3scale/porta

View on GitHub
db/migrate/20170718092220_change_cms_templates_column_to_blob.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
0 mins
Test Coverage

ChangeCMSTemplatesColumnToBlob#change has approx 9 statements
Open

  def change

A method with Too Many Statements is any method that has a large number of lines.

Too Many Statements warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if, else, case, when, for, while, until, begin, rescue) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.

So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:

def parse(arg, argv, &error)
  if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
    return nil, block, nil                                         # +1
  end
  opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1]                          # +2
  val = conv_arg(*val)                                             # +3
  if opt and !arg
    argv.shift                                                     # +4
  else
    val[0] = nil                                                   # +5
  end
  val                                                              # +6
end

(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)

ChangeCMSTemplatesColumnToBlob#change contains iterators nested 3 deep
Open

          [:draft, :published].each do |column_name|
            execute "ALTER TABLE %s MODIFY %s mediumtext CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_ci;" % [table_name, column_name]
          end
        end
      end

A Nested Iterator occurs when a block contains another block.

Example

Given

class Duck
  class << self
    def duck_names
      %i!tick trick track!.each do |surname|
        %i!duck!.each do |last_name|
          puts "full name is #{surname} #{last_name}"
        end
      end
    end
  end
end

Reek would report the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [5]:Duck#duck_names contains iterators nested 2 deep (NestedIterators)

ChangeCMSTemplatesColumnToBlob#change calls '[:cms_templates, :cms_templates_versions].each' 2 times
Open

        [:cms_templates, :cms_templates_versions].each do |table_name|
          [:draft, :published].each do |column_name|
            execute "ALTER TABLE %s MODIFY %s mediumtext CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_ci;" % [table_name, column_name]
          end
        end

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

ChangeCMSTemplatesColumnToBlob#change calls '[:draft, :published].each' 2 times
Open

          [:draft, :published].each do |column_name|
            execute "ALTER TABLE %s MODIFY %s mediumtext CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_ci;" % [table_name, column_name]
          end
        end
      end

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status