Showing 68 of 68 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
JsonSchema.prototype.parse = function (value, propPath) {
switch (this.schema.type) {
case "number":
return parseNumber(this.schema, value, propPath);
case "integer":
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 213.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
JsonSchema.prototype.serialize = function (value, propPath) {
switch (this.schema.type) {
case "number":
return serializeNumber(this.schema, value, propPath);
case "integer":
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 213.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File json-schema.js
has 520 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"use strict";
module.exports = JsonSchema;
const tv4 = require("tv4");
Function mock
has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function mock (context, router, dataStore) {
router = router || context.router;
dataStore = (dataStore instanceof DataStore) ? dataStore : new MemoryDataStore();
let isDisabled = _.noop;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (schema.maximum) {
let maxDate = new Date(schema.maximum);
if (isNaN(maxDate.getTime())) {
throw ono({ status: 500 }, 'The "maximum" value in the Swagger API is invalid (%j)', schema.maximum);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 156.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (schema.minimum) {
let minDate = new Date(schema.minimum);
if (isNaN(minDate.getTime())) {
throw ono({ status: 500 }, 'The "minimum" value in the Swagger API is invalid (%j)', schema.minimum);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 156.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function fileServer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function fileServer (context, router, options) {
router = router || context.router;
// Override default options
options = _.merge({}, fileServer.defaultOptions, options);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseDate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function parseDate (schema, value, propPath) {
let parsedValue;
// Handle missing, required, and default
value = getValueToValidate(schema, value);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function pathParser
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function pathParser (context, router) {
router = util.isExpressRouter(router) ? router : context.router;
if (util.isExpressRouter(router)) {
// This is special path-param middleware, which sets `req.params`
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (schema.minLength) {
let minLength = parseInt(schema.minLength);
if (isNaN(minLength)) {
throw ono({ status: 500 }, 'The "minLength" value in the Swagger API is invalid (%j)', schema.minLength);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (schema.maxLength) {
let maxLength = parseInt(schema.maxLength);
if (isNaN(maxLength)) {
throw ono({ status: 500 }, 'The "maxLength" value in the Swagger API is invalid (%j)', schema.maxLength);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function call (dataStore, fn, args) {
let resources, callback;
// If only a single resource was passed-in, then only a single resource will be passed-back
let singleResource = _.first(args) instanceof Resource && (args.length === 0 || _.isFunction(args[1]));
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function mock
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function mock (context, router, dataStore) {
router = router || context.router;
dataStore = (dataStore instanceof DataStore) ? dataStore : new MemoryDataStore();
let isDisabled = _.noop;
Function pathParser
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function pathParser (context, router) {
router = util.isExpressRouter(router) ? router : context.router;
if (util.isExpressRouter(router)) {
// This is special path-param middleware, which sets `req.params`
Function fileServer
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function fileServer (context, router, options) {
router = router || context.router;
// Override default options
options = _.merge({}, fileServer.defaultOptions, options);
Function Middleware
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Middleware (sharedRouter) {
sharedRouter = util.isExpressRouter(sharedRouter) ? sharedRouter : undefined;
let self = this;
let context = new MiddlewareContext(sharedRouter);
Function call
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function call (dataStore, fn, args) {
let resources, callback;
// If only a single resource was passed-in, then only a single resource will be passed-back
let singleResource = _.first(args) instanceof Resource && (args.length === 0 || _.isFunction(args[1]));
Function parseDate
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function parseDate (schema, value, propPath) {
let parsedValue;
// Handle missing, required, and default
value = getValueToValidate(schema, value);
Function mockResponseHeaders
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function mockResponseHeaders (req, res, next) {
if (res.swagger) {
util.debug("Setting %d response headers...", _.keys(res.swagger.headers).length);
if (res.swagger.headers) {
Function requestMetadata
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function requestMetadata (context, router) {
router = router || context.router;
return [
swaggerMetadata,