Method createReceiveRequestBody
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private String createReceiveRequestBody(String doc, String url, String shellId, String commandId, String maxEnvelopeSize, String winrmLocale, String operationTimeout) throws RuntimeException {
Method createExecuteCommandRequestBody
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private String createExecuteCommandRequestBody(String doc, String url, String shellId, String command, String maxEnvelopeSize, String winrmLocale, String operationTimeout) throws RuntimeException {
Method createDeleteShellRequestBody
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private String createDeleteShellRequestBody(String doc, String url, String shellId, String maxEnvelopeSize, String winrmLocale, String operationTimeout) throws RuntimeException {
Method receiveCommandResult
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private Map<String, String> receiveCommandResult(HttpClientService csHttpClient, HttpClientInputs httpClientInputs,
String shellId, String commandId, WSManRequestInputs wsManRequestInputs) throws Exception {
String documentStr = ResourceLoader.loadAsString(RECEIVE_REQUEST_XML);
documentStr = createReceiveRequestBody(documentStr, httpClientInputs.getUrl(), shellId, commandId, String.valueOf(wsManRequestInputs.getMaxEnvelopeSize()), wsManRequestInputs.getWinrmLocale(), String.valueOf(wsManRequestInputs.getOperationTimeout()));
Map<String, String> receiveResult;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method receiveCommandResult
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private Map<String, String> receiveCommandResult(HttpClientService csHttpClient, HttpClientInputs httpClientInputs,
String shellId, String commandId, WSManRequestInputs wsManRequestInputs) throws Exception {
Method createCreateShellRequestBody
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private String createCreateShellRequestBody(String doc, String url, String maxEnvelopeSize, String winrmLocale, String operationTimeout) throws RuntimeException {
Method replaceCommonPlaceholders
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private String replaceCommonPlaceholders(String doc, String url, String maxEnvelopeSize, String winrmLocale, String operationTimeout) {
Method executeCommand
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private String executeCommand(HttpClientService csHttpClient, HttpClientInputs httpClientInputs, String shellId,
WSManRequestInputs wsManRequestInputs, String command) throws Exception {
Method getResourceId
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private String getResourceId(String response, String resourceResponseAction, String resourceIdXpath, String resourceIdExceptionMessage) throws ParserConfigurationException, SAXException, XPathExpressionException, IOException {
if (WSManUtils.isSpecificResponseAction(response, resourceResponseAction)) {
String shellId = XMLUtils.parseXml(response, resourceIdXpath);
if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(shellId)) {
return shellId;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private String createReceiveRequestBody(String doc, String url, String shellId, String commandId, String maxEnvelopeSize, String winrmLocale, String operationTimeout) throws RuntimeException {
doc = replaceCommonPlaceholders(doc, url, maxEnvelopeSize, winrmLocale, operationTimeout);
doc = replacePlaceholder(doc, SHELL_ID_PLACEHOLDER_NAME, shellId);
doc = replacePlaceholder(doc, MESSAGE_ID_PLACEHOLDER_NAME, UUID_LABEL + UUID.randomUUID().toString());
return replacePlaceholder(doc, COMMAND_ID_PLACEHOLDER_NAME, commandId);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private String createExecuteCommandRequestBody(String doc, String url, String shellId, String command, String maxEnvelopeSize, String winrmLocale, String operationTimeout) throws RuntimeException {
doc = replaceCommonPlaceholders(doc, url, maxEnvelopeSize, winrmLocale, operationTimeout);
doc = replacePlaceholder(doc, SHELL_ID_PLACEHOLDER_NAME, shellId);
doc = replacePlaceholder(doc, MESSAGE_ID_PLACEHOLDER_NAME, UUID_LABEL + UUID.randomUUID().toString());
return replacePlaceholder(doc, COMMAND_PLACEHOLDER_NAME, command);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76