Showing 53 of 53 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
namespace Mollie\API\Resource;
use Mollie\API\Model\Issuer;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 159.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
namespace Mollie\API\Resource;
use Mollie\API\Model\Method;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 159.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function parseData
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function parseData($name, $value)
{
if (!empty($value)) {
if (preg_match('/.+(Datetime|Date)$/', $name)) {
// ISO 8601 Date
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method testCreateRecurringCustomerPayment
has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function testCreateRecurringCustomerPayment()
{
// Mock the payment
$paymentMock = $this->getPayment();
Function assertModel
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function assertModel(ModelBase $model, $reference, array $mapping)
{
foreach ($mapping as $k => $v) {
$k = is_int($k) ? $v : $k; // Handle non-associative arrays
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getMultiPageRequestMock
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function getMultiPageRequestMock(Mollie $api, $data, $endpoint)
{
// Epic math skills
$totalCount = count($data);
$dataPageOne = array_slice($data, 0, floor($totalCount / 2));
Method testCreateCustomerPayment
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function testCreateCustomerPayment()
{
// Mock the payment
$paymentMock = $this->getPayment();
Method testCreatePayment
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function testCreatePayment()
{
// Mock the payment
$paymentMock = $this->getPayment();
Method testCreateCustomerSubscription
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function testCreateCustomerSubscription()
{
// Mock the subscription
$subscriptionMock = $this->getSubscription();
Method testCreateCustomerMandate
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function testCreateCustomerMandate()
{
// Mock the mandate
$mandateMock = $this->getCustomerMandate();
Method parseData
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function parseData($name, $value)
{
if (!empty($value)) {
if (preg_match('/.+(Datetime|Date)$/', $name)) {
// ISO 8601 Date
Method update
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function update($name = null, $email = null, $metadata = null, $locale = null, $customerId = null)
{
// Check metadata type if given
if (isset($metadata) && !is_object($metadata) && !is_array($metadata)) {
throw new \InvalidArgumentException('Metadata argument must be of type array or object.');
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function create($amount, $interval, $description, $times = null, array $opts = array())
{
// Check number of times
if (isset($times) && ($times < 1 || !is_numeric($times))) {
throw new \InvalidArgumentException("Invalid number of charges for this subscription. Please enter a number of 1 or more, or leave null for an ongoing subscription.");
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function create($amount, $description, $redirectUrl, $metadata = null, array $opts = array())
Method createFirstRecurring
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function createFirstRecurring($amount, $description, $redirectUrl, $metadata = nul, array $opts = array())
Method create
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function create($amount, $description, $redirectUrl, $metadata = null, array $opts = array())
Method update
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function update($name = null, $email = null, $metadata = null, $locale = null, $customerId = null)
Method create
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function create($amount, $interval, $description, $times = null, array $opts = array())
Function getResourceID
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function getResourceID($resource, $type, &$property = null)
{
// Get short resource type class name (payment, customer...)
$name = strtolower(substr($type, strrpos($type, '\\') + 1));
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Missing class import via use statement (line '110', column '23'). Open
throw new \InvalidArgumentException('Request data failed to encode to JSON format.');
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MissingImport
Since: 2.7.0
Importing all external classes in a file through use statements makes them clearly visible.
Example
function make() {
return new \stdClass();
}