File LexicalSelection.ts has 2308 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* Copyright (c) Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates.
*
* This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the
* LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.Function insertText has a Cognitive Complexity of 149 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
insertText(text: string): void {
const anchor = this.anchor;
const focus = this.focus;
const format = this.format;
const style = this.style;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function insertText has 285 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
insertText(text: string): void {
const anchor = this.anchor;
const focus = this.focus;
const format = this.format;
const style = this.style;Function modify has a Cognitive Complexity of 69 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
modify(
alter: 'move' | 'extend',
isBackward: boolean,
granularity: 'character' | 'word' | 'lineboundary',
): void {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function $internalResolveSelectionPoint has a Cognitive Complexity of 60 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $internalResolveSelectionPoint(
dom: Node,
offset: number,
lastPoint: null | PointType,
editor: LexicalEditor,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getTextContent has a Cognitive Complexity of 55 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getTextContent(): string {
const nodes = this.getNodes();
if (nodes.length === 0) {
return '';
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function deleteCharacter has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
deleteCharacter(isBackward: boolean): void {
const wasCollapsed = this.isCollapsed();
if (this.isCollapsed()) {
const anchor = this.anchor;
let anchorNode: TextNode | ElementNode | null = anchor.getNode();- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function updateDOMSelection has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function updateDOMSelection(
prevSelection: BaseSelection | null,
nextSelection: BaseSelection | null,
editor: LexicalEditor,
domSelection: Selection,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function formatText has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
formatText(formatType: TextFormatType): void {
if (this.isCollapsed()) {
this.toggleFormat(formatType);
// When changing format, we should stop composition
$setCompositionKey(null);- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function updateDOMSelection has 124 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function updateDOMSelection(
prevSelection: BaseSelection | null,
nextSelection: BaseSelection | null,
editor: LexicalEditor,
domSelection: Selection,Function modify has 110 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
modify(
alter: 'move' | 'extend',
isBackward: boolean,
granularity: 'character' | 'word' | 'lineboundary',
): void {Function extract has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
extract(): Array<LexicalNode> {
const selectedNodes = this.getNodes();
const selectedNodesLength = selectedNodes.length;
const lastIndex = selectedNodesLength - 1;
const anchor = this.anchor;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function $internalResolveSelectionPoint has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $internalResolveSelectionPoint(
dom: Node,
offset: number,
lastPoint: null | PointType,
editor: LexicalEditor,Function formatText has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
formatText(formatType: TextFormatType): void {
if (this.isCollapsed()) {
this.toggleFormat(formatType);
// When changing format, we should stop composition
$setCompositionKey(null);Function $updateSelectionResolveTextNodes has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $updateSelectionResolveTextNodes(selection: RangeSelection): void {
const anchor = selection.anchor;
const anchorOffset = anchor.offset;
const focus = selection.focus;
const focusOffset = focus.offset;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function deleteCharacter has 90 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
deleteCharacter(isBackward: boolean): void {
const wasCollapsed = this.isCollapsed();
if (this.isCollapsed()) {
const anchor = this.anchor;
let anchorNode: TextNode | ElementNode | null = anchor.getNode();Function $updateElementSelectionOnCreateDeleteNode has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function $updateElementSelectionOnCreateDeleteNode(
selection: RangeSelection,
parentNode: LexicalNode,
nodeOffset: number,
times = 1,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
RangeSelection has 28 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export class RangeSelection implements BaseSelection {
format: number;
style: string;
anchor: PointType;
focus: PointType;Function insertNodes has 80 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
insertNodes(nodes: Array<LexicalNode>): void {
if (nodes.length === 0) {
return;
}
if (this.anchor.key === 'root') {Function resolveSelectionPointOnBoundary has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function resolveSelectionPointOnBoundary(
point: TextPointType,
isBackward: boolean,
isCollapsed: boolean,
): void {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function insertNodes has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
insertNodes(nodes: Array<LexicalNode>): void {
if (nodes.length === 0) {
return;
}
if (this.anchor.key === 'root') {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function $wrapInlineNodes has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $wrapInlineNodes(nodes: LexicalNode[]) {
// We temporarily insert the topLevelNodes into an arbitrary ElementNode,
// since insertAfter does not work on nodes that have no parent (TO-DO: fix that).
const virtualRoot = $createParagraphNode();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getTextContent has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getTextContent(): string {
const nodes = this.getNodes();
if (nodes.length === 0) {
return '';
}Function getNodes has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getNodes(): Array<LexicalNode> {
const cachedNodes = this._cachedNodes;
if (cachedNodes !== null) {
return cachedNodes;
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function $internalCreateRangeSelection has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function $internalCreateRangeSelection(
lastSelection: null | BaseSelection,
domSelection: Selection | null,
editor: LexicalEditor,
event: UIEvent | Event | null,Function $updateElementSelectionOnCreateDeleteNode has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function $updateElementSelectionOnCreateDeleteNode(
selection: RangeSelection,
parentNode: LexicalNode,
nodeOffset: number,
times = 1,Function $updateSelectionResolveTextNodes has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $updateSelectionResolveTextNodes(selection: RangeSelection): void {
const anchor = selection.anchor;
const anchorOffset = anchor.offset;
const focus = selection.focus;
const focusOffset = focus.offset;Function $internalCreateRangeSelection has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function $internalCreateRangeSelection(
lastSelection: null | BaseSelection,
domSelection: Selection | null,
editor: LexicalEditor,
event: UIEvent | Event | null,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function $updateCaretSelectionForUnicodeCharacter has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $updateCaretSelectionForUnicodeCharacter(
selection: RangeSelection,
isBackward: boolean,
): void {
const anchor = selection.anchor;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function resolveSelectionPointOnBoundary has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function resolveSelectionPointOnBoundary(
point: TextPointType,
isBackward: boolean,
isCollapsed: boolean,
): void {Function moveSelectionPointToSibling has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function moveSelectionPointToSibling(
point: PointType,
node: LexicalNode,
parent: ElementNode,
prevSibling: LexicalNode | null,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function extract has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
extract(): Array<LexicalNode> {
const selectedNodes = this.getNodes();
const selectedNodesLength = selectedNodes.length;
const lastIndex = selectedNodesLength - 1;
const anchor = this.anchor;Function getNodes has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getNodes(): Array<LexicalNode> {
const cachedNodes = this._cachedNodes;
if (cachedNodes !== null) {
return cachedNodes;
}Function $internalResolveSelectionPoints has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $internalResolveSelectionPoints(
anchorDOM: null | Node,
anchorOffset: number,
focusDOM: null | Node,
focusOffset: number,Function deleteLine has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
deleteLine(isBackward: boolean): void {
if (this.isCollapsed()) {
// Since `domSelection.modify('extend', ..., 'lineboundary')` works well for text selections
// but doesn't properly handle selections which end on elements, a space character is added
// for such selections transforming their anchor's type to 'text'- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function $splitNodeAtPoint has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $splitNodeAtPoint(
node: LexicalNode,
offset: number,
): [parent: ElementNode, offset: number] {
const parent = node.getParent();Function moveSelectionPointToSibling has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function moveSelectionPointToSibling(
point: PointType,
node: LexicalNode,
parent: ElementNode,
prevSibling: LexicalNode | null,Function $removeSegment has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $removeSegment(
node: TextNode,
isBackward: boolean,
offset: number,
): void {Function applyDOMRange has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
applyDOMRange(range: StaticRange): void {
const editor = getActiveEditor();
const currentEditorState = editor.getEditorState();
const lastSelection = currentEditorState._selection;
const resolvedSelectionPoints = $internalResolveSelectionPoints(Function $wrapInlineNodes has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $wrapInlineNodes(nodes: LexicalNode[]) {
// We temporarily insert the topLevelNodes into an arbitrary ElementNode,
// since insertAfter does not work on nodes that have no parent (TO-DO: fix that).
const virtualRoot = $createParagraphNode();
Function $internalResolveSelectionPoints has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $internalResolveSelectionPoints(
anchorDOM: null | Node,
anchorOffset: number,
focusDOM: null | Node,
focusOffset: number,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function forwardDeletion has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
forwardDeletion(
anchor: PointType,
anchorNode: TextNode | ElementNode,
isBackward: boolean,
): boolean {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function $splitNodeAtPoint has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $splitNodeAtPoint(
node: LexicalNode,
offset: number,
): [parent: ElementNode, offset: number] {
const parent = node.getParent();- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function selectPointOnNode has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function selectPointOnNode(point: PointType, node: LexicalNode): void {
let key = node.__key;
let offset = point.offset;
let type: 'element' | 'text' = 'element';
if ($isTextNode(node)) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function $updateCaretSelectionForUnicodeCharacter has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $updateCaretSelectionForUnicodeCharacter(
selection: RangeSelection,
isBackward: boolean,
): void {
const anchor = selection.anchor;Function $normalizeSelectionPointsForBoundaries has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $normalizeSelectionPointsForBoundaries(
anchor: PointType,
focus: PointType,
lastSelection: null | BaseSelection,
): void {Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
isLineBreakNode ||
($isDecoratorNode(node) && node.isInline()) ||
($isElementNode(node) && node.isInline()) ||
$isTextNode(node) ||Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
} else if (
this.isCollapsed() &&
startOffset === 0 &&
(firstNode.isSegmented() ||
firstNode.isToken() ||Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
!isBackward &&
// Delete forward handle case
((anchor.type === 'element' &&
$isElementNode(anchorNode) &&Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
this.isCollapsed() &&
startOffset === firstNodeTextLength &&
(firstNode.isSegmented() ||
firstNode.isToken() ||Function $removeSegment has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $removeSegment(
node: TextNode,
isBackward: boolean,
offset: number,
): void {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function updateDOMSelection has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
prevSelection: BaseSelection | null,
nextSelection: BaseSelection | null,
editor: LexicalEditor,
domSelection: Selection,
tags: Set<string>,Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (descendant === null) {
resolvedElement = child;
} else {
child = descendant;
resolvedElement = $isElementNode(child)Function $internalMakeRangeSelection has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
anchorKey: NodeKey,
anchorOffset: number,
focusKey: NodeKey,
focusOffset: number,
anchorType: 'text' | 'element',Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if (node === lastNode) {
text = isBefore
? text.slice(0, focusOffset)
: text.slice(0, anchorOffset);
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (node === lastNode) {
if (
anchor.type !== 'element' ||
focus.type !== 'element' ||
focus.offset === anchor.offsetAvoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ($isElementNode(firstValidNode)) {
firstValidNode.selectStart();
} else {
firstValidNode.getParentOrThrow().selectStart();
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ($isElementNode(lastValidNode)) {
lastValidNode.selectEnd();
} else {
lastValidNode.getParentOrThrow().selectEnd();
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (
anchorNode.is(focusNode) ||
(isBackward && offset !== 0) ||
(!isBackward && offset !== textContentSize)
) {Function $internalResolveSelectionPoints has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
anchorDOM: null | Node,
anchorOffset: number,
focusDOM: null | Node,
focusOffset: number,
editor: LexicalEditor,Function applySelectionTransforms has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function applySelectionTransforms(
nextEditorState: EditorState,
editor: LexicalEditor,
): void {
const prevEditorState = editor.getEditorState();- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!firstAndLastElementsAreEqual) {
insertionTarget.insertAfter(lastNodeChild, false);
}Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
} else if (
(isCollapsed || isBackward) &&
nextSibling === null &&
$isElementNode(parent) &&
parent.isInline() &&Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
anchorOffset === nextAnchorOffset &&
focusOffset === nextFocusOffset &&
anchorDOMNode === nextAnchorNode &&
focusDOMNode === nextFocusNode && // Badly interpreted range selection when collapsed - #1482Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
!tags.has('skip-scroll-into-view') &&
nextSelection.isCollapsed() &&
rootElement !== null &&
rootElement === document.activeElementConsider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
isCollapsed &&
(prevSelection === null ||
anchorFormatOrStyleChanged ||
($isRangeSelection(prevSelection) &&Function adjustPointOffsetForMergedSibling has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
point: PointType,
isBefore: boolean,
key: NodeKey,
target: TextNode,
textLength: number,Function moveSelectionPointToSibling has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
point: PointType,
node: LexicalNode,
parent: ElementNode,
prevSibling: LexicalNode | null,
nextSibling: LexicalNode | null,Function isBefore has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
isBefore(b: PointType): boolean {
let aNode = this.getNode();
let bNode = b.getNode();
const aOffset = this.offset;
const bOffset = b.offset;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [resolvedAnchorPoint, resolvedFocusPoint];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [parent, node.getIndexWithinParent() + 1];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return null;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return new RangeSelection(
resolvedAnchorPoint,
resolvedFocusPoint,
!$isRangeSelection(lastSelection) ? 0 : lastSelection.format,
!$isRangeSelection(lastSelection) ? '' : lastSelection.style,Function insertRawText has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
insertRawText(text: string): void {
const parts = text.split(/(\r?\n|\t)/);
const nodes = [];
const length = parts.length;
for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function $moveSelectionPointToEnd has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function $moveSelectionPointToEnd(
point: PointType,
node: LexicalNode,
): void {
if ($isElementNode(node)) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export type ElementPointType = {
_selection: BaseSelection;
getNode: () => ElementNode;
is: (point: PointType) => boolean;
isBefore: (point: PointType) => boolean;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 131.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export type TextPointType = {
_selection: BaseSelection;
getNode: () => TextNode;
is: (point: PointType) => boolean;
isBefore: (point: PointType) => boolean;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 131.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($isElementNode(focusNode)) {
const childSize = focusNode.getChildrenSize();
const focusOffsetAtEnd = focusOffset >= childSize;
const child = focusOffsetAtEnd
? focusNode.getChildAtIndex(childSize - 1)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 125.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($isElementNode(anchorNode)) {
const childSize = anchorNode.getChildrenSize();
const anchorOffsetAtEnd = anchorOffset >= childSize;
const child = anchorOffsetAtEnd
? anchorNode.getChildAtIndex(childSize - 1)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 125.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (parentNode.is(lastPointNode)) {
const lastPointOffset = lastPoint.offset;
if (
(nodeOffset <= lastPointOffset && times > 0) ||
(nodeOffset < lastPointOffset && times < 0)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 87.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (parentNode.is(firstPointNode)) {
const firstPointOffset = firstPoint.offset;
if (
(nodeOffset <= firstPointOffset && times > 0) ||
(nodeOffset < firstPointOffset && times < 0)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 87.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.isCollapsed() &&
startOffset === 0 &&
(firstNode.isSegmented() ||
firstNode.isToken() ||
!firstNode.canInsertTextBefore() ||- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.isCollapsed() &&
startOffset === firstNodeTextLength &&
(firstNode.isSegmented() ||
firstNode.isToken() ||
!firstNode.canInsertTextAfter() ||- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
delete(key: NodeKey): void {
this.dirty = true;
this._nodes.delete(key);
this._cachedNodes = null;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
add(key: NodeKey): void {
this.dirty = true;
this._nodes.add(key);
this._cachedNodes = null;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($isElementNode(aNode)) {
const aNodeDescendant = aNode.getDescendantByIndex<ElementNode>(aOffset);
aNode = aNodeDescendant != null ? aNodeDescendant : aNode;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($isElementNode(firstNode)) {
const firstNodeDescendant =
firstNode.getDescendantByIndex<ElementNode>(startOffset);
firstNode = firstNodeDescendant != null ? firstNodeDescendant : firstNode;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($isElementNode(bNode)) {
const bNodeDescendant = bNode.getDescendantByIndex<ElementNode>(bOffset);
bNode = bNodeDescendant != null ? bNodeDescendant : bNode;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($isTextNode(parentSibling)) {
point.key = parentSibling.__key;
point.offset = parentSibling.getTextContent().length;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if ($isTextNode(prevSibling)) {
point.key = prevSibling.__key;
point.offset = prevSibling.getTextContent().length;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76