AlexWayfer/formalism-r18n_errors

View on GitHub
lib/formalism/r18n_errors/validation_helpers.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
3 hrs
Test Coverage

Method validate_range_entry has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

            def validate_range_entry(validation_field, range)
                return unless field_changed?(validation_field)

                value = public_send(validation_field).to_f

Severity: Minor
Found in lib/formalism/r18n_errors/validation_helpers.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method validate_provision has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

            def validate_provision(*validation_fields, error_key: :not_provided)
                valid = true
                validation_fields.flatten.each do |validation_field|
                    next unless field_changed?(validation_field)
                    next if field_valid?(validation_field)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/formalism/r18n_errors/validation_helpers.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method validate_uuid has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

            def validate_uuid(*validation_fields)
                valid = true
                validation_fields.flatten.each do |validation_field|
                    next unless field_changed?(validation_field)
                    next if /\A\h{8}-\h{4}-\h{4}-\h{4}-\h{12}\z/.match? public_send(validation_field)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/formalism/r18n_errors/validation_helpers.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method validate_email has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

            def validate_email(*validation_fields)
                valid = true
                validation_fields.flatten.each do |validation_field|
                    next unless field_changed?(validation_field)
                    next if EmailAddress.valid? public_send(validation_field)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/formalism/r18n_errors/validation_helpers.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method validate_uniqueness has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

            def validate_uniqueness(*fields_combinations)
                valid = true
                fields_combinations.each do |*fields_combination|
                    fields_combination.flatten!

Severity: Minor
Found in lib/formalism/r18n_errors/validation_helpers.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            def validate_max_length(validation_field, max_length)
                return unless field_changed?(validation_field)

                value = public_send(validation_field)
                return true if value && value.length <= max_length
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/formalism/r18n_errors/validation_helpers.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
lib/formalism/r18n_errors/validation_helpers.rb on lines 43..50

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            def validate_min_length(validation_field, min_length)
                return unless field_changed?(validation_field)

                value = public_send(validation_field)
                return true if value && value.length >= min_length
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/formalism/r18n_errors/validation_helpers.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
lib/formalism/r18n_errors/validation_helpers.rb on lines 33..40

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status