File labels.go
has 904 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// Code generated by SQLBoiler (https://github.com/volatiletech/sqlboiler). DO NOT EDIT.
// This file is meant to be re-generated in place and/or deleted at any time.
package kmodels
Label
has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type Label struct {
ID int `boil:"id" json:"id" toml:"id" yaml:"id"`
DictionaryID null.Int `boil:"dictionary_id" json:"dictionary_id,omitempty" toml:"dictionary_id" yaml:"dictionary_id,omitempty"`
Suid null.String `boil:"suid" json:"suid,omitempty" toml:"suid" yaml:"suid,omitempty"`
CreatedAt time.Time `boil:"created_at" json:"created_at" toml:"created_at" yaml:"created_at"`
Method Label.Upsert
has 97 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *Label) Upsert(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no labels provided for upsert")
}
currTime := time.Now().In(boil.GetLocation())
Method Label.Insert
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *Label) Insert(exec boil.Executor, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no labels provided for insertion")
}
Method Label.Upsert
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *Label) Upsert(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no labels provided for upsert")
}
currTime := time.Now().In(boil.GetLocation())
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method labelL.LoadContainers
has 64 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (labelL) LoadContainers(e boil.Executor, singular bool, maybeLabel interface{}) error {
var slice []*Label
var object *Label
count := 1
Method labelL.LoadContainers
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (labelL) LoadContainers(e boil.Executor, singular bool, maybeLabel interface{}) error {
var slice []*Label
var object *Label
count := 1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Label.Upsert
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (o *Label) Upsert(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no labels provided for upsert")
}
currTime := time.Now().In(boil.GetLocation())
Method Label.Upsert
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *Label) Upsert(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) error {
Method Label.UpsertP
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *Label) UpsertP(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) {
Method labelL.LoadContainers
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (labelL) LoadContainers(e boil.Executor, singular bool, maybeLabel interface{}) error {
var slice []*Label
var object *Label
count := 1
Method Label.Insert
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (o *Label) Insert(exec boil.Executor, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no labels provided for insertion")
}
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (labelL) LoadContainers(e boil.Executor, singular bool, maybeLabel interface{}) error {
var slice []*Label
var object *Label
count := 1
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 732.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *Label) RemoveContainers(exec boil.Executor, related ...*Container) error {
var err error
query := fmt.Sprintf(
"delete from \"containers_labels\" where \"label_id\" = $1 and \"container_id\" in (%s)",
strmangle.Placeholders(dialect.IndexPlaceholders, len(related), 2, 1),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 382.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *Label) AddContainers(exec boil.Executor, insert bool, related ...*Container) error {
var err error
for _, rel := range related {
if insert {
if err = rel.Insert(exec); err != nil {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 375.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *Label) SetContainers(exec boil.Executor, insert bool, related ...*Container) error {
query := "delete from \"containers_labels\" where \"label_id\" = $1"
values := []interface{}{o.ID}
if boil.DebugMode {
fmt.Fprintln(boil.DebugWriter, query)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 208.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *Label) Containers(exec boil.Executor, mods ...qm.QueryMod) containerQuery {
var queryMods []qm.QueryMod
if len(mods) != 0 {
queryMods = append(queryMods, mods...)
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 199.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func removeContainersFromLabelsSlice(o *Label, related []*Container) {
for _, rel := range related {
if rel.R == nil {
continue
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 191.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76