Method check_default_and_range_data_types
has a Cognitive Complexity of 60 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_default_and_range_data_types
if @default and !@write_conversion
if @array_size
raise ArgumentError, "#{@name}: default must be an Array but is a #{default.class}" unless Array === @default
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_config
has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_config(cmd_or_tlm, default_endianness)
config = ''
if cmd_or_tlm == :TELEMETRY
if self.array_size
config << " ARRAY_ITEM #{self.name.to_s.quote_if_necessary} #{self.bit_offset} #{self.bit_size} #{self.data_type} #{self.array_size} \"#{self.description.to_s.gsub("\"", "'")}\""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method as_json
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def as_json
config = {}
config['name'] = self.name
config['bit_offset'] = self.bit_offset
config['bit_size'] = self.bit_size
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method from_json
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.from_json(hash)
# Convert strings to symbols
endianness = hash['endianness'] ? hash['endianness'].intern : nil
data_type = hash['data_type'] ? hash['data_type'].intern : nil
overflow = hash['overflow'] ? hash['overflow'].intern : nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method calculate_range
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def calculate_range
first = range.first
last = range.last
if data_type == :FLOAT
if bit_size == 32
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method clone
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clone
item = super()
item.format_string = self.format_string.clone if self.format_string
item.read_conversion = self.read_conversion.clone if self.read_conversion
item.write_conversion = self.write_conversion.clone if self.write_conversion
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(name, bit_offset, bit_size, data_type, endianness, array_size = nil, overflow = :ERROR)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
raise ArgumentError, "#{@name}: minimum must be a Integer but is a #{@range.first.class}" unless Integer === @range.first
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
raise ArgumentError, "#{@name}: maximum must be a Integer but is a #{@range.last.class}" unless Integer === @range.last
Method format_string=
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def format_string=(format_string)
if format_string
raise ArgumentError, "#{@name}: format_string must be a String but is a #{format_string.class}" unless String === format_string
raise ArgumentError, "#{@name}: format_string invalid '#{format_string}'" unless /%.*(b|B|d|i|o|u|x|X|e|E|f|g|G|a|A|c|p|s|%)/.match?(format_string)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
raise ArgumentError, "#{@name}: maximum must be a Float but is a #{@range.last.class}" unless Float === @range.last or Integer === @range.last
Method parameter_config
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parameter_config
if @id_value
value = @id_value
config = " ID_PARAMETER "
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
raise ArgumentError, "#{@name}: minimum must be a Float but is a #{@range.first.class}" unless Float === @range.first or Integer === @range.first
Method states=
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def states=(states)
if states
raise ArgumentError, "#{@name}: states must be a Hash but is a #{states.class}" unless Hash === states
# Make sure all states are in upper case
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if hash['read_conversion']
begin
item.read_conversion = Cosmos::const_get(hash['read_conversion']['class']).new(*hash['read_conversion']['params'])
rescue => error
Logger.instance.error "#{item.name} read_conversion of #{hash['read_conversion']} could not be instantiated due to #{error}"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if hash['write_conversion']
begin
item.write_conversion = Cosmos::const_get(hash['write_conversion']['class']).new(*hash['write_conversion']['params'])
rescue => error
Logger.instance.error "#{item.name} write_conversion of #{hash['write_conversion']} could not be instantiated due to #{error}"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
config << " ARRAY_ITEM #{self.name.to_s.quote_if_necessary} #{self.bit_offset} #{self.bit_size} #{self.data_type} #{self.array_size} \"#{self.description.to_s.gsub("\"", "'")}\""
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
config << " ARRAY_PARAMETER #{self.name.to_s.quote_if_necessary} #{self.bit_offset} #{self.bit_size} #{self.data_type} #{self.array_size} \"#{self.description.to_s.gsub("\"", "'")}\""
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76