Showing 164 of 164 total issues
Function HBKeyboard
has 207 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(function HBKeyboard() {
var docCookies = { //from developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/document.cookie
getItem: function (sKey) {
return unescape(document.cookie.replace(new RegExp("(?:(?:^|.*;)\\s*" + escape(sKey).replace(/[\-\.\+\*]/g, "\\$&") + "\\s*\\=\\s*([^;]*).*$)|^.*$"), "$1")) || null;
},
File posts_controller.rb
has 445 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class PostsController < ApplicationController
before_action :authenticate_user!, except: [:document, :help_center, :show]
before_action :set_post, only: [:toggle_comments, :feature, :lock, :unlock]
before_action :set_scoped_post, only: [:change_category, :show, :edit, :update, :close, :reopen, :delete, :restore]
before_action :verify_moderator, only: [:toggle_comments]
Method update
has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update
before = { body: @post.body_markdown, title: @post.title, tags: @post.tags }
after_tags = if @post_type.has_category?
Tag.where(tag_set_id: @post.category.tag_set_id, name: params[:post][:tags_cache])
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File judaism.js
has 389 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
The MIT License (MIT)
Copyright (c) 2013 HodofHod (https://github.com/HodofHod, http://judaism.stackexchange.com/users/883/hodofhod)
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
Method qualifiers_to_sql
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def qualifiers_to_sql(qualifiers)
valid_value = {
date: /^[<>=]{0,2}\d+(?:s|m|h|d|w|mo|y)?$/,
numeric: /^[<>=]{0,2}\d+$/
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function createKeyboard
has 127 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function createKeyboard() {
var stand = "קראטוןםפשדגכעיחלךףזסבהנמצתץ",
alpha = "חזוהדגבאסןנםמלךכיטתשרקץצףפע",
nek = ["שׁ", "שׂ", "וְ", "וֱ", "וֲ", "וֳ", "וִ", "וֵ", "וֶ", "וַ", "וָ", "וֹ", "וֻ", "וּ"],
x = 50,
File users_controller.rb
has 346 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'net/http'
# rubocop:disable Metrics/ClassLength
class UsersController < ApplicationController
include Devise::Controllers::Rememberable
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (warnings.length > 0) {
const $warningBox = $(`<div class="notice is-warning"></div>`);
const $warningList = $(`<ul></ul>`);
warnings.forEach(w => {
$warningList.append(`<li>${w['message']}</li>`);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 118.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (errors.length > 0) {
const $errorBox = $(`<div class="notice is-danger"></div>`);
const $errorList = $(`<ul></ul>`);
errors.forEach(e => {
$errorList.append(`<li>${e['message']}</li>`);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 118.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File advertisement_controller.rb
has 327 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'rmagick'
require 'open-uri'
# Necessary due to rmagick
# rubocop:disable Metrics/MethodLength
Class Post
has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Post < ApplicationRecord
include CommunityRelated
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :post_type
Class PostsController
has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class PostsController < ApplicationController
before_action :authenticate_user!, except: [:document, :help_center, :show]
before_action :set_post, only: [:toggle_comments, :feature, :lock, :unlock]
before_action :set_scoped_post, only: [:change_category, :show, :edit, :update, :close, :reopen, :delete, :restore]
before_action :verify_moderator, only: [:toggle_comments]
Function homeMenu
has 78 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function homeMenu(e) {
if (e.key === "?") {
_CodidactKeyboard.dialog('Codidact Keyboard Shortcuts\n' +
'===========================\n' +
'? Open this help\n' +
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const resp = await fetch(`/users/${$tgt.attr('data-user')}/mod/privileges`, {
method: 'POST',
body: JSON.stringify({ do: 'delete', ability: $tgt.attr('data-ability') }),
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-CSRF-Token': QPixel.csrfToken() },
credentials: 'include'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const resp = await fetch(`/users/${$tgt.attr('data-user')}/mod/privileges`, {
method: 'POST',
body: JSON.stringify({ do: 'grant', ability: $tgt.attr('data-ability') }),
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-CSRF-Token': QPixel.csrfToken() },
credentials: 'include'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method do_rtl_witchcraft
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_rtl_witchcraft(str)
chars = str.chars
output_buffer = ''
scan_buffer = []
current_mode = rtl?(chars[0]) ? :rtl : :ltr
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
@post_type = PostType.find(params[:post][:post_type_id])
@parent = Post.where(id: params[:parent]).first
@category = if @post_type.has_category
if params[:post][:category_id].present?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File keyboard_tools.js
has 286 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$(() => {
const userLink = $('.header--item.is-complex.is-visible-on-mobile[href^="/users/"]').attr('href');
const keyboardToolsAreEnabled = !!window.localStorage.getItem("keyboard__enable");
$(".js-keyboard_tools-status").text(keyboardToolsAreEnabled ? "activated" : "inactive");
Method question_ad
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def question_ad(question)
ad = Rails.cache.fetch "posts/#{question.id}/ad", expires_in: 60.minutes do
ad = Image.new(600, 500)
ad.background_color = 'white'
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
@post = Post.find(params[:comment][:post_id])
if @post.comments_disabled && !current_user.is_moderator && !current_user.is_admin
render json: { status: 'failed', message: 'Comments have been disabled on this post.' }, status: :forbidden
return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"