Showing 16 of 16 total issues
Function processAutotype
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function processAutotype(param) {
if (/a/.test(param.m)) {
// Auto-parameters should guess what the value is supposed to mean.
// If it's a number or boolean, just output it as is.
// But if it's a string, it depends on whether it can also be a type.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Script
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Script(code) {
// Raw copy of the code.
this.rawCode = code || '';
// These references work like in the loader. See loader.js.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Script
has 64 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Script(code) {
// Raw copy of the code.
this.rawCode = code || '';
// These references work like in the loader. See loader.js.
Function pluginImplementation
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function pluginImplementation(name, options, processParameter) {
return function() {
// Construct parameter definitons.
var definitions = [];
if (options.params) {
Function info
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Script.info = function(scriptPath, cwd, callback) {
var arg = ['-m', scriptPath];
system.spawn(system.avsinfo, arg, cwd, true, function(code, stdout, stderr) {
if (code && code !== 2) {
// This probably means status code 5, which happens on crashes,
Function createPlugin
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function createPlugin(name, options, types) {
// Lazyness taken to new heights. First parameter can succintly describe some filters.
// If combined with defining the second parameter, that will represent the types.
if (name.indexOf('(') !== -1) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function load
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.load = function(file, ignoreErrors, references) {
file = path.resolve(file);
if (!utils.isValidPath(file)) throw new AvisynthError('Path contains invalid characters!');
references = references || exports.references;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function spawn
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.spawn = function(cmd, args, cwd, internal, callback) {
// Internal calls can make the callback recieve extra info.
if (!callback) {
callback = internal;
internal = false;
Function spawn
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.spawn = function(cmd, args, cwd, internal, callback) {
// Internal calls can make the callback recieve extra info.
if (!callback) {
callback = internal;
internal = false;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function processPath(param) {
if (/[fp]/.test(param.m)) {
param.value = path.resolve(param.value);
}
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function processColor(param) {
if (/c/.test(param.m)) {
param.value = colors.parse(param.value);
}
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function addPlugin
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var addPlugin = exports.addPlugin = function(name, options, code) {
if (!code) { code = options; options = {}; }
// Do not add a plugin twice, and avoid name collisions.
var lowercase = name.toLowerCase();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!/^[a-z_][0-9a-z_]*$/i.test(param.value)) {
throw new AvisynthError('bad syntax for variable name "' + param.value + '"!');
}
Function spawn
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.spawn = function(cmd, args, cwd, internal, callback) {
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return +value == value;
Function parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.parse = function(color) {
// A valid number.
if (typeof color === 'number' && color >= 0 && color <= 0xFFFFFF) {
return hexColor(Math.round(color));
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"