Function _get_inventory_html
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_inventory_html(inventory, file_name, spec=inventory_spec):
if file_name is None:
raise ImcOperationError("Inventory collection",
"file_name is a required parameter")
f = open(file_name, "w")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _get_inventory
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_inventory(handle, comp, spec, inventory):
component = spec[comp]
class_id = component["class_id"]
mos = handle.query_classid(class_id)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File inventory.py
has 352 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
# Copyright 2016 Cisco Systems, Inc.
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
Function _get_inventory_csv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_inventory_csv(inventory, file_name, spec=inventory_spec):
import csv
if file_name is None:
raise ImcOperationError("Inventory collection",
"file_name is a required parameter")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function inventory_get
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def inventory_get(handle,
component="all",
file_format="json",
file_name=None,
spec=inventory_spec):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if key not in entry:
continue
row_val.append(entry[key])
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if _should_ignore(component, sub_mo):
continue
_sanitize_and_store(mo_dict, prop, sub_mo)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if key not in entry:
continue
row_val.append(entry[key])
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if each is None:
each = ""
html += "<td>" + each + "</td>"
Function inventory_get
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def inventory_get(handle,
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1943.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76