File roles_users.go
has 764 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// Code generated by SQLBoiler (https://github.com/volatiletech/sqlboiler). DO NOT EDIT.
// This file is meant to be re-generated in place and/or deleted at any time.
package kmodels
RolesUser
has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type RolesUser struct {
RoleID int `boil:"role_id" json:"role_id" toml:"role_id" yaml:"role_id"`
UserID int `boil:"user_id" json:"user_id" toml:"user_id" yaml:"user_id"`
R *rolesUserR `boil:"-" json:"-" toml:"-" yaml:"-"`
Method RolesUser.Upsert
has 92 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *RolesUser) Upsert(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no roles_users provided for upsert")
}
Method RolesUser.Upsert
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *RolesUser) Upsert(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no roles_users provided for upsert")
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method RolesUser.Insert
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *RolesUser) Insert(exec boil.Executor, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no roles_users provided for insertion")
}
Method rolesUserL.LoadUser
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (rolesUserL) LoadUser(e boil.Executor, singular bool, maybeRolesUser interface{}) error {
var slice []*RolesUser
var object *RolesUser
count := 1
Method RolesUser.Upsert
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (o *RolesUser) Upsert(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no roles_users provided for upsert")
}
Method RolesUser.UpsertP
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *RolesUser) UpsertP(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) {
Method RolesUser.Upsert
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *RolesUser) Upsert(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) error {
Method rolesUserL.LoadUser
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (rolesUserL) LoadUser(e boil.Executor, singular bool, maybeRolesUser interface{}) error {
var slice []*RolesUser
var object *RolesUser
count := 1
Method RolesUser.Insert
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (o *RolesUser) Insert(exec boil.Executor, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no roles_users provided for insertion")
}
Method rolesUserL.LoadUser
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (rolesUserL) LoadUser(e boil.Executor, singular bool, maybeRolesUser interface{}) error {
var slice []*RolesUser
var object *RolesUser
count := 1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *RolesUser) Upsert(exec boil.Executor, updateOnConflict bool, conflictColumns []string, updateColumns []string, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no roles_users provided for upsert")
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 821.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *RolesUser) Insert(exec boil.Executor, whitelist ...string) error {
if o == nil {
return errors.New("kmodels: no roles_users provided for insertion")
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 610.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (rolesUserL) LoadUser(e boil.Executor, singular bool, maybeRolesUser interface{}) error {
var slice []*RolesUser
var object *RolesUser
count := 1
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 489.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *RolesUser) Update(exec boil.Executor, whitelist ...string) error {
var err error
key := makeCacheKey(whitelist, nil)
rolesUserUpdateCacheMut.RLock()
cache, cached := rolesUserUpdateCache[key]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 428.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 14 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *RolesUser) User(exec boil.Executor, mods ...qm.QueryMod) userQuery {
queryMods := []qm.QueryMod{
qm.Where("id=?", o.UserID),
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 118.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76