Showing 9 of 11 total issues
File article.go
has 550 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
package dao
import (
"JuneGoBlog/src"
"JuneGoBlog/src/consts"
Function queryArticleInfoFromCache
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
func queryArticleInfoFromCache(id int) (ArticleListInfo, error) {
var fields = []string{
"Title", "Abstract", "ID", "CreateTime", "Tags",
}
result := ArticleListInfo{}
Function Load
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
func Load(iniPath, block string, s interface{}) {
// 1. 读取ini文件
_, currentfile, _, _ := runtime.Caller(1) // 忽略错误
filename := path.Join(path.Dir(currentfile), iniPath)
lines := ReadLines(filename)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function queryArticleInfoFromCache
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
func queryArticleInfoFromCache(id int) (ArticleListInfo, error) {
var fields = []string{
"Title", "Abstract", "ID", "CreateTime", "Tags",
}
result := ArticleListInfo{}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Load
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
func Load(iniPath, block string, s interface{}) {
// 1. 读取ini文件
_, currentfile, _, _ := runtime.Caller(1) // 忽略错误
filename := path.Join(path.Dir(currentfile), iniPath)
lines := ReadLines(filename)
Function queryTagByIDFromCache
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
Open
func queryTagByIDFromCache(id int) (*Tag, error) {
rc := juneDao.GetRedisConn()
defer rc.Close()
tagInfoCacheFields := []string{
"ID", "Name", "CreateTime",
Function AddArticle
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
Open
func AddArticle(newArticle *Article, tagIDs []int) (*Article, error) {
tx := juneDao.GetDB().Begin()
var err error
defer func() {
if err != nil {
Function QueryArticleInfoByLimit
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
Open
func QueryArticleInfoByLimit(page, pageSize int) ([]ArticleListInfo, int, error) {
total, err := QueryArticleTotal()
if err != nil {
return nil, 0, err
}
Function queryArticleIDListFromCache
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
Open
func queryArticleIDListFromCache(page, pageSize, total int) ([]int, error) {
start := (page-1)*pageSize + 1
r := make([]int, 0)
rc := juneDao.GetRedisConn()
defer rc.Close()