File ProdLocationEditor.php
has 758 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/*******************************************************************************
Copyright 2013 Whole Foods Community Co-op
Method get_list_view
has 193 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function get_list_view()
{
global $FANNIE_OP_DB;
$dbc = FannieDB::get($FANNIE_OP_DB);
Method get_start_view
has 113 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function get_start_view()
{
global $FANNIE_OP_DB;
$dbc = FannieDB::get($FANNIE_OP_DB);
Function get_list_view
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function get_list_view()
{
global $FANNIE_OP_DB;
$dbc = FannieDB::get($FANNIE_OP_DB);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method javascript_content
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function javascript_content()
{
return <<<JAVASCRIPT
//$('a').not('.btn-back').attr('target','_blank');
$(document).ready(function(){
Function get_start_view
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function get_start_view()
{
global $FANNIE_OP_DB;
$dbc = FannieDB::get($FANNIE_OP_DB);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method post_upc_save_view
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function post_upc_save_view()
{
global $FANNIE_OP_DB;
$dbc = FannieDB::get($FANNIE_OP_DB);
$upc = FormLib::get('upc');
Function post_upc_save_view
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function post_upc_save_view()
{
global $FANNIE_OP_DB;
$dbc = FannieDB::get($FANNIE_OP_DB);
$upc = FormLib::get('upc');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method post_list_save_view
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function post_list_save_view()
{
global $FANNIE_OP_DB;
$dbc = FannieDB::get($FANNIE_OP_DB);
Method get_remove_view
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function get_remove_view()
{
return <<<HTML
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-4">
Method post_newLocation_view
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function post_newLocation_view()
{
global $FANNIE_OP_DB;
$dbc = FannieDB::get($FANNIE_OP_DB);
$upc = FormLib::get('upc');
Method post_batch_save_view
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function post_batch_save_view()
{
global $FANNIE_OP_DB;
$dbc = FannieDB::get($FANNIE_OP_DB);
Function post_batch_save_view
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function post_batch_save_view()
{
global $FANNIE_OP_DB;
$dbc = FannieDB::get($FANNIE_OP_DB);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function post_list_save_view
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function post_list_save_view()
{
global $FANNIE_OP_DB;
$dbc = FannieDB::get($FANNIE_OP_DB);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function preprocess()
{
$this->__routes[] = 'get<start>';
$this->__routes[] = 'get<batch>';
$this->__routes[] = 'post<batch><save>';
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 132.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private function arrayToOpts($arr, $selected=-999, $id_label=false)
{
$opts = '';
foreach ($arr as $num => $name) {
if ($id_label === true) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 103.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
foreach ($floor_section as $fs_key => $fs_value) {
if ($fs_key == $item[$key]['sugDept']) {
$ret .= '<option value="' . $fs_key . '" name="' . $key . '" selected>' . $fs_value . '</option>';
} else {
$ret .= '<option value="' . $fs_key . '" name="' . $key . '">' . $fs_value . '</option>';
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 90.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
foreach ($floor_section as $fs_key => $fs_value) {
if ($fs_key == $item[$key]['sugDept']) {
$ret .= '<option value="' . $fs_key . '" name="' . $key . '" selected>' . $fs_value . '</option>';
} else {
$ret .= '<option value="' . $fs_key . '" name="' . $key . '">' . $fs_value . '</option>';
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 90.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76