Method up has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.up
add_column :accounts, :tenant_id, :integer
add_column :alerts, :tenant_id, :integer
add_column :app_exhibits, :tenant_id, :integer
add_column :assets, :tenant_id, :integerMethod down has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.down
remove_column :accounts, :tenant_id
remove_column :alerts, :tenant_id
remove_column :app_exhibits, :tenant_id
remove_column :assets, :tenant_idAddTenantIdColumns#self.up has approx 39 statements Open
def self.up- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A method with Too Many Statements is any method that has a large number of lines.
Too Many Statements warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if, else, case, when, for, while, until, begin, rescue) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.
So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil # +1
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1] # +2
val = conv_arg(*val) # +3
if opt and !arg
argv.shift # +4
else
val[0] = nil # +5
end
val # +6
end(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)
AddTenantIdColumns#self.down has approx 39 statements Open
def self.down- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A method with Too Many Statements is any method that has a large number of lines.
Too Many Statements warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if, else, case, when, for, while, until, begin, rescue) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.
So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil # +1
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1] # +2
val = conv_arg(*val) # +3
if opt and !arg
argv.shift # +4
else
val[0] = nil # +5
end
val # +6
end(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)