lib/proposes_edits.rb
Line is too long. [92/90] (https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide#80-character-limits) Open
Open
user_can_edit_private_fields = usr.try(self.class.user_type_who_edits_non_public_fields)
- Exclude checks
Use the new Ruby 1.9 hash syntax. (https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide#hash-literals) Open
Open
update!(:accepted => true, :archived => true)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks hash literal syntax.
It can enforce either the use of the class hash rocket syntax or the use of the newer Ruby 1.9 syntax (when applicable).
A separate offense is registered for each problematic pair.
The supported styles are:
- ruby19 - forces use of the 1.9 syntax (e.g.
{a: 1}
) when hashes have all symbols for keys - hash_rockets - forces use of hash rockets for all hashes
- nomixedkeys - simply checks for hashes with mixed syntaxes
- ruby19nomixed_keys - forces use of ruby 1.9 syntax and forbids mixed syntax hashes
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19 (default)
# bad
{:a => 2}
{b: 1, :c => 2}
# good
{a: 2, b: 1}
{:c => 2, 'd' => 2} # acceptable since 'd' isn't a symbol
{d: 1, 'e' => 2} # technically not forbidden
Example: EnforcedStyle: hash_rockets
# bad
{a: 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 5}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: nomixedkeys
# bad
{:a => 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 2}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 1, d: 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19nomixed_keys
# bad
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 2, 'd' => 3} # should just use hash rockets
# good
{a: 1, b: 2}
{:c => 3, 'd' => 4}
Line is too long. [99/90] (https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide#80-character-limits) Open
Open
editable &= can_user_edit_this_field_if_private? self.class.publish_proc.call(field), opts[:by]
- Exclude checks
Use the new Ruby 1.9 hash syntax. (https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide#hash-literals) Open
Open
update!(:accepted => true, :archived => true)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks hash literal syntax.
It can enforce either the use of the class hash rocket syntax or the use of the newer Ruby 1.9 syntax (when applicable).
A separate offense is registered for each problematic pair.
The supported styles are:
- ruby19 - forces use of the 1.9 syntax (e.g.
{a: 1}
) when hashes have all symbols for keys - hash_rockets - forces use of hash rockets for all hashes
- nomixedkeys - simply checks for hashes with mixed syntaxes
- ruby19nomixed_keys - forces use of ruby 1.9 syntax and forbids mixed syntax hashes
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19 (default)
# bad
{:a => 2}
{b: 1, :c => 2}
# good
{a: 2, b: 1}
{:c => 2, 'd' => 2} # acceptable since 'd' isn't a symbol
{d: 1, 'e' => 2} # technically not forbidden
Example: EnforcedStyle: hash_rockets
# bad
{a: 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 5}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: nomixedkeys
# bad
{:a => 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 2}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 1, d: 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19nomixed_keys
# bad
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 2, 'd' => 3} # should just use hash rockets
# good
{a: 1, b: 2}
{:c => 3, 'd' => 4}
Rename has_proposed_edit?
to proposed_edit?
. (https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide#bool-methods-qmark) Open
Open
def has_proposed_edit? field
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop makes sure that predicates are named properly.
Example:
# bad
def is_even?(value)
end
# good
def even?(value)
end
# bad
def has_value?
end
# good
def value?
end