Sign upLogin

AyuntamientoMadrid/participacion

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 1,085 of 1,085 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  describe "#user" do
    it "does not find users that are not public" do
      allow(User).to receive(:public_for_api).and_return(User.none)
      user = create(:user)
Severity: Major
Found in spec/graphql/types/query_type_spec.rb and 4 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
spec/graphql/types/query_type_spec.rb on lines 263..271
spec/graphql/types/query_type_spec.rb on lines 299..307
spec/graphql/types/query_type_spec.rb on lines 321..329
spec/graphql/types/query_type_spec.rb on lines 368..376

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    it "is not shown when the assigned investments aren't visible to valuators" do
      budget = create(:budget, :valuating)
      create(:budget_investment, :invisible_to_valuators, budget: budget, valuators: [valuator])

      render_inline Valuation::Budgets::RowComponent.new(budget: budget)
Severity: Minor
Found in spec/components/valuation/budgets/row_component_spec.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
spec/components/valuation/budgets/row_component_spec.rb on lines 62..68
spec/components/valuation/budgets/row_component_spec.rb on lines 111..117
spec/components/valuation/budgets/row_component_spec.rb on lines 120..126

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    it "is not shown when the budget hasn't reached the valuating phase" do
      budget = create(:budget, :accepting)
      create(:budget_investment, :visible_to_valuators, budget: budget, valuators: [valuator])

      render_inline Valuation::Budgets::RowComponent.new(budget: budget)
Severity: Minor
Found in spec/components/valuation/budgets/row_component_spec.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
spec/components/valuation/budgets/row_component_spec.rb on lines 62..68
spec/components/valuation/budgets/row_component_spec.rb on lines 93..99
spec/components/valuation/budgets/row_component_spec.rb on lines 120..126

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    8.times do |i|
      user = create(:user, :verified)
      Vote.create!(
        votable: proposal,
        voter: user,
Severity: Minor
Found in spec/requests/dashboard/successful_supports_spec.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
spec/requests/dashboard/group_supports_spec.rb on lines 8..12

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method comment_button_text has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def comment_button_text(parent_id, commentable)
    if commentable.class == Legislation::Question
      if parent_id.present?
        t("comments_helper.reply_button")
      else
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/comments_helper.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method create has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def create
    if is_heading_content_block?(@content_block.name)
      heading_content_block = new_heading_content_block
      if heading_content_block.save
        notice = t("admin.site_customization.content_blocks.create.notice")
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/admin/site_customization/content_blocks_controller.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method current_equal_password_validation has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def current_equal_password_validation
        if !new_record? && !encrypted_password_change.nil? && !erased?
          dummy = self.class.new
          dummy.encrypted_password = encrypted_password_change.first
Severity: Minor
Found in config/initializers/devise-security.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method conditional_validator? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def conditional_validator?(validator)
        return false unless validator.options[:unless]

        if validator.options[:unless].to_proc.arity.zero?
          instance_exec(&validator.options[:unless])
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/concerns/globalizable.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method confirmation_text has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def confirmation_text
      if options[:confirm] == true
        if action == :destroy
          t("admin.actions.confirm_delete", name: record_name)
        else
Severity: Minor
Found in app/components/admin/action_component.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        expect(page).to have_content "No supports"

        click_button "Support"

        expect(page).to have_content "1 support"
Severity: Minor
Found in spec/system/budgets/investments_spec.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
spec/system/budgets/investments_spec.rb on lines 1297..1307

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      within(".account-info") do
        expect(page).to have_content "Identified as"
        expect(page).to have_content user.username.to_s
        expect(page).to have_content user.email.to_s
        expect(page).to have_content user.document_number.to_s
Severity: Minor
Found in spec/system/management/managed_users_spec.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
spec/system/communities_spec.rb on lines 124..128
spec/system/management/managed_users_spec.rb on lines 21..25
spec/system/management/managed_users_spec.rb on lines 43..47

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method update has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def update
    if is_heading_content_block?(params[:site_customization_content_block][:name])
      heading_content_block = new_heading_content_block
      if heading_content_block.save
        @content_block.destroy!
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/admin/site_customization/content_blocks_controller.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  describe "valuator?" do
    it "is false when the user is not a valuator" do
      expect(subject.valuator?).to be false
    end
Severity: Major
Found in spec/models/user_spec.rb and 5 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
spec/models/user_spec.rb on lines 132..140
spec/models/user_spec.rb on lines 144..152
spec/models/user_spec.rb on lines 168..176
spec/models/user_spec.rb on lines 180..188
spec/models/user_spec.rb on lines 192..200

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  describe "public_for_api scope" do
    it "returns proposals" do
      proposal = create(:proposal)

      expect(Proposal.public_for_api).to eq [proposal]
Severity: Minor
Found in spec/models/proposal_spec.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
spec/models/debate_spec.rb on lines 720..730

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  describe "administrator?" do
    it "is false when the user is not an admin" do
      expect(subject.administrator?).to be false
    end
Severity: Major
Found in spec/models/user_spec.rb and 5 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
spec/models/user_spec.rb on lines 144..152
spec/models/user_spec.rb on lines 156..164
spec/models/user_spec.rb on lines 168..176
spec/models/user_spec.rb on lines 180..188
spec/models/user_spec.rb on lines 192..200

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    it "is invalid if debate_end_date is before debate_start_date" do
      process = build(:legislation_process, debate_start_date: Date.current,
                                            debate_end_date: Date.current - 1.day)
      expect(process).not_to be_valid
      expect(process.errors.messages[:debate_end_date])
Severity: Minor
Found in spec/models/legislation/process_spec.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
spec/models/legislation/process_spec.rb on lines 160..164
spec/models/legislation/process_spec.rb on lines 193..198
spec/models/legislation/process_spec.rb on lines 201..206

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    it "is invalid if allegations_end_date is before allegations_start_date" do
      process = build(:legislation_process, allegations_start_date: Date.current,
                                            allegations_end_date: Date.current - 1.day)
      expect(process).not_to be_valid
      expect(process.errors.messages[:allegations_end_date])
Severity: Minor
Found in spec/models/legislation/process_spec.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
spec/models/legislation/process_spec.rb on lines 160..164
spec/models/legislation/process_spec.rb on lines 179..184
spec/models/legislation/process_spec.rb on lines 193..198

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        expect(page).to have_content "No supports"

        click_button "Support"

        expect(page).to have_content "1 support"
Severity: Minor
Found in spec/system/budgets/investments_spec.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
spec/system/budgets/investments_spec.rb on lines 1275..1285

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    it "is shown when the valuating phase is over" do
      budget = create(:budget, :finished)
      create(:budget_investment, :visible_to_valuators, budget: budget, valuators: [valuator])

      render_inline Valuation::Budgets::RowComponent.new(budget: budget)
Severity: Minor
Found in spec/components/valuation/budgets/row_component_spec.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
spec/components/valuation/budgets/row_component_spec.rb on lines 62..68
spec/components/valuation/budgets/row_component_spec.rb on lines 93..99
spec/components/valuation/budgets/row_component_spec.rb on lines 111..117

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      within(".account-info") do
        expect(page).to have_content "Identified as"
        expect(page).to have_content user.username.to_s
        expect(page).to have_content user.email.to_s
        expect(page).to have_content user.document_number.to_s
Severity: Minor
Found in spec/system/management/managed_users_spec.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
spec/system/communities_spec.rb on lines 124..128
spec/system/management/managed_users_spec.rb on lines 21..25
spec/system/management/managed_users_spec.rb on lines 76..80

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language