Sign upLogin

CDJ11/CDJ

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 4,066 of 4,066 total issues

ReDoS based DoS vulnerability in Active Support’s underscore
Open

    activesupport (4.2.10)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2023-22796

URL: https://github.com/rails/rails/releases/tag/v7.0.4.1

Solution: upgrade to >= 5.2.8.15, ~> 5.2.8, >= 6.1.7.1, ~> 6.1.7, >= 7.0.4.1

Percent-encoded cookies can be used to overwrite existing prefixed cookie names
Open

    rack (1.6.11)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2020-8184

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/g/rubyonrails-security/c/OWtmozPH9Ak

Solution: upgrade to ~> 2.1.4, >= 2.2.3

Possible DoS Vulnerability in Action Controller Token Authentication
Open

    actionpack (4.2.10)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2021-22904

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/g/rubyonrails-security/c/Pf1TjkOBdyQ

Solution: upgrade to ~> 5.2.4.6, ~> 5.2.6, >= 6.0.3.7, ~> 6.0.3, >= 6.1.3.2

Ability to forge per-form CSRF tokens given a global CSRF token
Open

    actionpack (4.2.10)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2020-8166

Criticality: Medium

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/NOjKiGeXUgw

Solution: upgrade to >= 5.2.4.3, ~> 5.2.4, >= 6.0.3.1

Possible RCE escalation bug with Serialized Columns in Active Record
Open

    activerecord (4.2.10)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2022-32224

Criticality: Critical

URL: https://groups.google.com/g/rubyonrails-security/c/MmFO3LYQE8U

Solution: upgrade to >= 5.2.8.1, ~> 5.2.8, >= 6.0.5.1, ~> 6.0.5, >= 6.1.6.1, ~> 6.1.6, >= 7.0.3.1

Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Multipart Parsing
Open

    rack (1.6.11)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2022-30122

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/g/ruby-security-ann/c/L2Axto442qk

Solution: upgrade to >= 2.0.9.1, ~> 2.0.9, >= 2.1.4.1, ~> 2.1.4, >= 2.2.3.1

Denial of service via header parsing in Rack
Open

    rack (1.6.11)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2022-44570

URL: https://github.com/rack/rack/releases/tag/v3.0.4.1

Solution: upgrade to >= 2.0.9.2, ~> 2.0.9, >= 2.1.4.2, ~> 2.1.4, >= 2.2.6.2, ~> 2.2.6, >= 3.0.4.1

Devise Gem for Ruby confirmation token validation with a blank string
Open

    devise (3.5.10)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2019-16109

Criticality: Medium

URL: https://github.com/plataformatec/devise/issues/5071

Solution: upgrade to >= 4.7.1

Information Exposure with Puma when used with Rails
Open

    puma (3.11.4)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2022-23634

Criticality: High

URL: https://github.com/puma/puma/security/advisories/GHSA-rmj8-8hhh-gv5h

Solution: upgrade to ~> 4.3.11, >= 5.6.2

Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Content-Disposition parsing
Open

    rack (1.6.11)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2022-44571

URL: https://github.com/rack/rack/releases/tag/v3.0.4.1

Solution: upgrade to >= 2.0.9.2, ~> 2.0.9, >= 2.1.4.2, ~> 2.1.4, >= 2.2.6.1, ~> 2.2.6, >= 3.0.4.1

Possible shell escape sequence injection vulnerability in Rack
Open

    rack (1.6.11)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2022-30123

Criticality: Critical

URL: https://groups.google.com/g/ruby-security-ann/c/LWB10kWzag8

Solution: upgrade to >= 2.0.9.1, ~> 2.0.9, >= 2.1.4.1, ~> 2.1.4, >= 2.2.3.1

Possible DoS Vulnerability in Active Record PostgreSQL adapter
Open

    activerecord (4.2.10)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2021-22880

Criticality: Medium

URL: https://groups.google.com/g/rubyonrails-security/c/ZzUqCh9vyhI

Solution: upgrade to >= 5.2.4.5, ~> 5.2.4, >= 6.0.3.5, ~> 6.0.3, >= 6.1.2.1

Potentially unintended unmarshalling of user-provided objects in MemCacheStore and RedisCacheStore
Open

    activesupport (4.2.10)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2020-8165

Criticality: Critical

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/bv6fW4S0Y1c

Solution: upgrade to >= 5.2.4.3, ~> 5.2.4, >= 6.0.3.1

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

feature 'Commenting topics from proposals' do
  let(:user)     { create :user }
  let(:proposal) { create :proposal }

  scenario 'Index' do
Severity: Major
Found in spec/features/comments/topics_spec.rb and 1 other location - About 1 wk to fix
spec/features/comments/topics_spec.rb on lines 558..1105

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 1862.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

feature 'Commenting topics from budget investments' do
  let(:user)       { create :user }
  let(:investment) { create :budget_investment }

  scenario 'Index' do
Severity: Major
Found in spec/features/comments/topics_spec.rb and 1 other location - About 1 wk to fix
spec/features/comments/topics_spec.rb on lines 4..551

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 1862.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

feature 'Proposal Notifications' do

  xscenario "Send a notification" do
    author = create(:user)
    proposal = create(:proposal, author: author)
Severity: Major
Found in spec/custom/features/proposal_notifications_spec.rb and 1 other location - About 4 days to fix
spec/features/proposal_notifications_spec.rb on lines 3..377

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 1092.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

feature 'Proposal Notifications' do

  xscenario "Send a notification" do
    author = create(:user)
    proposal = create(:proposal, author: author)
Severity: Major
Found in spec/features/proposal_notifications_spec.rb and 1 other location - About 4 days to fix
spec/custom/features/proposal_notifications_spec.rb on lines 3..377

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 1092.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

File proposals_spec.rb has 1385 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

require 'rails_helper'

feature 'Proposals' do

  scenario 'Disabled with a feature flag' do
Severity: Major
Found in spec/features/proposals_spec.rb - About 3 days to fix

    File investments_spec.rb has 1317 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    require 'rails_helper'
require 'sessions_helper'

feature 'Budget Investments' do
    Severity: Major
    Found in spec/features/budgets/investments_spec.rb - About 3 days to fix

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      feature 'Admin shifts' do

  background do
    admin = create(:administrator)
    login_as(admin.user)
      Severity: Major
      Found in spec/features/admin/poll/shifts_spec.rb and 1 other location - About 2 days to fix
      spec/custom/features/admin/poll/shifts_spec.rb on lines 3..189

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 697.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Severity
      Category
      Status
      Source
      Language