Showing 47 of 74 total issues
Function HandleDownloadSize
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func HandleDownloadSize(logger *logrus.Entry, msg *config.Message, name string, size int64, general *config.Protocol) error {
Function HandleDownloadData2
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func HandleDownloadData2(logger *logrus.Entry, msg *config.Message, name, id, comment, url string, data *[]byte, general *config.Protocol) {
Method Bslack.handleSlackClient
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (b *Bslack) handleSlackClient(messages chan *config.Message) {
for msg := range b.rtm.IncomingEvents {
if msg.Type != sUserTyping && msg.Type != sHello && msg.Type != sLatencyReport {
b.Log.Debugf("== Receiving event %#v", msg.Data)
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Bmatrix.handleEvent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (b *Bmatrix) handleEvent(ev *matrix.Event) {
b.Log.Debugf("== Receiving event: %#v", ev)
if ev.Sender != b.UserID {
b.RLock()
channel, ok := b.RoomMap[ev.RoomID]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Btelegram.handleRecv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (b *Btelegram) handleRecv(updates <-chan tgbotapi.Update) {
for update := range updates {
b.Log.Debugf("== Receiving event: %#v", update.Message)
if update.Message == nil && update.ChannelPost == nil &&
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Btelegram.handleEntities
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (b *Btelegram) handleEntities(rmsg *config.Message, message *tgbotapi.Message) {
if message.Entities == nil {
return
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Bxmpp.Send
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (b *Bxmpp) Send(msg config.Message) (string, error) {
// should be fixed by using a cache instead of dropping
if !b.Connected() {
return "", fmt.Errorf("bridge %s not connected, dropping message %#v to bridge", b.Account, msg)
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"