Sign upLogin

42wim/matterbridge

View on GitHub
Star
bridge/slack/handlers.go

Summary

Maintainability
A
1 hr
Test Coverage

Method Bslack.handleSlackClient has 57 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (b *Bslack) handleSlackClient(messages chan *config.Message) {
    for msg := range b.rtm.IncomingEvents {
        if msg.Type != sUserTyping && msg.Type != sHello && msg.Type != sLatencyReport {
            b.Log.Debugf("== Receiving event %#v", msg.Data)
        }
Severity: Minor
Found in bridge/slack/handlers.go - About 1 hr to fix

    Method Bslack.handleSlackClient has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    func (b *Bslack) handleSlackClient(messages chan *config.Message) {
    for msg := range b.rtm.IncomingEvents {
        if msg.Type != sUserTyping && msg.Type != sHello && msg.Type != sLatencyReport {
            b.Log.Debugf("== Receiving event %#v", msg.Data)
        }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bridge/slack/handlers.go - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status