File deprecated.php
has 620 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/**
* Deprecated functions from past WordPress versions. You shouldn't use these
* globals and functions and look for the alternatives instead. The functions
* and globals will be removed in a later version.
Function get_links
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function get_links($category = -1, $before = '', $after = '<br />', $between = ' ', $show_images = true, $orderby = 'name',
$show_description = true, $show_rating = false, $limit = -1, $show_updated = 1, $echo = true) {
_deprecated_function(__FUNCTION__, '0.0', 'get_bookmarks()');
$order = 'ASC';
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_links
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function get_links($category = -1, $before = '', $after = '<br />', $between = ' ', $show_images = true, $orderby = 'name',
$show_description = true, $show_rating = false, $limit = -1, $show_updated = 1, $echo = true) {
_deprecated_function(__FUNCTION__, '0.0', 'get_bookmarks()');
$order = 'ASC';
Method list_cats
has 18 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function list_cats($optionall = 1, $all = 'All', $sort_column = 'ID', $sort_order = 'asc', $file = '', $list = true, $optiondates = 0,
$optioncount = 0, $hide_empty = 1, $use_desc_for_title = 1, $children=false, $child_of=0, $categories=0,
$recurse=0, $feed = '', $feed_image = '', $exclude = '', $hierarchical=false) {
Method get_links
has 11 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function get_links($category = -1, $before = '', $after = '<br />', $between = ' ', $show_images = true, $orderby = 'name',
$show_description = true, $show_rating = false, $limit = -1, $show_updated = 1, $echo = true) {
Function the_content_rss
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function the_content_rss($more_link_text='(more...)', $stripteaser=0, $more_file='', $cut = 0, $encode_html = 0) {
_deprecated_function(__FUNCTION__, '2.9', 'the_content_feed' );
$content = get_the_content($more_link_text, $stripteaser, $more_file);
$content = apply_filters('the_content_rss', $content);
if ( $cut && !$encode_html )
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method dropdown_cats
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function dropdown_cats($optionall = 1, $all = 'All', $orderby = 'ID', $order = 'asc',
$show_last_update = 0, $show_count = 0, $hide_empty = 1, $optionnone = false,
$selected = 0, $exclude = 0) {
Method get_linksbyname
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function get_linksbyname($cat_name = "noname", $before = '', $after = '<br />', $between = " ", $show_images = true, $orderby = 'id',
$show_description = true, $show_rating = false,
$limit = -1, $show_updated = 0) {
Function get_category_children
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function get_category_children( $id, $before = '/', $after = '', $visited = array() ) {
_deprecated_function(__FUNCTION__, '2.8', 'get_term_children()');
if ( 0 == $id )
return '';
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method the_content_rss
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function the_content_rss($more_link_text='(more...)', $stripteaser=0, $more_file='', $cut = 0, $encode_html = 0) {
_deprecated_function(__FUNCTION__, '2.9', 'the_content_feed' );
$content = get_the_content($more_link_text, $stripteaser, $more_file);
$content = apply_filters('the_content_rss', $content);
if ( $cut && !$encode_html )
Method get_links_withrating
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function get_links_withrating($category = -1, $before = '', $after = '<br />', $between = " ", $show_images = true,
$orderby = 'id', $show_description = true, $limit = -1, $show_updated = 0) {
Method get_linksbyname_withrating
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function get_linksbyname_withrating($cat_name = "noname", $before = '', $after = '<br />', $between = " ",
$show_images = true, $orderby = 'id', $show_description = true, $limit = -1, $show_updated = 0) {
Method link_pages
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function link_pages($before='<br />', $after='<br />', $next_or_number='number', $nextpagelink='next page', $previouspagelink='previous page',
$pagelink='%', $more_file='') {
Method list_authors
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function list_authors($optioncount = false, $exclude_admin = true, $show_fullname = false, $hide_empty = true, $feed = '', $feed_image = '') {
Method next_post
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function next_post($format='%', $next='next post: ', $title='yes', $in_same_cat='no', $limitnext=1, $excluded_categories='') {
Method previous_post
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function previous_post($format='%', $previous='previous post: ', $title='yes', $in_same_cat='no', $limitprev=1, $excluded_categories='') {
Method get_archives
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function get_archives($type='', $limit='', $format='html', $before = '', $after = '', $show_post_count = false) {
Method links_popup_script
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function links_popup_script($text = 'Links', $width=400, $height=400, $file='links.all.php', $count = true) {
Method the_content_rss
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function the_content_rss($more_link_text='(more...)', $stripteaser=0, $more_file='', $cut = 0, $encode_html = 0) {
Function wp_list_cats
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function wp_list_cats($args = '') {
_deprecated_function(__FUNCTION__, '0.0', 'wp_list_categories()');
$r = wp_parse_args( $args );
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function previous_post($format='%', $previous='previous post: ', $title='yes', $in_same_cat='no', $limitprev=1, $excluded_categories='') {
_deprecated_function(__FUNCTION__, '0.0', 'previous_post_link()');
if ( empty($in_same_cat) || 'no' == $in_same_cat )
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 208.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function next_post($format='%', $next='next post: ', $title='yes', $in_same_cat='no', $limitnext=1, $excluded_categories='') {
_deprecated_function(__FUNCTION__, '0.0', 'next_post_link()');
if ( empty($in_same_cat) || 'no' == $in_same_cat )
$in_same_cat = false;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 208.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76