3scale/porta

View on GitHub
app/models/policy.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
0 mins
Test Coverage

Mass assignment is not restricted using attr_accessible
Invalid

class Policy < ApplicationRecord
Severity: Critical
Found in app/models/policy.rb by brakeman

This warning comes up if a model does not limit what attributes can be set through mass assignment.

In particular, this check looks for attr_accessible inside model definitions. If it is not found, this warning will be issued.

Brakeman also warns on use of attr_protected - especially since it was found to be vulnerable to bypass. Warnings for mass assignment on models using attr_protected will be reported, but at a lower confidence level.

Note that disabling mass assignment globally will suppress these warnings.

Policy#directory= calls 'value.to_s' 2 times
Open

    self.name = File.dirname(value.to_s)
    self.version = File.basename(value.to_s)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/policy.rb by reek

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

Policy#validate_same_version calls 'version.to_s' 2 times
Open

    if version.to_s == BUILT_IN_NAME
      errors.add :version, :builtin
    elsif version.to_s != schema&.dig('version').to_s
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/policy.rb by reek

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

Policy#humanName has the name 'humanName'
Open

  def humanName
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/policy.rb by reek

An Uncommunicative Method Name is a method name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.

Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status