[:metrics].collect do |m|
Severity: Minor
Found in app/lib/stats/views/csv/metrics.rb by reek

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

Stats::Views::Csv::Metrics#collection performs a nil-check
Open

          unless @data[:metrics].nil?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/lib/stats/views/csv/metrics.rb by reek

A NilCheck is a type check. Failures of NilCheck violate the "tell, don't ask" principle.

Additionally, type checks often mask bigger problems in your source code like not using OOP and / or polymorphism when you should.

Example

Given

class Klass
  def nil_checker(argument)
    if argument.nil?
      puts "argument isn't nil!"
    end
  end
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [3]:Klass#nil_checker performs a nil-check. (NilCheck)

Stats::Views::Csv::Metrics#collection has the variable name 'm'
Open

            @data[:metrics].collect do |m|
Severity: Minor
Found in app/lib/stats/views/csv/metrics.rb by reek

An Uncommunicative Variable Name is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.

Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status