Sign upLogin

42wim/matterbridge

View on GitHub
Star
bridge/telegram/handlers.go

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

Method Btelegram.handleUsername has a Cognitive Complexity of 41 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (b *Btelegram) handleUsername(rmsg *config.Message, message *tgbotapi.Message) {
    if message.From != nil {
        rmsg.UserID = strconv.FormatInt(message.From.ID, 10)
        if b.GetBool("UseFirstName") {
            rmsg.Username = message.From.FirstName
Severity: Minor
Found in bridge/telegram/handlers.go - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File handlers.go has 528 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

package btelegram

import (
    "fmt"
    "html"
Severity: Minor
Found in bridge/telegram/handlers.go - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method Btelegram.handleQuoting has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    func (b *Btelegram) handleQuoting(rmsg *config.Message, message *tgbotapi.Message) {
    // Used to check if the message was a reply to the root topic
    if message.ReplyToMessage != nil && (!message.IsTopicMessage || message.ReplyToMessage.MessageID != message.MessageThreadID) { //nolint:nestif
        usernameReply := ""
        if message.ReplyToMessage.From != nil {
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bridge/telegram/handlers.go - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method Btelegram.handleEntities has 52 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    func (b *Btelegram) handleEntities(rmsg *config.Message, message *tgbotapi.Message) {
    if message.Entities == nil {
        return
    }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bridge/telegram/handlers.go - About 1 hr to fix

      Method Btelegram.handleDownload has 51 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (b *Btelegram) handleDownload(rmsg *config.Message, message *tgbotapi.Message) error {
    size := int64(0)
    var url, name, text string
    switch {
    case message.Sticker != nil:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in bridge/telegram/handlers.go - About 1 hr to fix

        Method Btelegram.handleRecv has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        func (b *Btelegram) handleRecv(updates <-chan tgbotapi.Update) {
    for update := range updates {
        b.Log.Debugf("== Receiving event: %#v", update.Message)

        if update.Message == nil && update.ChannelPost == nil &&
        Severity: Minor
        Found in bridge/telegram/handlers.go - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method Btelegram.handleEntities has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        func (b *Btelegram) handleEntities(rmsg *config.Message, message *tgbotapi.Message) {
    if message.Entities == nil {
        return
    }
        Severity: Minor
        Found in bridge/telegram/handlers.go - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                if e.Type == "italic" {
            offset := e.Offset + indexMovedBy
            rmsg.Text = string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[:offset])) + "_" + string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[offset:offset+e.Length])) + "_" + string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[offset+e.Length:]))
            indexMovedBy += 2
        }
        Severity: Major
        Found in bridge/telegram/handlers.go and 4 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 618..622
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 624..628
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 630..634
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 640..644

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 123.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                if e.Type == "strike" {
            offset := e.Offset + indexMovedBy
            rmsg.Text = string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[:offset])) + "~" + string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[offset:offset+e.Length])) + "~" + string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[offset+e.Length:]))
            indexMovedBy += 2
        }
        Severity: Major
        Found in bridge/telegram/handlers.go and 4 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 618..622
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 624..628
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 630..634
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 635..639

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 123.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                if e.Type == "code" {
            offset := e.Offset + indexMovedBy
            rmsg.Text = string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[:offset])) + "`" + string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[offset:offset+e.Length])) + "`" + string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[offset+e.Length:]))
            indexMovedBy += 2
        }
        Severity: Major
        Found in bridge/telegram/handlers.go and 4 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 624..628
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 630..634
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 635..639
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 640..644

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 123.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                if e.Type == "pre" {
            offset := e.Offset + indexMovedBy
            rmsg.Text = string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[:offset])) + "```\n" + string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[offset:offset+e.Length])) + "```\n" + string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[offset+e.Length:]))
            indexMovedBy += 8
        }
        Severity: Major
        Found in bridge/telegram/handlers.go and 4 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 618..622
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 630..634
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 635..639
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 640..644

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 123.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                if e.Type == "bold" {
            offset := e.Offset + indexMovedBy
            rmsg.Text = string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[:offset])) + "*" + string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[offset:offset+e.Length])) + "*" + string(utf16.Decode(asRunes[offset+e.Length:]))
            indexMovedBy += 2
        }
        Severity: Major
        Found in bridge/telegram/handlers.go and 4 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 618..622
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 624..628
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 635..639
        bridge/telegram/handlers.go on lines 640..644

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 123.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        There are no issues that match your filters.

        Category
        Status