CaffGeek/MBACNationals

View on GitHub

Showing 7,504 of 7,504 total issues

Function Analyze has a Cognitive Complexity of 176 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public function Analyze()
    {
        $info = &$this->getid3->info;

        // parse container

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Event.Methods = (function() {
  var isButton;

  if (Prototype.Browser.IE) {
    var buttonMap = { 0: 1, 1: 4, 2: 2 };
Severity: Major
Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/js/prototype.js and 1 other location - About 3 days to fix
Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/js/scriptaculous/prototype.js on lines 3713..3771

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 607.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Event.Methods = (function() {
  var isButton;

  if (Prototype.Browser.IE) {
    var buttonMap = { 0: 1, 1: 4, 2: 2 };
Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/js/prototype.js on lines 3713..3771

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 607.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static function windows_1252_to_utf8($string)
    {
        static $convert_table = array("\x80" => "\xE2\x82\xAC", "\x81" => "\xEF\xBF\xBD", "\x82" => "\xE2\x80\x9A", "\x83" => "\xC6\x92", "\x84" => "\xE2\x80\x9E", "\x85" => "\xE2\x80\xA6", "\x86" => "\xE2\x80\xA0", "\x87" => "\xE2\x80\xA1", "\x88" => "\xCB\x86", "\x89" => "\xE2\x80\xB0", "\x8A" => "\xC5\xA0", "\x8B" => "\xE2\x80\xB9", "\x8C" => "\xC5\x92", "\x8D" => "\xEF\xBF\xBD", "\x8E" => "\xC5\xBD", "\x8F" => "\xEF\xBF\xBD", "\x90" => "\xEF\xBF\xBD", "\x91" => "\xE2\x80\x98", "\x92" => "\xE2\x80\x99", "\x93" => "\xE2\x80\x9C", "\x94" => "\xE2\x80\x9D", "\x95" => "\xE2\x80\xA2", "\x96" => "\xE2\x80\x93", "\x97" => "\xE2\x80\x94", "\x98" => "\xCB\x9C", "\x99" => "\xE2\x84\xA2", "\x9A" => "\xC5\xA1", "\x9B" => "\xE2\x80\xBA", "\x9C" => "\xC5\x93", "\x9D" => "\xEF\xBF\xBD", "\x9E" => "\xC5\xBE", "\x9F" => "\xC5\xB8", "\xA0" => "\xC2\xA0", "\xA1" => "\xC2\xA1", "\xA2" => "\xC2\xA2", "\xA3" => "\xC2\xA3", "\xA4" => "\xC2\xA4", "\xA5" => "\xC2\xA5", "\xA6" => "\xC2\xA6", "\xA7" => "\xC2\xA7", "\xA8" => "\xC2\xA8", "\xA9" => "\xC2\xA9", "\xAA" => "\xC2\xAA", "\xAB" => "\xC2\xAB", "\xAC" => "\xC2\xAC", "\xAD" => "\xC2\xAD", "\xAE" => "\xC2\xAE", "\xAF" => "\xC2\xAF", "\xB0" => "\xC2\xB0", "\xB1" => "\xC2\xB1", "\xB2" => "\xC2\xB2", "\xB3" => "\xC2\xB3", "\xB4" => "\xC2\xB4", "\xB5" => "\xC2\xB5", "\xB6" => "\xC2\xB6", "\xB7" => "\xC2\xB7", "\xB8" => "\xC2\xB8", "\xB9" => "\xC2\xB9", "\xBA" => "\xC2\xBA", "\xBB" => "\xC2\xBB", "\xBC" => "\xC2\xBC", "\xBD" => "\xC2\xBD", "\xBE" => "\xC2\xBE", "\xBF" => "\xC2\xBF", "\xC0" => "\xC3\x80", "\xC1" => "\xC3\x81", "\xC2" => "\xC3\x82", "\xC3" => "\xC3\x83", "\xC4" => "\xC3\x84", "\xC5" => "\xC3\x85", "\xC6" => "\xC3\x86", "\xC7" => "\xC3\x87", "\xC8" => "\xC3\x88", "\xC9" => "\xC3\x89", "\xCA" => "\xC3\x8A", "\xCB" => "\xC3\x8B", "\xCC" => "\xC3\x8C", "\xCD" => "\xC3\x8D", "\xCE" => "\xC3\x8E", "\xCF" => "\xC3\x8F", "\xD0" => "\xC3\x90", "\xD1" => "\xC3\x91", "\xD2" => "\xC3\x92", "\xD3" => "\xC3\x93", "\xD4" => "\xC3\x94", "\xD5" => "\xC3\x95", "\xD6" => "\xC3\x96", "\xD7" => "\xC3\x97", "\xD8" => "\xC3\x98", "\xD9" => "\xC3\x99", "\xDA" => "\xC3\x9A", "\xDB" => "\xC3\x9B", "\xDC" => "\xC3\x9C", "\xDD" => "\xC3\x9D", "\xDE" => "\xC3\x9E", "\xDF" => "\xC3\x9F", "\xE0" => "\xC3\xA0", "\xE1" => "\xC3\xA1", "\xE2" => "\xC3\xA2", "\xE3" => "\xC3\xA3", "\xE4" => "\xC3\xA4", "\xE5" => "\xC3\xA5", "\xE6" => "\xC3\xA6", "\xE7" => "\xC3\xA7", "\xE8" => "\xC3\xA8", "\xE9" => "\xC3\xA9", "\xEA" => "\xC3\xAA", "\xEB" => "\xC3\xAB", "\xEC" => "\xC3\xAC", "\xED" => "\xC3\xAD", "\xEE" => "\xC3\xAE", "\xEF" => "\xC3\xAF", "\xF0" => "\xC3\xB0", "\xF1" => "\xC3\xB1", "\xF2" => "\xC3\xB2", "\xF3" => "\xC3\xB3", "\xF4" => "\xC3\xB4", "\xF5" => "\xC3\xB5", "\xF6" => "\xC3\xB6", "\xF7" => "\xC3\xB7", "\xF8" => "\xC3\xB8", "\xF9" => "\xC3\xB9", "\xFA" => "\xC3\xBA", "\xFB" => "\xC3\xBB", "\xFC" => "\xC3\xBC", "\xFD" => "\xC3\xBD", "\xFE" => "\xC3\xBE", "\xFF" => "\xC3\xBF");

        return strtr($string, $convert_table);
Severity: Major
Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/SimplePie/Misc.php and 1 other location - About 3 days to fix
Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/class-simplepie.php on lines 9402..9407

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 669.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    function windows_1252_to_utf8($string)
    {
        static $convert_table = array("\x80" => "\xE2\x82\xAC", "\x81" => "\xEF\xBF\xBD", "\x82" => "\xE2\x80\x9A", "\x83" => "\xC6\x92", "\x84" => "\xE2\x80\x9E", "\x85" => "\xE2\x80\xA6", "\x86" => "\xE2\x80\xA0", "\x87" => "\xE2\x80\xA1", "\x88" => "\xCB\x86", "\x89" => "\xE2\x80\xB0", "\x8A" => "\xC5\xA0", "\x8B" => "\xE2\x80\xB9", "\x8C" => "\xC5\x92", "\x8D" => "\xEF\xBF\xBD", "\x8E" => "\xC5\xBD", "\x8F" => "\xEF\xBF\xBD", "\x90" => "\xEF\xBF\xBD", "\x91" => "\xE2\x80\x98", "\x92" => "\xE2\x80\x99", "\x93" => "\xE2\x80\x9C", "\x94" => "\xE2\x80\x9D", "\x95" => "\xE2\x80\xA2", "\x96" => "\xE2\x80\x93", "\x97" => "\xE2\x80\x94", "\x98" => "\xCB\x9C", "\x99" => "\xE2\x84\xA2", "\x9A" => "\xC5\xA1", "\x9B" => "\xE2\x80\xBA", "\x9C" => "\xC5\x93", "\x9D" => "\xEF\xBF\xBD", "\x9E" => "\xC5\xBE", "\x9F" => "\xC5\xB8", "\xA0" => "\xC2\xA0", "\xA1" => "\xC2\xA1", "\xA2" => "\xC2\xA2", "\xA3" => "\xC2\xA3", "\xA4" => "\xC2\xA4", "\xA5" => "\xC2\xA5", "\xA6" => "\xC2\xA6", "\xA7" => "\xC2\xA7", "\xA8" => "\xC2\xA8", "\xA9" => "\xC2\xA9", "\xAA" => "\xC2\xAA", "\xAB" => "\xC2\xAB", "\xAC" => "\xC2\xAC", "\xAD" => "\xC2\xAD", "\xAE" => "\xC2\xAE", "\xAF" => "\xC2\xAF", "\xB0" => "\xC2\xB0", "\xB1" => "\xC2\xB1", "\xB2" => "\xC2\xB2", "\xB3" => "\xC2\xB3", "\xB4" => "\xC2\xB4", "\xB5" => "\xC2\xB5", "\xB6" => "\xC2\xB6", "\xB7" => "\xC2\xB7", "\xB8" => "\xC2\xB8", "\xB9" => "\xC2\xB9", "\xBA" => "\xC2\xBA", "\xBB" => "\xC2\xBB", "\xBC" => "\xC2\xBC", "\xBD" => "\xC2\xBD", "\xBE" => "\xC2\xBE", "\xBF" => "\xC2\xBF", "\xC0" => "\xC3\x80", "\xC1" => "\xC3\x81", "\xC2" => "\xC3\x82", "\xC3" => "\xC3\x83", "\xC4" => "\xC3\x84", "\xC5" => "\xC3\x85", "\xC6" => "\xC3\x86", "\xC7" => "\xC3\x87", "\xC8" => "\xC3\x88", "\xC9" => "\xC3\x89", "\xCA" => "\xC3\x8A", "\xCB" => "\xC3\x8B", "\xCC" => "\xC3\x8C", "\xCD" => "\xC3\x8D", "\xCE" => "\xC3\x8E", "\xCF" => "\xC3\x8F", "\xD0" => "\xC3\x90", "\xD1" => "\xC3\x91", "\xD2" => "\xC3\x92", "\xD3" => "\xC3\x93", "\xD4" => "\xC3\x94", "\xD5" => "\xC3\x95", "\xD6" => "\xC3\x96", "\xD7" => "\xC3\x97", "\xD8" => "\xC3\x98", "\xD9" => "\xC3\x99", "\xDA" => "\xC3\x9A", "\xDB" => "\xC3\x9B", "\xDC" => "\xC3\x9C", "\xDD" => "\xC3\x9D", "\xDE" => "\xC3\x9E", "\xDF" => "\xC3\x9F", "\xE0" => "\xC3\xA0", "\xE1" => "\xC3\xA1", "\xE2" => "\xC3\xA2", "\xE3" => "\xC3\xA3", "\xE4" => "\xC3\xA4", "\xE5" => "\xC3\xA5", "\xE6" => "\xC3\xA6", "\xE7" => "\xC3\xA7", "\xE8" => "\xC3\xA8", "\xE9" => "\xC3\xA9", "\xEA" => "\xC3\xAA", "\xEB" => "\xC3\xAB", "\xEC" => "\xC3\xAC", "\xED" => "\xC3\xAD", "\xEE" => "\xC3\xAE", "\xEF" => "\xC3\xAF", "\xF0" => "\xC3\xB0", "\xF1" => "\xC3\xB1", "\xF2" => "\xC3\xB2", "\xF3" => "\xC3\xB3", "\xF4" => "\xC3\xB4", "\xF5" => "\xC3\xB5", "\xF6" => "\xC3\xB6", "\xF7" => "\xC3\xB7", "\xF8" => "\xC3\xB8", "\xF9" => "\xC3\xB9", "\xFA" => "\xC3\xBA", "\xFB" => "\xC3\xBB", "\xFC" => "\xC3\xBC", "\xFD" => "\xC3\xBD", "\xFE" => "\xC3\xBE", "\xFF" => "\xC3\xBF");

        return strtr($string, $convert_table);
Severity: Major
Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/class-simplepie.php and 1 other location - About 3 days to fix
Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/SimplePie/Misc.php on lines 276..281

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 669.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

class SimplePie_Cache_DB
{
    function prepare_simplepie_object_for_cache($data)
    {
        $items = $data->get_items();
Severity: Major
Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/class-simplepie.php and 1 other location - About 3 days to fix
Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/SimplePie/Cache/DB.php on lines 51..137

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 660.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

abstract class SimplePie_Cache_DB implements SimplePie_Cache_Base
{
    /**
     * Helper for database conversion
     *
Severity: Major
Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/SimplePie/Cache/DB.php and 1 other location - About 3 days to fix
Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/class-simplepie.php on lines 8719..8797

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 660.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Form.Element.Serializers = {
  input: function(element, value) {
    switch (element.type.toLowerCase()) {
      case 'checkbox':
      case 'radio':
Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/js/prototype.js on lines 3536..3597

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 578.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Form.Element.Serializers = {
  input: function(element, value) {
    switch (element.type.toLowerCase()) {
      case 'checkbox':
      case 'radio':
Severity: Major
Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/js/prototype.js and 1 other location - About 3 days to fix
Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/js/scriptaculous/prototype.js on lines 3536..3597

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 578.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method get_posts has 678 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    function &get_posts() {
        global $wpdb, $user_ID;

        do_action_ref_array('pre_get_posts', array(&$this));

Severity: Major
Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/query.php - About 3 days to fix

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        var $month = array(
            // English
            'jan' => 1,
            'january' => 1,
            'feb' => 2,
    Severity: Major
    Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/SimplePie/Parse/Date.php and 1 other location - About 3 days to fix
    Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/class-simplepie.php on lines 12631..12768

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 637.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        var $month = array(
            // English
            'jan' => 1,
            'january' => 1,
            'feb' => 2,
    Severity: Major
    Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/class-simplepie.php and 1 other location - About 3 days to fix
    Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/SimplePie/Parse/Date.php on lines 157..294

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 637.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Function redirect_canonical has a Cognitive Complexity of 160 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    function redirect_canonical($requested_url=null, $do_redirect=true) {
        global $wp_rewrite, $is_IIS, $wp_query, $wpdb;
    
        if ( is_trackback() || is_search() || is_comments_popup() || is_admin() || $is_IIS || ( isset($_POST) && count($_POST) ) || is_preview() || is_robots() )
            return;
    Severity: Minor
    Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/canonical.php - About 3 days to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function ParseRIFF has a Cognitive Complexity of 160 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        public function ParseRIFF($startoffset, $maxoffset) {
            $info = &$this->getid3->info;
    
            $RIFFchunk = false;
            $FoundAllChunksWeNeed = false;
    Severity: Minor
    Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/ID3/module.audio-video.riff.php - About 3 days to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    File getid3.php has 1242 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    <?php
    /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
    /// getID3() by James Heinrich <info@getid3.org>               //
    //  available at http://getid3.sourceforge.net                 //
    //            or http://www.getid3.org                         //
    Severity: Major
    Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/ID3/getid3.php - About 3 days to fix

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      Object.extend(Function.prototype, {
        argumentNames: function() {
          var names = this.toString().match(/^[\s\(]*function[^(]*\((.*?)\)/)[1].split(",").invoke("strip");
          return names.length == 1 && !names[0] ? [] : names;
        },
      Severity: Major
      Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/js/prototype.js and 1 other location - About 3 days to fix
      Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/js/scriptaculous/prototype.js on lines 200..250

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 547.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      Object.extend(Function.prototype, {
        argumentNames: function() {
          var names = this.toString().match(/^[\s\(]*function[^(]*\((.*?)\)/)[1].split(",").invoke("strip");
          return names.length == 1 && !names[0] ? [] : names;
        },
      Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/js/prototype.js on lines 200..250

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 547.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Function Analyze has a Cognitive Complexity of 156 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          public function Analyze() {
              $info = &$this->getid3->info;
      
              //    Overall tag structure:
              //        +-----------------------------+
      Severity: Minor
      Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/ID3/module.tag.id3v2.php - About 3 days to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function parse_query has a Cognitive Complexity of 154 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          function parse_query ($query) {
              if ( !empty($query) || !isset($this->query) ) {
                  $this->init();
                  if ( is_array($query) )
                      $this->query_vars = $query;
      Severity: Minor
      Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/query.php - About 3 days to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
      Open

              if (isset($parsedFrame['datalength']) && ($parsedFrame['datalength'] == 0)) {
      
                  $warning = 'Frame "'.$parsedFrame['frame_name'].'" at offset '.$parsedFrame['dataoffset'].' has no data portion';
                  switch ($parsedFrame['frame_name']) {
                      case 'WCOM':
      Severity: Critical
      Found in Web.Admin/2014/wordpress/wp-includes/ID3/module.tag.id3v2.php - About 3 days to fix
        Severity
        Category
        Status
        Source
        Language