Sign upLogin

ANSSI-FR/polichombr

View on GitHub
Star
polichombr/controllers/sample.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
6 days
Test Coverage

File sample.py has 868 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

"""
    This file is part of Polichombr.

    (c) 2017 ANSSI-FR
Severity: Major
Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py - About 2 days to fix

    SampleController has 56 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    class SampleController(object):

    """
        Wrapper to the Sample model. It is in charge of managing the creation,
        extraction and modification of samples, and all of directly related
    Severity: Major
    Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py - About 1 day to fix

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method search_fulltext. (12)
      Open

          @classmethod
    def search_fulltext(cls, needle, max_results=50):
        """
            Search a text in lot of items and return associated samples.
            Searchs in filenames, strings, functions names and anlysis
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method create_sample_from_file. (9)
      Open

          def create_sample_from_file(self, file_data, orig_filename="", user=None,
                                tlp_level=TLPLevel.TLPWHITE):
        """
            Creates a sample from file data. Updates metadata, etc.
        """
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function disassemble_sample_get_svg. (9)
      Open

      def disassemble_sample_get_svg(sample_id, address):
    """
        Gets SVG file data, with functions names.
    """
    graph = disassemble_sample(sample_id, address)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method machoc_get_similar_functions. (9)
      Open

          @classmethod
    def machoc_get_similar_functions(cls, sample_dst, sample_src):
        """
            Diff two sample in order to identify similar functions.
            This is performed by:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method sample_rename_from_diff. (8)
      Open

          @classmethod
    def sample_rename_from_diff(cls, items, sample_dst, sample_src):
        """
            Rename a sample's functions with other ones functions.
        """
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method add_metadata. (7)
      Open

          @staticmethod
    def add_metadata(sample, metadata_type, metadata_value):
        """
            Add a sample's metadata.
        """
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method add_function. (7)
      Open

          @classmethod
    def add_function(cls, sample, address, machoc_hash,
                     name="", overwrite=False):
        """
            Add a function. Updates if exists.
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Function search_fulltext has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def search_fulltext(cls, needle, max_results=50):
        """
            Search a text in lot of items and return associated samples.
            Searchs in filenames, strings, functions names and anlysis
            abstracts. Oh, and also in samples abstracts.
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method machoc_diff_with_all_samples. (6)
      Open

          @classmethod
    def machoc_diff_with_all_samples(cls, sample, level=0.8):
        """
            Diff a sample with all other samples. Class method.
        """
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method search_machoc_full_hash. (6)
      Open

          def search_machoc_full_hash(self, machoc_hash, limit=0.8):
        """
            Search a full machoc hash.
            In one word, diffs with other samples in database.
        """
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method match_by_importhash. (6)
      Open

          @classmethod
    def match_by_importhash(cls, sample):
        """
            Match samples by import hash.
        """
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Function disassemble_sample_get_svg has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      def disassemble_sample_get_svg(sample_id, address):
    """
        Gets SVG file data, with functions names.
    """
    graph = disassemble_sample(sample_id, address)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function machoc_get_similar_functions has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def machoc_get_similar_functions(cls, sample_dst, sample_src):
        """
            Diff two sample in order to identify similar functions.
            This is performed by:
                - getting unique machoc hashes;
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function sample_rename_from_diff has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def sample_rename_from_diff(cls, items, sample_dst, sample_src):
        """
            Rename a sample's functions with other ones functions.
        """
        for fid_dst, fid_src in items:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function match_by_importhash has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def match_by_importhash(cls, sample):
        """
            Match samples by import hash.
        """
        if sample.import_hash is None or sample.import_hash == "":
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py - About 45 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function search_machoc_full_hash has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def search_machoc_full_hash(self, machoc_hash, limit=0.8):
        """
            Search a full machoc hash.
            In one word, diffs with other samples in database.
        """
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py - About 45 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function create_sample_from_file has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def create_sample_from_file(self, file_data, orig_filename="", user=None,
                                tlp_level=TLPLevel.TLPWHITE):
        """
            Creates a sample from file data. Updates metadata, etc.
        """
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py - About 45 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function add_metadata has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def add_metadata(sample, metadata_type, metadata_value):
        """
            Add a sample's metadata.
        """
        if SampleMetadataType.tostring(metadata_type) == "":
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py - About 45 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function add_function has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def add_function(cls, sample, address, machoc_hash,
      Severity: Minor
      Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py - About 35 mins to fix

        Function add_function has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def add_function(cls, sample, address, machoc_hash,
                     name="", overwrite=False):
        """
            Add a function. Updates if exists.
        """
        Severity: Minor
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function machoc_diff_with_all_samples has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def machoc_diff_with_all_samples(cls, sample, level=0.8):
        """
            Diff a sample with all other samples. Class method.
        """
        if sample.functions.count() == 0:
        Severity: Minor
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py - About 25 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function get_user_uncategorized_samples has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def get_user_uncategorized_samples(user, limit=15):
        """
            By user with no family.
        """
        samples = []
        Severity: Minor
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py - About 25 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        TODO found
        Open

                # TODO: apply_action()
        Severity: Minor
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by fixme

        TODO found
        Open

                # TODO: propagate to FUNCTIONINFO names
        Severity: Minor
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by fixme

        TODO found
        Open

                    TODO: use objects, not ids (cf. task_analyzeitrb).
        Severity: Minor
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by fixme

        XXX found
        Open

                # XXX fix this
        Severity: Minor
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by fixme

        TODO found
        Open

                TODO: move the beautifier code here, there is no reason to leave
        Severity: Minor
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by fixme

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            for e in elements:
        et = e[4:-1]
        for i in Sample.query.get(sample_id).functions:
            if i.address == et:
                svg_data = svg_data.replace(e, i.name)
        Severity: Major
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
        polichombr/controllers/sample.py on lines 956..960

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 61.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            for e in elements:
        et = e[13:-1]
        for i in Sample.query.get(sample_id).functions:
            if i.address == et:
                svg_data = svg_data.replace(e, i.name)
        Severity: Major
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
        polichombr/controllers/sample.py on lines 962..966

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 61.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            @staticmethod
    def add_user(user, sample):
        """
            Add user in sample.
        """
        Severity: Major
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
        polichombr/controllers/family.py on lines 144..153

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 50.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            @staticmethod
    def remove_user(user, sample):
        """
            Delete user from sample.
        """
        Severity: Major
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
        polichombr/controllers/family.py on lines 124..132
        polichombr/controllers/family.py on lines 134..142
        polichombr/controllers/yara_rule.py on lines 239..247

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 47.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                for meta in sample.s_metadata:
            if meta.type_id == metadata_type and meta.value == metadata_value:
                return True
        Severity: Minor
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
        polichombr/controllers/sample.py on lines 672..674

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 36.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                for string_item in sample.strings:
            if string_item.string_type == string_type and string_item.string_value == string_value:
                return True
        Severity: Minor
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
        polichombr/controllers/sample.py on lines 644..646

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 36.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            @staticmethod
    def delete_checklist(checklist):
        """
            Deletes checklist.
        """
        Severity: Major
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py and 2 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
        polichombr/controllers/family.py on lines 403..410
        polichombr/controllers/user.py on lines 152..159

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 34.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            @staticmethod
    def get_functions(sample_id):
        """
            Return all the functions for a sample
        """
        Severity: Minor
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
        polichombr/controllers/sample.py on lines 814..820

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 33.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            @staticmethod
    def get_functions_by_machoc_hash(needle):
        """
            Return a list of functions matching a given machoc hash
        """
        Severity: Minor
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
        polichombr/controllers/sample.py on lines 766..772

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 33.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Line too long (99 > 79 characters)
        Open

                    if string_item.string_type == string_type and string_item.string_value == string_value:
        Severity: Minor
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by pep8

        Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

        There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.

Reports error E501.

        Line too long (84 > 79 characters)
        Open

                    if fsrc not in sample_src.functions or fdst not in sample_dst.functions:
        Severity: Minor
        Found in polichombr/controllers/sample.py by pep8

        Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

        There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.

Reports error E501.

        There are no issues that match your filters.

        Category
        Status