Function wp_save_post_revision
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function wp_save_post_revision( $post_id ) {
if ( defined( 'DOING_AUTOSAVE' ) && DOING_AUTOSAVE )
return;
if ( ! $post = get_post( $post_id ) )
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File revision.php
has 279 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/**
* Post revision functions.
*
* @package WordPress
Method wp_save_post_revision
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function wp_save_post_revision( $post_id ) {
if ( defined( 'DOING_AUTOSAVE' ) && DOING_AUTOSAVE )
return;
if ( ! $post = get_post( $post_id ) )
Function _wp_upgrade_revisions_of_post
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _wp_upgrade_revisions_of_post( $post, $revisions ) {
global $wpdb;
// Add post option exclusively
$lock = "revision-upgrade-{$post->ID}";
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _wp_upgrade_revisions_of_post
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _wp_upgrade_revisions_of_post( $post, $revisions ) {
global $wpdb;
// Add post option exclusively
$lock = "revision-upgrade-{$post->ID}";
Function wp_get_post_autosave
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function wp_get_post_autosave( $post_id, $user_id = 0 ) {
$revisions = wp_get_post_revisions( $post_id, array( 'check_enabled' => false ) );
foreach ( $revisions as $revision ) {
if ( false !== strpos( $revision->post_name, "{$post_id}-autosave" ) ) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _wp_put_post_revision
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _wp_put_post_revision( $post = null, $autosave = false ) {
if ( is_object($post) )
$post = get_object_vars( $post );
elseif ( !is_array($post) )
$post = get_post($post, ARRAY_A);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return $revision;
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return $_revision;
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return;
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return $return;
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return $return;
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return $return;
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return;
Function wp_restore_post_revision
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function wp_restore_post_revision( $revision_id, $fields = null ) {
if ( !$revision = wp_get_post_revision( $revision_id, ARRAY_A ) )
return $revision;
if ( !is_array( $fields ) )
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function _wp_post_revision_fields( $post = null, $autosave = false ) {
static $fields = false;
if ( !$fields ) {
// Allow these to be versioned
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 336.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function _show_post_preview() {
if ( isset($_GET['preview_id']) && isset($_GET['preview_nonce']) ) {
$id = (int) $_GET['preview_id'];
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 98.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76