ANSSI-FR/polichombr

View on GitHub

Showing 1,243 of 1,244 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

class PEImport(db.Model):
    __tablename__ = 'peimport'
    id = db.Column(db.Integer(), primary_key=True)
    module_name = db.Column(db.String(), index=True)
    function_name = db.Column(db.String())
Severity: Major
Found in polichombr/models/analysis.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
polichombr/models/analysis.py on lines 78..82

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method find_start_of_function has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.find_start_of_function(address)
    blocks = []
    di = $gdasm.di_at(address)
    return nil unless defined?(di.instruction)
    return nil unless defined?(di.block)
Severity: Minor
Found in polichombr/analysis_tools/AnalyzeIt.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Assignment Branch Condition size for printCallTree is too high. [27.86/15]
Open

def printCallTree(fromaddr, toaddr)
  @currenttree_done = []
  i = 0
  @glinestree = 9999
  log('')

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

@apiview.route('/samples/<int:sid>/comments/', methods=['GET'])
@login_required
def api_get_sample_comments(sid):
    """
        Get all the comments for a given sample
Severity: Major
Found in polichombr/views/api_idaactions.py and 2 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
polichombr/views/api_idaactions.py on lines 119..131
polichombr/views/api_idaactions.py on lines 176..184

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 62.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

@apiview.route('/samples/<int:sid>/types/', methods=['GET'])
@login_required
def api_get_sample_types(sid):
    """
        Get the IDA types stored in DB
Severity: Major
Found in polichombr/views/api_idaactions.py and 2 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
polichombr/views/api_idaactions.py on lines 79..92
polichombr/views/api_idaactions.py on lines 119..131

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 62.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

@apiview.route('/samples/<int:sid>/names/', methods=['GET'])
@login_required
def api_get_sample_names(sid):
    """
        Get names for a given sample
Severity: Major
Found in polichombr/views/api_idaactions.py and 2 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
polichombr/views/api_idaactions.py on lines 79..92
polichombr/views/api_idaactions.py on lines 176..184

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 62.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Cyclomatic complexity for find_start_of_function is too high. [17/6]
Open

  def self.find_start_of_function(address)
    blocks = []
    di = $gdasm.di_at(address)
    return nil unless defined?(di.instruction)
    return nil unless defined?(di.block)

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Perceived complexity for find_start_of_function is too high. [18/7]
Open

  def self.find_start_of_function(address)
    blocks = []
    di = $gdasm.di_at(address)
    return nil unless defined?(di.instruction)
    return nil unless defined?(di.block)

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    for e in elements:
        et = e[13:-1]
        for i in Sample.query.get(sample_id).functions:
            if i.address == et:
                svg_data = svg_data.replace(e, i.name)
Severity: Major
Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
polichombr/controllers/sample.py on lines 962..966

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 61.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    for e in elements:
        et = e[4:-1]
        for i in Sample.query.get(sample_id).functions:
            if i.address == et:
                svg_data = svg_data.replace(e, i.name)
Severity: Major
Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
polichombr/controllers/sample.py on lines 956..960

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 61.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

File sample.py has 288 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

"""
    This file is part of Polichombr.

    (c) 2016 ANSSI-FR

Severity: Minor
Found in polichombr/models/sample.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    File api_idaactions.py has 285 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    """
        This file is part of Polichombr.
    
        (c) 2018 ANSSI-FR
    
    
    Severity: Minor
    Found in polichombr/views/api_idaactions.py - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method search_fulltext. (12)
      Open

          @classmethod
          def search_fulltext(cls, needle, max_results=50):
              """
                  Search a text in lot of items and return associated samples.
                  Searchs in filenames, strings, functions names and anlysis
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Method has too many lines. [19/10]
      Open

      def calculateSizeSubCallTree(fromaddr, toaddr, indent, cnt)
        return 0 if fromaddr == toaddr
        i = 0
        total = 1
        return total if indent.length > 5

      This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

      Assignment Branch Condition size for parse_some_string is too high. [23.35/15]
      Open

      def parse_some_string(addr, str, comment)
        basefunc = MetasmUtils.find_start_of_function(addr)
        basefunc = 0 if basefunc.nil?
        di = $gdasm.di_at(addr)
        if defined?(di.block) && defined?(di.block.list[0]) && defined?(di.block.list[0].address)

      This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

      Method has too many lines. [18/10]
      Open

        def self.murmur3_32_str_hash(str, seed = 0)
          h1 = seed
          numbers = str.unpack('V*C*')
          tailn = str.bytesize % 4
          tail = numbers.slice!(numbers.size - tailn, tailn)

      This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

      Assignment Branch Condition size for murmur3_32_str_hash is too high. [23.52/15]
      Open

        def self.murmur3_32_str_hash(str, seed = 0)
          h1 = seed
          numbers = str.unpack('V*C*')
          tailn = str.bytesize % 4
          tail = numbers.slice!(numbers.size - tailn, tailn)

      This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

      Function execute_task has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      def execute_task(mqueue, kill_event):
          """
          Simple worker wich will execute the tasks analyses. It ends on setting the
          analysis status as finished.
          """
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/jobpool.py - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Block has too many lines. [52/25]
      Open

      dasm.decoded.each do |_addr, di|
        if di.instruction.to_s =~ /^mov .*\[ebp-[0-9a-f]*h{0,1}\], [0-9a-f]*h{0,1}$/n
          movebpstack << di
        end
        if ((di.opcode.props[:setip] == true) || (di.opcode.props[:stopexec] == true)) && (movebpstack.length > 3)

      This cop checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function execute_task. (10)
      Open

      def execute_task(mqueue, kill_event):
          """
          Simple worker wich will execute the tasks analyses. It ends on setting the
          analysis status as finished.
          """
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/jobpool.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Severity
      Category
      Status
      Source
      Language