spec/features/admin/activity_spec.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

File activity_spec.rb has 259 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

require 'rails_helper'

feature 'Admin activity' do

  background do
Severity: Minor
Found in spec/features/admin/activity_spec.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      context "Debates" do
        scenario "Shows moderation activity on debates", :js do
          debate = create(:debate)
    
          visit debate_path(debate)
    Severity: Major
    Found in spec/features/admin/activity_spec.rb and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
    spec/features/admin/activity_spec.rb on lines 10..67

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 163.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      context "Proposals" do
        scenario "Shows moderation activity on proposals", :js do
          proposal = create(:proposal)
    
          visit proposal_path(proposal)
    Severity: Major
    Found in spec/features/admin/activity_spec.rb and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
    spec/features/admin/activity_spec.rb on lines 72..129

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 163.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        scenario "Shows moderation activity from debates moderation screen" do
          debate1 = create(:debate)
          debate2 = create(:debate)
          debate3 = create(:debate)
    
    
    Severity: Major
    Found in spec/features/admin/activity_spec.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
    spec/features/admin/activity_spec.rb on lines 236..259

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 81.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        scenario "Shows moderation activity from proposals moderation screen" do
          proposal1 = create(:proposal)
          proposal2 = create(:proposal)
          proposal3 = create(:proposal)
    
    
    Severity: Major
    Found in spec/features/admin/activity_spec.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
    spec/features/admin/activity_spec.rb on lines 262..285

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 81.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Use let instead of an instance variable. (http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop-rspec/RuboCop/Cop/RSpec/InstanceVariable)
    Open

            expect(page).to have_content(@admin.user.username)

    Use let instead of an instance variable. (http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop-rspec/RuboCop/Cop/RSpec/InstanceVariable)
    Open

            expect(page).to have_content(@admin.user.username)

    Use let instead of an instance variable. (http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop-rspec/RuboCop/Cop/RSpec/InstanceVariable)
    Open

            expect(page).to have_content(@admin.user.username)

    Use let instead of an instance variable. (http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop-rspec/RuboCop/Cop/RSpec/InstanceVariable)
    Open

          proposal_notification.moderate_system_email(@admin.user)

    Use let instead of an instance variable. (http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop-rspec/RuboCop/Cop/RSpec/InstanceVariable)
    Open

        login_as(@admin.user)

    Use let instead of an instance variable. (http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop-rspec/RuboCop/Cop/RSpec/InstanceVariable)
    Open

            expect(page).to have_content(@admin.user.username)

    Use let instead of an instance variable. (http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop-rspec/RuboCop/Cop/RSpec/InstanceVariable)
    Open

            expect(page).to have_content(@admin.user.username)

    Use let instead of an instance variable. (http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop-rspec/RuboCop/Cop/RSpec/InstanceVariable)
    Open

            expect(page).to have_content(@admin.user.username)

    Use let instead of an instance variable. (http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop-rspec/RuboCop/Cop/RSpec/InstanceVariable)
    Open

            expect(page).to have_content(@admin.user.username)

    Use let instead of an instance variable. (http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop-rspec/RuboCop/Cop/RSpec/InstanceVariable)
    Open

            expect(page).to have_content(@admin.user.username)

    Use let instead of an instance variable. (http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop-rspec/RuboCop/Cop/RSpec/InstanceVariable)
    Open

            expect(page).to have_content(@admin.user.username)

    Use let instead of an instance variable. (http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop-rspec/RuboCop/Cop/RSpec/InstanceVariable)
    Open

            expect(page).to have_content(@admin.user.username)

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status