Sign upLogin

CloudSlang/cs-actions

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 3,993 of 4,022 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @NotNull
    public static String deleteContainer(@NotNull final StorageInputs inputs) throws Exception {
        final CloudBlobClient blobClient = getCloudBlobClient(inputs);
        final CloudBlobContainer container = blobClient.getContainerReference(inputs.getContainerName());
        container.delete();
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-azure/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/azure/services/StorageServiceImpl.java and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
cs-azure/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/azure/services/StorageServiceImpl.java on lines 42..48

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 40.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @NotNull
    public static List<String> verifyDeleteMonitorInputs(@Nullable final String fullPathToMonitor) {
        final List<String> exceptionMessages = new ArrayList<>();

        if (StringUtils.isEmpty(fullPathToMonitor)) {
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-microfocus-sitescope/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/sitescope/utils/InputsValidation.java and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
cs-microfocus-sitescope/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/sitescope/utils/InputsValidation.java on lines 42..51

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 40.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                    for (File image : fileList) {
                        result.append(OcrService.extractTextFromImage(image.getAbsolutePath(), dataPath, lang, textBlocks,
                                deskew));
                        FileUtils.forceDelete(image);
                    }
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-tesseract/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/tesseract/services/PdfService.java and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
cs-tesseract/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/tesseract/services/PdfService.java on lines 53..57

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 40.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            } else if (POTENTIAL_MALICIOUS_CHARS.contains(String.valueOf(ch))) {
                sb.append('%').append(Integer.toHexString(ch));
            } else {
                sb.append(ch);
            }
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-abbyy/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/abbyy/utils/EncodingUtils.java and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
cs-abbyy/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/abbyy/utils/EncodingUtils.java on lines 58..62

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 40.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if (input.getMessageNumber() > folder.getMessageCount()) {
                throw new IndexOutOfBoundsException("Message value was: " + input.getMessageNumber() + " there are only " +
                        folder.getMessageCount() + " messages in folder");
            }
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-mail/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/mail/services/GetMailAttachmentService.java and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
cs-abbyy/src/test/java/io/cloudslang/content/abbyy/services/ProcessImageServiceTest.java on lines 236..266

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 40.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        Map<String, String> results = new VmService().updateVM(httpInputsMock, new VmInputs.VmInputsBuilder()
                .withVirtualMachineName("testVM")
                .withOperation("add")
                .withDevice("disk")
                .withUpdateValue("someDisk")
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-vmware/src/test/java/io/cloudslang/content/vmware/services/VmServiceTest.java and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
cs-vmware/src/test/java/io/cloudslang/content/vmware/services/VmServiceTest.java on lines 1066..1068

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 40.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    protected IReader getFile(String source) throws Exception {
        File tempFile;
        tempFile = File.createTempFile("SMBCopy", ".tmp");
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-rft/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/rft/remote_copy/SmbCopier.java and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
cs-rft/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/rft/remote_copy/ScpCopier.java on lines 66..72

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 40.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        Map<String, String> results = new VmService().updateVM(httpInputsMock, new VmInputs.VmInputsBuilder()
                .withVirtualMachineName("testVM").withOperation("add").withDevice("disk").withUpdateValue("someDisk")
                .withLongVmDiskSize("30000").withDiskMode("persistent").build());
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-vmware/src/test/java/io/cloudslang/content/vmware/services/VmServiceTest.java and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
cs-vmware/src/test/java/io/cloudslang/content/vmware/services/VmServiceTest.java on lines 722..729

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 40.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @NotNull
    public static String createContainer(@NotNull final StorageInputs inputs) throws Exception {
        final CloudBlobClient blobClient = getCloudBlobClient(inputs);
        final CloudBlobContainer container = blobClient.getContainerReference(inputs.getContainerName());
        container.create();
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-azure/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/azure/services/StorageServiceImpl.java and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
cs-azure/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/azure/services/StorageServiceImpl.java on lines 60..66

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 40.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static String getValue(String input) throws Exception {
        try {
            return valueOf(input.toUpperCase()).toString();
        } catch (IllegalArgumentException iae) {
            throw new RuntimeException("Unrecognized disk mode value: [" + input + "]. " +
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-vmware/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/vmware/entities/DiskMode.java and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
cs-vmware/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/vmware/entities/Operation.java on lines 29..36

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 40.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Test
    public void testProcessDumpException() throws SQLException {

        SQLException sqlException = new SQLException("dump is complete") {
            @Override
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-database/src/test/java/io/cloudslang/content/database/utils/SQLUtilsTest.java and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
cs-database/src/test/java/io/cloudslang/content/database/utils/SQLUtilsTest.java on lines 135..147

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 40.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method isValidAttributesList has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static boolean isValidAttributesList(String attributesList, String delimiter) {
        if (attributesList == null || attributesList.isEmpty()) {
            return false;
        }
        String[] attributeValuePairs = attributesList.split(delimiter+"\\s*");
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-active-directory/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/active_directory/utils/InputBuilderUtils.java - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method removeSshSession has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static void removeSshSession(GlobalSessionObject<Map<String, SSHConnection>> sessionParam, String sessionId) {
        if (sessionParam != null) {
            SessionResource<Map<String, SSHConnection>> resource = sessionParam.getResource();
            if (resource != null) {
                Map<String, SSHConnection> tempMap = resource.get();
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-ssh/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/ssh/utils/CacheUtils.java - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getSshSession has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private static Session getSshSession(SessionResource<Map<String, SSHConnection>> resource, String sessionId) {
        if (resource != null) {
            Object obj = resource.get();
            if (obj != null) {
                SSHConnection sshConnection = (SSHConnection) ((Map) obj).get(sessionId);
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-ssh/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/ssh/utils/CacheUtils.java - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getSshChannel has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private static Channel getSshChannel(SessionResource<Map<String, SSHConnection>> resource, String sessionId) {
        if (resource != null) {
            Object obj = resource.get();
            if (obj != null) {
                SSHConnection sshConnection = (SSHConnection) ((Map) obj).get(sessionId);
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-ssh/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/ssh/utils/CacheUtils.java - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getKeyFile has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    protected KeyFile getKeyFile(String privateKeyFile, String privateKeyPassPhrase) {
        KeyFile keyFile = null;
        if (privateKeyFile != null && !privateKeyFile.isEmpty()) {
            if (privateKeyPassPhrase != null && !privateKeyPassPhrase.isEmpty()) {
                keyFile = new KeyFile(privateKeyFile, privateKeyPassPhrase);
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-ssh/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/ssh/services/actions/SSHShellAbstract.java - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method setIdentity has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static void setIdentity(JSch jsch, IdentityKey identityKey) throws SSHException {
        byte[] passPhrase = identityKey.getPassPhrase();
        if (identityKey instanceof KeyFile) {
            try {
                jsch.addIdentity(((KeyFile) identityKey).getKeyFilePath(), passPhrase);
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-ssh/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/ssh/utils/IdentityKeyUtils.java - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getIdentityKey has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static IdentityKey getIdentityKey(String privateKeyFile, String privateKeyString, String privateKeyPassphrase) {
        IdentityKey identityKey = null;
        if (StringUtilities.isNotEmpty(privateKeyFile)) {
            identityKey = new KeyFile(privateKeyFile);
        }
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-ssh/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/ssh/utils/IdentityKeyUtils.java - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getValue has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static String getValue(String input) {
        if (isBlank(input)) {
            return MEMCACHED.getValue();
        }
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-couchbase/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/couchbase/entities/couchbase/BucketType.java - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method buildSource has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static String buildSource(String source) throws Exception {
        File f = new File(source);

        if (StringUtils.isEmpty(source)) {
            throw new Exception(ExceptionMsgs.EMPTY_SOURCE);
Severity: Minor
Found in cs-filesystem/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/filesystem/utils/InputBuilderUtils.java - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language