3scale/porta

View on GitHub
app/models/account/billing_address.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
0 mins
Test Coverage

Account::BillingAddress#copy_errors_to_billing_address contains iterators nested 2 deep
Open

      errors["billing_address_#{field}"].each do | error |
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

A Nested Iterator occurs when a block contains another block.

Example

Given

class Duck
  class << self
    def duck_names
      %i!tick trick track!.each do |surname|
        %i!duck!.each do |last_name|
          puts "full name is #{surname} #{last_name}"
        end
      end
    end
  end
end

Reek would report the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [5]:Duck#duck_names contains iterators nested 2 deep (NestedIterators)

Account::BillingAddress::Address#to_xml refers to 'xml' more than self (maybe move it to another class?)
Open

      xml.__send__(options.fetch(:root, :billing_address)) do |xml|
        to_hash.each do |attr, value|
          xml.__send__(attr, value)
        end
      end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

Feature Envy occurs when a code fragment references another object more often than it references itself, or when several clients do the same series of manipulations on a particular type of object.

Feature Envy reduces the code's ability to communicate intent: code that "belongs" on one class but which is located in another can be hard to find, and may upset the "System of Names" in the host class.

Feature Envy also affects the design's flexibility: A code fragment that is in the wrong class creates couplings that may not be natural within the application's domain, and creates a loss of cohesion in the unwilling host class.

Feature Envy often arises because it must manipulate other objects (usually its arguments) to get them into a useful form, and one force preventing them (the arguments) doing this themselves is that the common knowledge lives outside the arguments, or the arguments are of too basic a type to justify extending that type. Therefore there must be something which 'knows' about the contents or purposes of the arguments. That thing would have to be more than just a basic type, because the basic types are either containers which don't know about their contents, or they are single objects which can't capture their relationship with their fellows of the same type. So, this thing with the extra knowledge should be reified into a class, and the utility method will most likely belong there.

Example

Running Reek on:

class Warehouse
  def sale_price(item)
    (item.price - item.rebate) * @vat
  end
end

would report:

Warehouse#total_price refers to item more than self (FeatureEnvy)

since this:

(item.price - item.rebate)

belongs to the Item class, not the Warehouse.

Account::BillingAddress::Address#to_xml contains iterators nested 2 deep
Open

        to_hash.each do |attr, value|
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

A Nested Iterator occurs when a block contains another block.

Example

Given

class Duck
  class << self
    def duck_names
      %i!tick trick track!.each do |surname|
        %i!duck!.each do |last_name|
          puts "full name is #{surname} #{last_name}"
        end
      end
    end
  end
end

Reek would report the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [5]:Duck#duck_names contains iterators nested 2 deep (NestedIterators)

Account::BillingAddress#billing_address= manually dispatches method call
Open

    raise Account::BillingAddress::AddressFormatError, self unless address.respond_to?(:each)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

Reek reports a Manual Dispatch smell if it finds source code that manually checks whether an object responds to a method before that method is called. Manual dispatch is a type of Simulated Polymorphism which leads to code that is harder to reason about, debug, and refactor.

Example

class MyManualDispatcher
  attr_reader :foo

  def initialize(foo)
    @foo = foo
  end

  def call
    foo.bar if foo.respond_to?(:bar)
  end
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [9]: MyManualDispatcher manually dispatches method call (ManualDispatch)

Account::BillingAddress::Address#state is a writable attribute
Open

    attr_accessor :name, :address1, :address2, :city, :country, :state, :zip, :phone, :errors
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

A class that publishes a setter for an instance variable invites client classes to become too intimate with its inner workings, and in particular with its representation of state.

The same holds to a lesser extent for getters, but Reek doesn't flag those.

Example

Given:

class Klass
  attr_accessor :dummy
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

reek test.rb

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [2]:Klass declares the writable attribute dummy (Attribute)

Account::BillingAddress::Address#zip is a writable attribute
Open

    attr_accessor :name, :address1, :address2, :city, :country, :state, :zip, :phone, :errors
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

A class that publishes a setter for an instance variable invites client classes to become too intimate with its inner workings, and in particular with its representation of state.

The same holds to a lesser extent for getters, but Reek doesn't flag those.

Example

Given:

class Klass
  attr_accessor :dummy
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

reek test.rb

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [2]:Klass declares the writable attribute dummy (Attribute)

Account::BillingAddress#billing_address? performs a nil-check
Open

    !@billing_address_set.nil?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

A NilCheck is a type check. Failures of NilCheck violate the "tell, don't ask" principle.

Additionally, type checks often mask bigger problems in your source code like not using OOP and / or polymorphism when you should.

Example

Given

class Klass
  def nil_checker(argument)
    if argument.nil?
      puts "argument isn't nil!"
    end
  end
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [3]:Klass#nil_checker performs a nil-check. (NilCheck)

Account::BillingAddress::Address#name is a writable attribute
Open

    attr_accessor :name, :address1, :address2, :city, :country, :state, :zip, :phone, :errors
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

A class that publishes a setter for an instance variable invites client classes to become too intimate with its inner workings, and in particular with its representation of state.

The same holds to a lesser extent for getters, but Reek doesn't flag those.

Example

Given:

class Klass
  attr_accessor :dummy
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

reek test.rb

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [2]:Klass declares the writable attribute dummy (Attribute)

Account::BillingAddress::Address#address1 is a writable attribute
Open

    attr_accessor :name, :address1, :address2, :city, :country, :state, :zip, :phone, :errors
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

A class that publishes a setter for an instance variable invites client classes to become too intimate with its inner workings, and in particular with its representation of state.

The same holds to a lesser extent for getters, but Reek doesn't flag those.

Example

Given:

class Klass
  attr_accessor :dummy
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

reek test.rb

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [2]:Klass declares the writable attribute dummy (Attribute)

Account::BillingAddress::Address#address2 is a writable attribute
Open

    attr_accessor :name, :address1, :address2, :city, :country, :state, :zip, :phone, :errors
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

A class that publishes a setter for an instance variable invites client classes to become too intimate with its inner workings, and in particular with its representation of state.

The same holds to a lesser extent for getters, but Reek doesn't flag those.

Example

Given:

class Klass
  attr_accessor :dummy
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

reek test.rb

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [2]:Klass declares the writable attribute dummy (Attribute)

Account::BillingAddress::Address#phone is a writable attribute
Open

    attr_accessor :name, :address1, :address2, :city, :country, :state, :zip, :phone, :errors
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

A class that publishes a setter for an instance variable invites client classes to become too intimate with its inner workings, and in particular with its representation of state.

The same holds to a lesser extent for getters, but Reek doesn't flag those.

Example

Given:

class Klass
  attr_accessor :dummy
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

reek test.rb

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [2]:Klass declares the writable attribute dummy (Attribute)

Account::BillingAddress::Address#country is a writable attribute
Open

    attr_accessor :name, :address1, :address2, :city, :country, :state, :zip, :phone, :errors
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

A class that publishes a setter for an instance variable invites client classes to become too intimate with its inner workings, and in particular with its representation of state.

The same holds to a lesser extent for getters, but Reek doesn't flag those.

Example

Given:

class Klass
  attr_accessor :dummy
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

reek test.rb

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [2]:Klass declares the writable attribute dummy (Attribute)

Account::BillingAddress::Address#city is a writable attribute
Open

    attr_accessor :name, :address1, :address2, :city, :country, :state, :zip, :phone, :errors
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

A class that publishes a setter for an instance variable invites client classes to become too intimate with its inner workings, and in particular with its representation of state.

The same holds to a lesser extent for getters, but Reek doesn't flag those.

Example

Given:

class Klass
  attr_accessor :dummy
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

reek test.rb

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [2]:Klass declares the writable attribute dummy (Attribute)

Account::BillingAddress::Address#errors is a writable attribute
Open

    attr_accessor :name, :address1, :address2, :city, :country, :state, :zip, :phone, :errors
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

A class that publishes a setter for an instance variable invites client classes to become too intimate with its inner workings, and in particular with its representation of state.

The same holds to a lesser extent for getters, but Reek doesn't flag those.

Example

Given:

class Klass
  attr_accessor :dummy
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

reek test.rb

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [2]:Klass declares the writable attribute dummy (Attribute)

Account::BillingAddress#has_billing_address? performs a nil-check
Open

    !billing_address_name.nil?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/account/billing_address.rb by reek

A NilCheck is a type check. Failures of NilCheck violate the "tell, don't ask" principle.

Additionally, type checks often mask bigger problems in your source code like not using OOP and / or polymorphism when you should.

Example

Given

class Klass
  def nil_checker(argument)
    if argument.nil?
      puts "argument isn't nil!"
    end
  end
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [3]:Klass#nil_checker performs a nil-check. (NilCheck)

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status