File file_asset_descriptions.go
has 796 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// Code generated by SQLBoiler (https://github.com/volatiletech/sqlboiler). DO NOT EDIT.
// This file is meant to be re-generated in place and/or deleted at any time.
package kmodels
FileAssetDescription
has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type FileAssetDescription struct {
ID int `boil:"id" json:"id" toml:"id" yaml:"id"`
FileID int `boil:"file_id" json:"file_id" toml:"file_id" yaml:"file_id"`
Filedesc null.String `boil:"filedesc" json:"filedesc,omitempty" toml:"filedesc" yaml:"filedesc,omitempty"`
Lang null.String `boil:"lang" json:"lang,omitempty" toml:"lang" yaml:"lang,omitempty"`
Method FileAssetDescription.Upsert
has 99 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *FileAssetDescription) Upsert(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no file_asset_descriptions provided for upsert")
}
currTime := time.Now().In(boil.GetLocation())
Method FileAssetDescription.Insert
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *FileAssetDescription) Insert(exec boil.Executor, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no file_asset_descriptions provided for insertion")
}
Method FileAssetDescription.Upsert
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *FileAssetDescription) Upsert(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no file_asset_descriptions provided for upsert")
}
currTime := time.Now().In(boil.GetLocation())
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fileAssetDescriptionL.LoadFile
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (fileAssetDescriptionL) LoadFile(e boil.Executor, singular bool, maybeFileAssetDescription interface{}) error {
var slice []*FileAssetDescription
var object *FileAssetDescription
count := 1
Method FileAssetDescription.Upsert
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (o *FileAssetDescription) Upsert(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no file_asset_descriptions provided for upsert")
}
currTime := time.Now().In(boil.GetLocation())
Method FileAssetDescription.Upsert
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *FileAssetDescription) Upsert(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) error {
Method FileAssetDescription.UpsertP
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *FileAssetDescription) UpsertP(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) {
Method FileAssetDescription.Insert
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (o *FileAssetDescription) Insert(exec boil.Executor, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no file_asset_descriptions provided for insertion")
}
Method fileAssetDescriptionL.LoadFile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (fileAssetDescriptionL) LoadFile(e boil.Executor, singular bool, maybeFileAssetDescription interface{}) error {
var slice []*FileAssetDescription
var object *FileAssetDescription
count := 1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fileAssetDescriptionL.LoadFile
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (fileAssetDescriptionL) LoadFile(e boil.Executor, singular bool, maybeFileAssetDescription interface{}) error {
var slice []*FileAssetDescription
var object *FileAssetDescription
count := 1
Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *FileAssetDescription) Upsert(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no file_asset_descriptions provided for upsert")
}
currTime := time.Now().In(boil.GetLocation())
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 918.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *FileAssetDescription) Insert(exec boil.Executor, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no file_asset_descriptions provided for insertion")
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 727.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (fileAssetDescriptionL) LoadFile(e boil.Executor, singular bool, maybeFileAssetDescription interface{}) error {
var slice []*FileAssetDescription
var object *FileAssetDescription
count := 1
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 489.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 11 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *FileAssetDescription) Update(exec boil.Executor, whitelist ...string) error {
currTime := time.Now().In(boil.GetLocation())
o.UpdatedAt.Time = currTime
o.UpdatedAt.Valid = true
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 479.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *FileAssetDescription) SetFile(exec boil.Executor, insert bool, related *FileAsset) error {
var err error
if insert {
if err = related.Insert(exec); err != nil {
return errors.Wrap(err, "failed to insert into foreign table")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 381.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 14 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *FileAssetDescription) File(exec boil.Executor, mods ...qm.QueryMod) fileAssetQuery {
queryMods := []qm.QueryMod{
qm.Where("id=?", o.FileID),
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 118.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76