File APIAuthHelpers.java
has 382 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
package gov.cms.dpc.testing;
import ca.uhn.fhir.context.FhirContext;
import ca.uhn.fhir.rest.client.api.IClientInterceptor;
import ca.uhn.fhir.rest.client.api.IGenericClient;
APIAuthHelpers
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
public class APIAuthHelpers {
public static final String TASK_URL = "http://localhost:9900/tasks/";
public static final String KEY_VERIFICATION_SNIPPET = "This is the snippet used to verify a key pair in DPC.";
private static final String CLIENT_ASSERTION_TYPE = "urn:ietf:params:oauth:client-assertion-type:jwt-bearer";
private static final ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
Method jwtAuthFlow
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
public static AuthResponse jwtAuthFlow(String baseURL, String macaroon, UUID keyID, PrivateKey privateKey) throws IOException, URISyntaxException {
/* TODO revert this workaround to previous version of code
* - git diff f2d3abe1f23e4d1ad2f2a01 5d799c57712418de674 <<< green is good
* see also https://github.com/CMSgov/dpc-app/pull/849
*/
Method buildAuthenticatedClient
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
public static IGenericClient buildAuthenticatedClient(FhirContext ctx, String baseURL, String macaroon, UUID keyID, PrivateKey privateKey, boolean disableSSLCheck, boolean enableRequestLog) {
Method getTrustingManager
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static TrustManager[] getTrustingManager() {
return new TrustManager[]{new X509TrustManager() {
@Override
public X509Certificate[] getAcceptedIssuers() {
return null;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method buildAuthenticatedClient
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
public static IGenericClient buildAuthenticatedClient(FhirContext ctx, String baseURL, String macaroon, UUID keyID, PrivateKey privateKey, boolean disableSSLCheck) {
Method buildAdminClient
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
public static IGenericClient buildAdminClient(FhirContext ctx, String baseURL, String macaroon, boolean disableSSLCheck, boolean enableRequestLog) {
Method buildAuthenticatedClient
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
public static IGenericClient buildAuthenticatedClient(FhirContext ctx, String baseURL, String macaroon, UUID keyID, PrivateKey privateKey) {
Replace this use of System.out or System.err by a logger. Open
System.out.println("Refreshing access token");
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
When logging a message there are several important requirements which must be fulfilled:
- The user must be able to easily retrieve the logs
- The format of all logged message must be uniform to allow the user to easily read the log
- Logged data must actually be recorded
- Sensitive data must only be logged securely
If a program directly writes to the standard outputs, there is absolutely no way to comply with those requirements. That's why defining and using a dedicated logger is highly recommended.
Noncompliant Code Example
System.out.println("My Message"); // Noncompliant
Compliant Solution
logger.log("My Message");
See
- CERT, ERR02-J. - Prevent exceptions while logging data
Replace this use of System.out or System.err by a logger. Open
System.out.println("Refreshing access token");
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
When logging a message there are several important requirements which must be fulfilled:
- The user must be able to easily retrieve the logs
- The format of all logged message must be uniform to allow the user to easily read the log
- Logged data must actually be recorded
- Sensitive data must only be logged securely
If a program directly writes to the standard outputs, there is absolutely no way to comply with those requirements. That's why defining and using a dedicated logger is highly recommended.
Noncompliant Code Example
System.out.println("My Message"); // Noncompliant
Compliant Solution
logger.log("My Message");
See
- CERT, ERR02-J. - Prevent exceptions while logging data
Return an empty array instead of null. Open
return null;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Returning null
instead of an actual array or collection forces callers of the method to explicitly test for nullity, making them more
complex and less readable.
Moreover, in many cases, null
is used as a synonym for empty.
Noncompliant Code Example
public static List<Result> getResults() { return null; // Noncompliant } public static Result[] getResults() { return null; // Noncompliant } public static void main(String[] args) { Result[] results = getResults(); if (results != null) { // Nullity test required to prevent NPE for (Result result: results) { /* ... */ } } }
Compliant Solution
public static List<Result> getResults() { return Collections.emptyList(); // Compliant } public static Result[] getResults() { return new Result[0]; } public static void main(String[] args) { for (Result result: getResults()) { /* ... */ } }
See
- CERT, MSC19-C. - For functions that return an array, prefer returning an empty array over a null value
- CERT, MET55-J. - Return an empty array or collection instead of a null value for methods that return an array or collection
Define and throw a dedicated exception instead of using a generic one. Open
throw new RuntimeException("Cannot create custom SSL context", e);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Using such generic exceptions as Error
, RuntimeException
, Throwable
, and Exception
prevents
calling methods from handling true, system-generated exceptions differently than application-generated errors.
Noncompliant Code Example
public void foo(String bar) throws Throwable { // Noncompliant throw new RuntimeException("My Message"); // Noncompliant }
Compliant Solution
public void foo(String bar) { throw new MyOwnRuntimeException("My Message"); }
Exceptions
Generic exceptions in the signatures of overriding methods are ignored, because overriding method has to follow signature of the throw declaration in the superclass. The issue will be raised on superclass declaration of the method (or won't be raised at all if superclass is not part of the analysis).
@Override public void myMethod() throws Exception {...}
Generic exceptions are also ignored in the signatures of methods that make calls to methods that throw generic exceptions.
public void myOtherMethod throws Exception { doTheThing(); // this method throws Exception }
See
- MITRE, CWE-397 - Declaration of Throws for Generic Exception
- CERT, ERR07-J. - Do not throw RuntimeException, Exception, or Throwable
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "Bearer " 3 times. Open
post.setHeader(HttpHeaders.AUTHORIZATION, "Bearer " + macaroon);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Use static access with "java.util.Date" for "from". Open
.setExpiration(Date.from(Instant.now().plus(5, ChronoUnit.MINUTES).minus(30, ChronoUnit.SECONDS)))
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
In the interest of code clarity, static
members of a base
class should never be accessed using a derived type's name.
Doing so is confusing and could create the illusion that two different static members exist.
Noncompliant Code Example
class Parent { public static int counter; } class Child extends Parent { public Child() { Child.counter++; // Noncompliant } }
Compliant Solution
class Parent { public static int counter; } class Child extends Parent { public Child() { Parent.counter++; } }
%n should be used in place of \n to produce the platform-specific line separator. Open
return String.format("-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----\n%s\n-----END PUBLIC KEY-----\n", encoded);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Because printf
-style format strings are interpreted at runtime, rather than validated by the compiler, they can contain errors that
result in the wrong strings being created. This rule statically validates the correlation of printf
-style format strings to their
arguments when calling the format(...)
methods of java.util.Formatter
, java.lang.String
,
java.io.PrintStream
, MessageFormat
, and java.io.PrintWriter
classes and the printf(...)
methods of
java.io.PrintStream
or java.io.PrintWriter
classes.
Noncompliant Code Example
String.format("First {0} and then {1}", "foo", "bar"); //Noncompliant. Looks like there is a confusion with the use of {{java.text.MessageFormat}}, parameters "foo" and "bar" will be simply ignored here String.format("Display %3$d and then %d", 1, 2, 3); //Noncompliant; the second argument '2' is unused String.format("Too many arguments %d and %d", 1, 2, 3); //Noncompliant; the third argument '3' is unused String.format("First Line\n"); //Noncompliant; %n should be used in place of \n to produce the platform-specific line separator String.format("Is myObject null ? %b", myObject); //Noncompliant; when a non-boolean argument is formatted with %b, it prints true for any nonnull value, and false for null. Even if intended, this is misleading. It's better to directly inject the boolean value (myObject == null in this case) String.format("value is " + value); // Noncompliant String s = String.format("string without arguments"); // Noncompliant MessageFormat.format("Result '{0}'.", value); // Noncompliant; String contains no format specifiers. (quote are discarding format specifiers) MessageFormat.format("Result {0}.", value, value); // Noncompliant; 2nd argument is not used MessageFormat.format("Result {0}.", myObject.toString()); // Noncompliant; no need to call toString() on objects java.util.Logger logger; logger.log(java.util.logging.Level.SEVERE, "Result {0}.", myObject.toString()); // Noncompliant; no need to call toString() on objects logger.log(java.util.logging.Level.SEVERE, "Result.", new Exception()); // compliant, parameter is an exception logger.log(java.util.logging.Level.SEVERE, "Result '{0}'", 14); // Noncompliant - String contains no format specifiers. logger.log(java.util.logging.Level.SEVERE, "Result " + param, exception); // Noncompliant; Lambda should be used to differ string concatenation. org.slf4j.Logger slf4jLog; org.slf4j.Marker marker; slf4jLog.debug(marker, "message {}"); slf4jLog.debug(marker, "message", 1); // Noncompliant - String contains no format specifiers. org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger log4jLog; log4jLog.debug("message", 1); // Noncompliant - String contains no format specifiers.
Compliant Solution
String.format("First %s and then %s", "foo", "bar"); String.format("Display %2$d and then %d", 1, 3); String.format("Too many arguments %d %d", 1, 2); String.format("First Line%n"); String.format("Is myObject null ? %b", myObject == null); String.format("value is %d", value); String s = "string without arguments"; MessageFormat.format("Result {0}.", value); MessageFormat.format("Result '{0}' = {0}", value); MessageFormat.format("Result {0}.", myObject); java.util.Logger logger; logger.log(java.util.logging.Level.SEVERE, "Result {0}.", myObject); logger.log(java.util.logging.Level.SEVERE, "Result {0}'", 14); logger.log(java.util.logging.Level.SEVERE, exception, () -> "Result " + param); org.slf4j.Logger slf4jLog; org.slf4j.Marker marker; slf4jLog.debug(marker, "message {}"); slf4jLog.debug(marker, "message {}", 1); org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger log4jLog; log4jLog.debug("message {}", 1);
See
- CERT, FIO47-C. - Use valid format strings
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private void refreshAuthToken() {
System.out.println("Refreshing access token");
try {
final AuthResponse authResponse = jwtAuthFlow(this.baseURL, this.clientToken, this.keyID, this.privateKey);
// Set the refresh time to be 30 seconds before expiration
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private void refreshAuthToken() {
System.out.println("Refreshing access token");
try {
final AuthResponse authResponse = jwtAuthFlow(this.baseURL, this.clientToken, this.keyID, this.privateKey);
// Set the refresh time to be 30 seconds before expiration
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static class MacaroonsInterceptor implements IClientInterceptor {
private String macaroon;
public MacaroonsInterceptor(String macaroon) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Wontfix
HAPISmartInterceptor(String baseURL, String clientToken, UUID keyID, PrivateKey privateKey) {
this.baseURL = baseURL;
this.clientToken = clientToken;
this.keyID = keyID;
this.privateKey = privateKey;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Wontfix
HttpClientAuthInterceptor(String baseURL, String clientToken, UUID keyID, PrivateKey privateKey) {
this.baseURL = baseURL;
this.clientToken = clientToken;
this.keyID = keyID;
this.privateKey = privateKey;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
final String macaroon = MacaroonsBuilder
.modify(MacaroonsBuilder.deserialize(goldenMacaroon).get(0))
.add_first_party_caveat(String.format("organization_id = %s", organizationID))
.getMacaroon().serialize(MacaroonVersion.SerializationVersion.V2_JSON);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76