Showing 315 of 390 total issues
Method processJobBatchPartial
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public List<JobQueueBatchFile> processJobBatchPartial(UUID aggregatorID, IJobQueue queue, JobQueueBatch job, String mbi) {
StopWatch stopWatch = StopWatch.createStarted();
Optional<OutcomeReason> failReason = Optional.empty();
Optional<Flowable<Resource>> flowable = Optional.empty();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (!("classList" in document.createElement("_")) || document.createElementNS && !("classList" in document.createElementNS("http://www.w3.org/2000/svg", "g"))) {
(function (view) {
"use strict";
Method API.RunGroupTests
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *API) RunGroupTests() {
const endpoint = "Group"
// Create organization (and delete at the end) and setup accesstoken
auth := api.SetUpOrgAuth()
Method fromFHIR
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Confirmed
@Override
public OrganizationEntity fromFHIR(FHIREntityConverter converter, Organization resource) {
final OrganizationEntity entity = new OrganizationEntity();
// Add the profile metadata
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private void refreshAuthToken() {
System.out.println("Refreshing access token");
try {
final AuthResponse authResponse = jwtAuthFlow(this.baseURL, this.clientToken, this.keyID, this.privateKey);
// Set the refresh time to be 30 seconds before expiration
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private void refreshAuthToken() {
System.out.println("Refreshing access token");
try {
final AuthResponse authResponse = jwtAuthFlow(this.baseURL, this.clientToken, this.keyID, this.privateKey);
// Set the refresh time to be 30 seconds before expiration
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function 9
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{"../compose":6,"../delegate":7}],9:[function(require,module,exports){
'use strict';
function _defineProperty(obj, key, value) { if (key in obj) { Object.defineProperty(obj, key, { value: value, enumerable: true, configurable: true, writable: true }); } else { obj[key] = value; } return obj; }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method checkJobStatus
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Confirmed
@Override
@Path("/{jobID}")
@GET
@Timed
@ExceptionMetered
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function 18
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],18:[function(require,module,exports){
'use strict';
var _typeof = typeof Symbol === "function" && typeof Symbol.iterator === "symbol" ? function (obj) { return typeof obj; } : function (obj) { return obj && typeof Symbol === "function" && obj.constructor === Symbol && obj !== Symbol.prototype ? "symbol" : typeof obj; };
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method everything
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@GET
@FHIR
@Path("/{patientID}/$everything")
@PathAuthorizer(type = DPCResourceType.Patient, pathParam = "patientID")
@Timed
Method processJobBatch
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Trace
protected void processJobBatch(JobQueueBatch job) {
final String queueCompleteTime = SplunkTimestamp.getSplunkTimestamp();
try {
MDC.put(MDCConstants.JOB_ID, job.getJobID().toString());
Method buildRangedRequest
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private Response buildRangedRequest(String fileID, File file, RangeHeader range) {
if (!range.getUnit().equals(ACCEPTED_RANGE_VALUE)) {
throw new WebApplicationException("Only `bytes` are acceptable as ranges", Response.Status.REQUESTED_RANGE_NOT_SATISFIABLE);
}
final long rangeStart = range.getStart() < 0 ? 0 : range.getStart();
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function removeElementsByClass(className){
var elements = document.getElementsByClassName(className);
while(elements.length > 0){
elements[0].parentNode.removeChild(elements[0]);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function removeElementsByClass(className){
var elements = document.getElementsByClassName(className);
while(elements.length > 0){
elements[0].parentNode.removeChild(elements[0]);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function importResponseFile
has 14 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func importResponseFile(bucket string, file string) (int, int, string, error) {
log.Infof("Importing opt out file: %s (bucket: %s)", file, bucket)
metadata, err := ParseMetadata(bucket, file)
if err != nil {
log.Warningf("Failed to parse opt out file metadata: %s", err)
Method registerOrganization
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String registerOrganization(IGenericClient client, IParser parser, String organizationID, String organizationNPI, String adminURL) throws IOException {
// Random number generator for Org NPI
// Register an organization, and a token
// Read in the test file
String macaroon;
Method initialize
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void initialize(Bootstrap<DPCConsentConfiguration> bootstrap) {
JerseyGuiceUtils.reset();
// Enable variable substitution with environment variables
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try (CloseableHttpResponse response = httpClient.execute(post)) {
if (!HttpStatus.isSuccess(response.getStatusLine().getStatusCode())) {
System.err.println("Error fetching organization: " + response.getStatusLine().getReasonPhrase());
System.exit(1);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 86.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try (CloseableHttpResponse response = httpClient.execute(post)) {
if (!HttpStatus.isSuccess(response.getStatusLine().getStatusCode())) {
System.err.println("Error fetching organization: " + response.getStatusLine().getReasonPhrase());
System.exit(1);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 86.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module RedisStore
class MailThrottleStore
# Redis interface for rate limiting user mail
NAMESPACE = 'mail_throttle'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76