Class User
has 148 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class User < Sequel::Model
include CartoDB::MiniSequel
include CartoDB::UserDecorator
include CartodbCentralSynchronizable
include CartoDB::ConfigUtils
File user.rb
has 1094 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'cartodb/per_request_sequel_cache'
require 'cartodb-common'
require 'email_address'
require 'securerandom'
require_relative './user/user_decorator'
Method before_save
has a Cognitive Complexity of 66 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def before_save
super
self.quota_in_bytes = self.quota_in_bytes.to_i if !self.quota_in_bytes.nil? && self.quota_in_bytes != self.quota_in_bytes.to_i
self.updated_at = Time.now
# Set account_type and default values for organization users
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method before_destroy
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def before_destroy(skip_table_drop: false)
ensure_nonviewer
@org_id_for_org_wipe = nil
error_happened = false
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method after_save
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def after_save
super
save_metadata
changes = (self.previous_changes.present? ? self.previous_changes.keys : [])
db_service.set_statement_timeouts if changes.include?(:user_timeout) || changes.include?(:database_timeout)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method before_destroy
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def before_destroy(skip_table_drop: false)
ensure_nonviewer
@org_id_for_org_wipe = nil
error_happened = false
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if changes.include?(:account_type) || changes.include?(:available_for_hire) || changes.include?(:disqus_shortname) || changes.include?(:email) || \
changes.include?(:website) || changes.include?(:name) || changes.include?(:description) || \
changes.include?(:twitter_username) || changes.include?(:location)
invalidate_varnish_cache(regex: '.*:vizjson')
end
Method before_save
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def before_save
super
self.quota_in_bytes = self.quota_in_bytes.to_i if !self.quota_in_bytes.nil? && self.quota_in_bytes != self.quota_in_bytes.to_i
self.updated_at = Time.now
# Set account_type and default values for organization users
Method set_viewer_quotas
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_viewer_quotas
self.quota_in_bytes = 0 unless quota_in_bytes == 0
self.geocoding_quota = 0 unless geocoding_quota == 0
self.soft_geocoding_limit = false if soft_geocoding_limit
self.twitter_datasource_quota = 0 unless twitter_datasource_quota == 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method db_size_in_bytes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def db_size_in_bytes
return 0 if self.new?
attempts = 0
begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method save_metadata
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def save_metadata
$users_metadata.HMSET key,
'id', id,
'database_name', database_name,
'database_password', database_password,
Method organization_validation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def organization_validation
if new?
organization.validate_for_signup(errors, self)
unless valid_email_domain?(email)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
self.mobile_gis_extension = true unless changed_columns.include?(:mobile_gis_extension)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
self.mobile_custom_watermark = false unless changed_columns.include?(:mobile_custom_watermark)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
self.mobile_xamarin = true unless changed_columns.include?(:mobile_xamarin)
Method in_database
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def in_database(options = {}, &block)
if options[:statement_timeout]
in_database.run("SET statement_timeout TO #{options[:statement_timeout]}")
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
self.mobile_offline_maps = false unless changed_columns.include?(:mobile_offline_maps)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
self.mobile_max_open_users = 10000 unless changed_columns.include?(:mobile_max_open_users)
Method validate_password
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_password
validates_presence :password if new? && crypted_password.blank?
if new? || (password.present? && !@new_password.present?)
errors.add(:password, "is not confirmed") unless password == password_confirmation
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
self.mobile_max_private_users = 10 unless changed_columns.include?(:mobile_max_private_users)
Method visualization_count
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def visualization_count(filters = {})
return 0 unless id
vqb = Carto::VisualizationQueryBuilder.new
vqb.with_type(filters[:type]) if filters[:type]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method change_password
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def change_password(old_password, new_password_value, new_password_confirmation_value)
# First of all reset fields
@old_password_validated = nil
@new_password_confirmation = nil
# Mark as changing passwords
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method before_validation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def before_validation
self.email = clean_email(email.to_s)
self.geocoding_quota ||= DEFAULT_GEOCODING_QUOTA
self.here_isolines_quota ||= DEFAULT_HERE_ISOLINES_QUOTA
self.mapzen_routing_quota ||= DEFAULT_MAPZEN_ROUTING_QUOTA
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method importing_jobs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def importing_jobs
imports = DataImport.where(state: ['complete', 'failure']).invert
.where(user_id: self.id)
.where { created_at > Time.now - 24.hours }.all
running_import_ids = Resque::Worker.all.map { |worker| worker.job["payload"]["args"].first["job_id"] rescue nil }.compact
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"